MRI Role in Knee Hemophilic Arthopathy

November 16, 2025 updated by: kerolos wagdy maurice morid, Assiut University

MRI Vs Conventional Radiography in Assessing Knee Hemophilic Arthropathy : A Scoring Based Approach

The aim of this study is to assess role of MRI in detecting synovial, cartilaginous , osseous abnormalities ، bleeding inside knee joint and to use a system for assessing HA as support for therapeutic regimes and for monitoring response to therapy .

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Detailed Description

Hemophilia is a mostly inherited genetic disorder caused by a complete or partial deficiency of coagulation factors VIII or IX, which impairs the body's ability to form blood clots-a process necessary to stop bleeding. This results in prolonged bleeding after injury, easy bruising, and an increased risk of internal bleeding, particularly within joints or the brain.

Hemophilic arthropathy (HA), caused by recurrent hemarthrosis, is the most common musculoskeletal manifestation of hemophilia and one of the most disabling complications of the disease. It can lead to severe pain, deformity, destruction of the joint, debilitating arthritis, and permanent joint damage.

Clinical assessment plays only a minor role in detecting the early stages of HA, as early clinical signs are often nonspecific and of limited value in quantifying disease involvement. Conventional radiographs mainly detect bone lesions that appear in advanced HA, but they cannot identify early changes such as synovial hypertrophy or focal cartilage destruction. Computed tomography (CT) is highly sensitive for detecting bone changes, but it provides limited information on soft tissue involvement and requires a relatively high dose of ionizing radiation.

By contrast, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) offers superior soft tissue contrast, allowing detailed evaluation of hemophilic joints and visualization of synovial and cartilaginous abnormalities.

T1-weighted imaging: evaluates bone marrow, joint anatomy, and subchondral changes.

T2 fat-suppressed imaging: useful for detecting synovitis and joint effusion.

Gradient echo (GRE) or susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI): detect chronic blood products (hemosiderin), with SWI being more sensitive and able to identify earlier blood deposits.

Several scoring systems exist for the assessment of hemophilic arthropathy, including the European scoring system and the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI scale. The IPSG system provides more detailed scoring and greater sensitivity for early disease, including subtle synovial changes. For radiographs, the most widely used system is the Pettersson radiographic scoring system.

In this study, the investigators will use the IPSG MRI scoring system and the Pettersson X-ray scoring system to evaluate hemophilic arthropathy, with the aim of improving grading, management, and follow-up.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

95

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The study population will include patients diagnosed with hemophilia A or hemophilia B who are at risk of, or clinically suspected to have, hemophilic arthropathy of the knee joint. Participants will be recruited from hematology and orthopedic clinics.

Eligible participants will undergo knee MRI to assess for:

Synovial abnormalities (e.g., hypertrophy, hemosiderin deposition)

Cartilaginous changes (thinning, erosions)

Osseous changes (subchondral cysts, bone erosions, marrow changes)

Intra-articular bleeding

MRI scoring systems will be applied to quantify disease severity and to evaluate the role of MRI as a tool for supporting therapeutic decisions and monitoring treatment response.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient ( more than 18 years old ) diagnosed as Haemophilia with history of bleeding in knee joint more than once

Exclusion Criteria:

  • *contraindications for MRI such as claustrophobia , metallic foriegn body carriers , cardiac pacemaker

    • patient refused the exam
    • Pregnant female patients

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
MRI in Knee Hemophilic Arthopathy
Participants diagnosed with hemophilia and clinical suspicion of knee arthropathy will undergo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the affected knee. MRI will be performed using standardized sequences to evaluate joint changes, including synovial hypertrophy, hemosiderin deposition, cartilage thinning, and bone damage. Findings will be scored using the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI scoring system.
Xray in Knee Hemophilic Arthropathy
Participants diagnosed with hemophilia and clinical suspicion of knee arthropathy will undergo conventional radiography (X-ray) of the affected knee. Standard anteroposterior and lateral views will be obtained to evaluate joint changes, including joint space narrowing, osteoporosis, subchondral cysts, erosions, and bone deformities. Findings will be scored using the Pettersson X-ray scoring system.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI Score for Hemophilic Arthropathy
Time Frame: After completion of MRI scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (for recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).
Assessment of knee hemophilic arthropathy severity using the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI scoring system. This scoring system evaluates early and advanced joint changes such as synovial hypertrophy, hemosiderin deposition, and cartilage/bone damage.
After completion of MRI scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (for recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pettersson X-ray Score for Hemophilic Arthropathy
Time Frame: After completion of X-ray scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).
Assessment of knee hemophilic arthropathy severity using the Pettersson X-ray scoring system. This system evaluates joint space narrowing, osteoporosis, subchondral cysts, erosions, and bone deformities to quantify the degree of arthropathy.
After completion of X-ray scanning session (within the same study visit). Overall Study Duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).
Agreement Between MRI and X-ray Scoring Systems in Hemophilic Arthropathy
Time Frame: After completion of MRI and X-ray scanning sessions (within the same study visit). Overall study duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).
To evaluate the agreement between the International Prophylaxis Study Group (IPSG) MRI score and the Pettersson X-ray score in assessing the severity of knee hemophilic arthropathy. This outcome will determine the level of concordance between the two imaging modalities in detecting joint changes.
After completion of MRI and X-ray scanning sessions (within the same study visit). Overall study duration: 2 years (including recruitment, imaging, and data analysis).

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on MRI

Subscribe