Randomized, Sham-Controlled Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis in Individuals With Peripheral Neuropathy (MYN-L001-001)

July 13, 2026 updated by: MYNERVA AG

Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Multicenter Investigation of the Leia Sensory Prosthesis on Gait and Balance in Peripheral Neuropathy.

This study will evaluate a wearable device intended to support balance and gait in adults with peripheral neuropathy. Participants will use the device for a defined period, and outcomes related to safety, usability, and functional performance will be assessed.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This clinical investigation will assess a non-invasive wearable device designed to enhance gait and balance in individuals with peripheral neuropathy. The study will evaluate whether the device can improve balance and gait stability during daily activities, and will also examine safety, comfort, and overall user acceptability over the study period.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Meyrin, Switzerland, 1217
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Hôpital de la Tour
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Christophe Perruchoud, PD Dr.
        • Contact:
      • Morges, Switzerland, 1110
        • Recruiting
        • Ensemble Hospitalier de la Côte (EHC)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Massimo Allegri, Dr.
      • Zurich, Switzerland, 8008
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Universitätsklinik Balgrist
        • Contact:
          • Carl Zipser, PD Dr. med.
          • Phone Number: +41 44 386 3901
          • Email: zfp@balgrist.ch
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Patrick Freund, Prof. Dr. med.

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent prior to any study procedure
  • Adults ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical diagnosis of peripheral neuropathy, confirmed per site procedures and neurophysiological testing (e.g. NCV)
  • Gait or balance difficulties as self-reported and confirmed by Functional Gait Assessment (FGA score ≤ 23) and/or single-leg stance < 30 seconds
  • Able to walk without walking aids
  • Stable supplements and medications ≥ 1 month before baseline and willing to maintain stability during the investigation (same dosage and same medication within the last month)
  • Willingness and ability to attend weekly sessions, perform home use, and return for follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated/unhealed lesion of any kind (e.g., wounds, swelling, infection, inflamed area of skin or eruptions on the lower leg (foot and ankle) or near product use (e.g., untreated lymphedema, phlebitis, thrombo-phlebitis or varicose veins)
  • Untreated/unhealed fractures in the foot and ankle
  • Cancerous growth in the planned treatment area
  • Severe peripheral vascular disease (e.g., gangrene)
  • Cognitive impairment that precludes informed consent or device use
  • Implanted electrical devices or pacemakers
  • Lower-limb orthoses/braces that cannot be removed for assessments
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding females
  • Usage of other medical devices for the relief of neuropathic symptoms during the study
  • Current participation in any other clinical study using an investigational device or investigational drug
  • Orthopedic conditions substantially limiting gait (e.g., failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS), recent hip or knee replacement, unstable fractures) as judged by the investigator
  • For patients who have been randomized in the active treatment group only: Incapability to perceive somatotopic sensations (tested at screening by MYNERVA staff)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Active Device
Participants use the active wearable device during the study period.
A non-invasive wearable device used to assess balance, gait, and usability in individuals with peripheral neuropathy.
Sham Comparator: Sham Device
Participants use a sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.
A sham version of the wearable device without active functionality.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score
Time Frame: Change in Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score from baseline (day 0) to day 56.
The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks.
Change in Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score from baseline (day 0) to day 56.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) total score
Time Frame: From baseline (day 0) to the end of the supervised period (day 28), change from day 28 to day 56, and evaluation of evolution across all timepoints, with and without stimulation
The FGA is a validated clinical scale that assesses gait function and balance under various walking tasks. To gain additional knowledge on whether there are changes between supervised and home-use phase
From baseline (day 0) to the end of the supervised period (day 28), change from day 28 to day 56, and evaluation of evolution across all timepoints, with and without stimulation
Timed-up and Go (TUG) in seconds
Time Frame: Change from Baseline to day 56
The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility. Participants are instructed to stand up from a chair, walk 3 metres at their usual pace, turn around, walk back to the chair, and sit down. The time from the command to start until the participant is seated again is recorded in seconds. A shorter time indicates better functional mobility.
Change from Baseline to day 56
Neuropathic pain symptoms (NPSI questionnaire)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to each of the follow-up time points (day 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 80)
Captures changes in neuropathic pain intensity and quality.
Change from baseline to each of the follow-up time points (day 7, 14, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56 and 80)
Quality of life (NORFOLK QOL-DN, EQ-5D-5L questionnaire)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Evaluates impact of intervention on daily function and well-being.
Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Sensory function - Monofilament test
Time Frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28 and 56)
Sensitivity to pressure and touch
Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28 and 56)
Sensory function - Rydel-Seiffer tuning fork test
Time Frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28, and 56)
Semiquantitative measurement of vibration perception
Change from baseline value from day 7 pre-stimulation to follow-up time points (day 28, and 56)
Sensory function - Sudoscan (subset of patients)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to day 56
Evaluates peripheral sensory function and small-fiber integrity.
Change from baseline to day 56
Impact on fall risk: fall questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Assessment of previous falls and falls during the study
Change from baseline to day 28, day 56 and day 80
Neuroimaging (MRI) (subset of patients)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to day 56
Exploratory mechanistic endpoint assessing effects of stimulation.
Change from baseline to day 56
Treatment compliance
Time Frame: Through home use phase of 4 weeks
Based on the device logs that contain information on when treatment has been performed by the patients, patient's treatment compliance will be assessed.
Through home use phase of 4 weeks
Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): step length in cm
Time Frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): step width in cm
Time Frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): center of mass sway in cm
Time Frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Objective gait parameters (Movement Lab): heel-strike force in Newton
Time Frame: Baseline, day 28 and day 56
Provides quantitative kinematic evidence of gait stability.
Baseline, day 28 and day 56

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Exploratory - Sensory function - Temperature measurement using the thermal imaging camera
Time Frame: Change from baseline value from day 7 prestimulation to follow-up time points day 28 and 56
Temperature distribution in the feet)
Change from baseline value from day 7 prestimulation to follow-up time points day 28 and 56
Safety Outcome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
All Adverse events (AEs): incidence, severity, seriousness, relatedness to device/procedures
through study completion, an average of 4 months
Safety Outcome
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 4 months
All Device deficiencies: number, type, corrective actions
through study completion, an average of 4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 3, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 13, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MYN-L001-001
  • Unique Device Identifiers (Other Identifier: GS1)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peripheral Neuropathy

Clinical Trials on Active wearable device

Subscribe