Effects of DMI vs Bobath on Neuromuscular Development in CP (DMINDTSCP)

January 8, 2026 updated by: Prof. Dr. Shoaib Waqas, Lahore University of Biological and Applied Sciences

Comparative Effects of Dynamic Movement Intervention and Bobath Approach on Neuromuscular Development in Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a leading cause of permanent motor disability in children, resulting from non-progressive disturbances to the developing brain. Prematurity and low birth weight are major risk factors, with infants under 1500 g having a markedly higher risk. Spastic CP is the most common subtype, and spastic diplegia accounts for 30-40% of cases, primarily affecting the lower limbs and trunk control. CP prevalence has declined in high-income countries but remains higher in low- and middle-income regions, including Pakistan. Beyond clinical challenges, CP imposes a substantial lifelong economic burden. Current management follows the ICF framework, emphasizing function, participation, and independence. Traditional approaches such as the Bobath method show limited evidence compared with task-oriented therapies. Dynamic Movement Intervention (DMI) is a neuroplasticity-based, task-oriented approach emphasizing repetitive functional activities. Trunk-focused dynamic training has shown superior improvements in balance and gross motor function. However, comparative evidence between DMI and Bobath therapy in young children is limited, necessitating further research using validated outcome measures.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Cerebral palsy (CP) is a major cause of permanent motor disability in childhood and is defined as a group of non-progressive disorders affecting movement and posture due to disturbances in the developing fetal or infant brain. Its etiology is multifactorial, with prematurity and low birth weight identified as the strongest risk factors. Population-based European studies indicate that infants weighing less than 1500 g at birth have up to a 70-fold greater risk of developing CP compared with those born weighing over 2500 g.

Spastic CP is the most prevalent subtype, with spastic diplegia accounting for approximately 30-40% of cases. This subtype primarily affects the lower extremities and is characterized by increased muscle tone, poor trunk control, and persistent limitations in functional mobility. Clinical presentation varies from isolated motor deficits in focal brain injury to complex impairments involving sensory, cognitive, communicative, and behavioral domains when brain involvement is extensive.

Recent meta-analyses report a decline in CP prevalence in high-income countries to approximately 1.6 per 1,000 live births, whereas substantially higher rates, up to 3.4 per 1,000 live births, persist in low- and middle-income countries. In Pakistan, regional data from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa report a prevalence of 1.22 per 1,000 live births, with a male predominance. Beyond clinical impact, CP imposes a considerable economic burden, with estimated lifetime costs exceeding USD 860,000 per affected individual.

Current CP management aligns with the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) framework, emphasizing activity, participation, and functional independence. Although early intervention benefits cognitive outcomes, sustained improvements in motor function remain inconsistent. Traditional neurodevelopmental approaches, particularly the Bobath method, focus on tone regulation and movement facilitation; however, systematic reviews indicate limited evidence supporting their superiority over task-oriented therapies. Consequently, contemporary guidelines advocate for evidence-based, goal-directed interventions that yield meaningful functional outcomes.

Dynamic Movement Intervention (DMI) is a task-based therapeutic approach grounded in neuroplasticity principles, emphasizing repetitive, progressive, and functionally relevant activities. Given the proximal-to-distal pattern of motor development, trunk control is fundamental for balance, coordination, and mobility. Evidence suggests that trunk-focused training on dynamic surfaces enhances postural control, sensory integration, and gross motor function more effectively than static surface exercises. Task-oriented training further promotes motor learning through repetition of meaningful activities, facilitating adaptive reorganization of motor pathways.

Randomized trials and systematic reviews support the effectiveness of trunk-targeted and task-oriented interventions in improving trunk stability, balance, and gross motor function in children with CP. However, direct comparisons between DMI and the Bobath approach remain limited, particularly in young children with spastic diplegic CP. Moreover, the Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS), a validated predictor of functional mobility, has been underutilized as a primary outcome measure. This study aims to address these gaps by comparing the effects of DMI and Bobath therapy on neuromuscular development in children aged 2-4 years with spastic diplegic CP using validated outcome measures, including the GMFM-88, SSDT, and TIS.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

58

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
        • Recruiting
        • Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy.
  • Gross Motor Function Measurement Scale (GMFC) level I to III.
  • Children who have head control.
  • Ability to understand and follow simple instructions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Visual or hearing impairments (e.g., cataract, myopia, deafness).
  • Cognitive problems impacting participation.
  • Uncontrolled convulsions or recent seizure activity.
  • Orthopedic surgeries of the lower limbs, such as dorsal rhizotomy within the last year.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group A
Participants will receive Dynamic Movement Intervention (DMI) consisting of task-specific, structured, repetitive, and progressively challenging exercises designed to improve neuromuscular control. The intervention will be delivered for 12 weeks, with evaluations at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 6), and post-intervention (week 12). DMI sessions will include dynamic tasks such as rolling on soft or unstable surfaces to promote trunk rotation and segmental control; sitting balance training on therapy balls or foam pads with perturbations to activate trunk and head righting responses; and trunk stability exercises in quadruped and kneeling positions to enhance coordination and proprioception. Standing activities on balance discs or BOSU balls will target weight shifting, small squats, and multidirectional reaching for balance control, while walking tasks on varied surfaces(foam mats, tactile paths and beams)will challenge gait, coordination, and postural alignment.
Active Comparator: Group B
Participants in this group will receive therapy based on the Bobath Concept (Neurodevelopmental Treatment), an evidence-informed, problem-solving approach designed to facilitate normal movement patterns, inhibit abnormal tone, and improve postural control and functional mobility in children with spastic cerebral palsy. The intervention will be implemented over 12 weeks, with evaluations at baseline (week 0), mid-intervention (week 6), and post-intervention (week 12). The Bobath approach emphasizes individualized handling and facilitation techniques aimed at enhancing postural alignment, balance reactions, and coordinated functional movements. The therapist uses guided facilitation at key points of control-such as the pelvis, trunk, and shoulders-to promote normal movement synergies and reduce the influence of spasticity or abnormal reflex patterns.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Gross Motor Function Measure-88 (GMFM-88)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A standardized observational tool used to assess changes in gross motor function across five dimensions, including lying, sitting, crawling, standing, and walking, specifically designed for children with cerebral palsy.
12 weeks
Shoaib Sensorimotor Development Tool (SSDT)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A specialized tool designed to assess sensorimotor development in children, including sensory integration, motor planning, and coordination. It provides insight into neuromotor function beyond gross motor skills.
12 weeks
Trunk Impairment Scale (TIS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Evaluates trunk control through assessments of static sitting balance, dynamic sitting balance, and trunk coordination. It is essential for measuring core stability and postural control improvements.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Cerebral Palsy Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children (CP QOL-Child)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
A validated caregiver-reported questionnaire that evaluates health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy. It covers emotional well-being, social participation, physical health, and overall life satisfaction.
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 10, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 10, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

November 20, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

January 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 8, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bobath Therapy

Clinical Trials on Dynamic Movement Intervention

Subscribe