- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07239752
Influence of Maintaining Apical Patency on Post-Endodontic Pain in Molars (IMAP-Pain)
Influence of Maintaining Apical Patency in Post-Endodontic Pain in Molars With Necrotic Pulp and Apical Periodontitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND: Post-operative pain remains a significant challenge in endodontics, impacting patient satisfaction. The clinical practice of maintaining apical patency-passively keeping the apical foramen patent with a small file-is debated, with conflicting evidence on its impact on post-endodontic pain. This study aims to provide clear evidence from a robust randomized controlled trial.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of maintaining apical patency on the intensity and duration of post-endodontic pain in molars with necrotic pulp and apical periodontitis.
METHODS:
Study Design: Single-center, randomized, controlled, parallel-group trial.
Setting: Department of Operative Dentistry, Saidu College of Dentistry, Swat.
Participants: 48 adult patients (aged 18-65, ASA I/II) with a single permanent molar diagnosed with necrotic pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis. Patients with prior endodontic treatment, complex anatomy, systemic illness, pregnancy, recent analgesic use, or non-restorable teeth will be excluded.
Intervention:
Patency Group (Experimental): Following determination of working length with an electronic apex locator (verified radiographically), a pre-curved size #10 K-file will be passively advanced 1.0 mm beyond the major apical foramen before and after each successive instrumentation size.
Non-Patency Group (Active Comparator): Instrumentation will be carefully confined to the root canal space and will not proceed beyond the apical foramen.
Procedure: All participants will receive single-visit root canal treatment under local anesthesia and rubber dam isolation. Cleaning and shaping will be performed using a rotary instrument system. Irrigation will be performed with sodium hypochlorite and EDTA. Obturation will be completed with gutta-percha and sealer via a standardized technique, followed by a composite restoration.
Outcome Measure: The primary outcome is post-operative pain intensity, measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Patients will self-record their pain levels at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours post-operatively.
Data Analysis: Data will be analyzed using SPSS Statistics v25. Descriptive statistics will summarize the data. The distribution of pain severity categories will be compared using the Chi-square test. Mean VAS scores between groups will be compared using independent samples t-tests (assuming normal distribution). A p-value of < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Faiz Rahman, BDS
- Phone Number: +923451505838
- Email: faizr3702@gmail.com
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:Adult patients aged 18-65 years.
Medically healthy, classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I or II.
Presence of a single permanent molar tooth diagnosed with necrotic pulp and symptomatic apical periodontitis, and indicated for primary root canal treatment.
Patients who provide informed written consent to participate in the study. -
Exclusion Criteria:
Teeth with prior endodontic treatment or complex anatomy (e.g., calcified canals, severe curvature).
Patients with significant systemic illness (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes, immunocompromised status) or pregnancy.
History of analgesic intake within 72 hours prior to the root canal procedure.
Non-restorable teeth, teeth with severe periodontal disease (pocket depth >5mm), or teeth with root fractures.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Triple
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patency Group
: A #10 K-file is passively advanced 1.0 mm beyond the major apical foramen before and after each successive instrumentation size to maintain patency.
|
The procedural technique of passively advancing a small endodontic file (size #10 K-file) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen before and after each larger instrument during root canal cleaning and shaping.
This is done to prevent blockage of the apical portion of the canal.
Root canal instrumentation that is strictly confined to the canal space, terminating at the apical constriction (working length) and avoiding any instrumentation beyond the apical foramen.
|
|
Active Comparator: Non-Patency Group
Participants in this group will receive standard root canal treatment where instruments are carefully confined to the root canal space and do not proceed beyond the apical foramen.
All other aspects of the treatment are identical to the Experimental arm.
|
The procedural technique of passively advancing a small endodontic file (size #10 K-file) 1 mm beyond the apical foramen before and after each larger instrument during root canal cleaning and shaping.
This is done to prevent blockage of the apical portion of the canal.
Root canal instrumentation that is strictly confined to the canal space, terminating at the apical constriction (working length) and avoiding any instrumentation beyond the apical foramen.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 6 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
6 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure
|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity at 6 hours
Time Frame: 6 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure.
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
6 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure.
|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity at 12 hours
Time Frame: 12 hours
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
12 hours
|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity at 48 hours
Time Frame: 48 hours
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
48 hours
|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 12 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
12 hours after the completion of the root canal procedure
|
|
Post-operative Pain Intensity
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Pain level measured using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale (VAS).
Patients self-report by marking a line on a 100-mm horizontal scale, where 0 mm = "no pain" and 100 mm = "worst imaginable pain".
The score is the distance in mm from the left anchor.
|
24 hours
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
ncidence of Post-operative Pain Severity
Time Frame: Assessed at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure
|
The proportion of participants in each group reporting different levels of pain severity, categorized based on their VAS scores.
The categories are: No Pain (VAS = 0 mm), Moderate Pain (VAS = 1-54 mm), and Severe Pain (VAS = 55-100 mm).
|
Assessed at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure
|
|
ncidence of Post-operative Pain Severity
Time Frame: Assessed at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure. The data from all time points will be aggregated to compare the overall distribution of pain severity between groups.
|
The proportion of participants in each group reporting different levels of pain severity, categorized based on their VAS scores.
The categories are: No Pain (VAS = 0 mm), Moderate Pain (VAS = 1-54 mm), and Severe Pain (VAS = 55-100 mm).
|
Assessed at 6, 12, 24, 48, and 72 hours after the procedure. The data from all time points will be aggregated to compare the overall distribution of pain severity between groups.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- SCD-Endo-Patency-001
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Periapical Periodontitis
-
Celalettin TopbaşCompletedPeriapical Periodontitis, Chronic NonsuppurativeTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of Health Sciences LahoreNot yet recruiting
-
Mustafa Kemal UniversityRecruitingApical Periodontitis | Periapical Lesion HealingTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Faiz ur rahmanNot yet recruitingPeriapical Periodontitis | Periapical Lesion
-
Duygu DegirmenciogluNot yet recruitingApical PeriodontitisTurkey (Türkiye)
-
University of ZagrebActive, not recruitingApical PeriodontitisCroatia
-
TC Erciyes UniversityRecruiting
-
Marmara UniversityMarmara University Scientific Research Projects UnitRecruitingApical Periodontitis | Periapical DiseasesTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakNot yet recruitingApical PeriodontitisIndia
-
Hilal Çuhadar BeşiroğluCompletedApical PeriodontitisTurkey (Türkiye)
Clinical Trials on Patency Group
-
University Hospital OstravaUniversity of OstravaRecruitingNasal Obstruction | Pituitary Adenoma InvasiveCzechia
-
Cukurova UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain After Endodontic TreatmentTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Woman's Health University Hospital, EgyptCompleted
-
Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences RohtakCompletedApical Periodontitis
-
Prime FoundationCompletedPain, Postoperative | Acute PainPakistan
-
Cairo UniversityZagazig UniversityCompletedPostoperative PainEgypt
-
National University of Medical Sciences, PakistanCompleted
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterNot yet recruiting
-
Isparta Military HospitalCompleted
-
Sucampo Pharma Americas, LLCSucampo AG; Sucampo Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedChronic Idiopathic ConstipationUnited States