Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment (patency)

March 14, 2022 updated by: Heba Elasfouri, Cairo University

Influence of Apical Patency Concept Upon Postoperative Pain After Root Canal Treatment in Molars With Pulpal Disease. A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

The aim of this clinical study is to evaluate the influence of apical patency concept implementation upon postoperative pain following root canal treatment in a single visit approach in molars with pulpal disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

All patients will be treated in a single session approach regardless of the group. All molars will be anesthetized either through infiltration in case of maxillary molars or inferior alveolar nerve block in case of mandibular molars using Octocaine 2% with epinephrine 1: 100,000 (Lidocaine HCl, Novocol Pharmaceutical, Ontario, Canada.). Rubber dam will be applied; and access will be opened using Endo access bur.

Canals will be scouted using manual patency file in a watch winding maneuver and then coronal flaring will be performed using Gates Glidden drill #3 in a brushing motion away from dangerous zone. Root canals will be copiously irrigated using 10 ml 2.5% sodium hypochlorite NaOCl (Clorox; Egyptian Company for household bleach, Egypt) delivered using 28 Gauge safety Steri Irrigation Tip (DiaDent Group International, Burnaby, BC, Canada) inserted 3 mm below cementoenamel junction. Working length will be determined using electronic apex locator Root ZX II (J. Morita Mfg. Corp, Kyoto, Japan) and confirmed radiographically using parallel technique with receptor holding device. Canals will be irrigated again with 10ml 1.5% NaOCl, which will be delivered 2mm coronal to apical canal terminus. Irrigation will be hydro-dynamically agitated with EndoActivator device (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland) using yellow tips #20/06 inserted 2mm short of working length for 60 seconds. Root canals will be shaped using ProTaper next rotary Ni-Ti files (Dentsply Maillefer, Baillagues, Switzerland). In Gp A, apical patency will be maintained till obturation using electronic apex locator confirmed radiographically while in Gp B apical patency will not be maintained. Finally, Root canals will be obturated using cold lateral compaction technique. The molars will be permanently restored using composite resin restoration and will be scheduled for extra coronal restoration.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dokki
      • Giza, Dokki, Egypt, 12611
        • Heba ahmed ElAsfouri

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • •1. Patient age between 18-60 years old.

    • 2. Both males and females will be included.
    • 3. All patients are in a good health without systemic condition.
    • 4. The offending tooth is a molar.
    • 5. The offending molar is indicated for root canal treatment.
    • 6. One molar for every patient.
    • 7. All patients will sign an informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. The offending tooth has previous attempt of pulp therapy or root canal treatment.

    • 2. The patient showing any clinical or radiographic evidence of periapical pathosis.
    • 3. Patients received analgesics or systemic antibiotic prior to treatment.
    • 4. Immunocompromised patients.
    • 5. Any unknown infectious disease (e.g. HBV, HCV, HIV, or T.B.)
    • 6. History of cancer with radio or chemotherapy.
    • 7. Offending molar with mobility score ≥2.
    • 8. Offending molar with pocket depth ≥6mm.
    • 9. Immature molars.
    • 10. Nonodontogenic pain.
    • 11. Patients with more than one tooth requiring endodontic intervention.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Apical aptency
In Gp A, apical patency will be maintained till obturation using electronic apex locator confirmed radiographically
In Gp A, apical patency will be maintained till obturation using electronic apex locator confirmed radiographically. Finally, Root canals will be obturated using cold lateral compaction technique. The molars will be permanently restored using composite resin restoration and will be scheduled for extra coronal restoration.
Active Comparator: Non-apical patency
in Gp B apical patency will not be maintained
in Gp B apical patency will not be maintained. Finally, Root canals will be obturated using cold lateral compaction technique. The molars will be permanently restored using composite resin restoration and will be scheduled for extra coronal restoration

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
postoperative pain intensity using numerical rating scale
Time Frame: after 6 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain after root canal treatment
after 6 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain intensity using numerical rating scale
Time Frame: after12 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain after root canal treatment
after12 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain intensity using numerical rating scale
Time Frame: after 24 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain after root canal treatment
after 24 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain intensity using numerical rating scale
Time Frame: after 48 hours after root canal treatment
postoperative pain after root canal treatment
after 48 hours after root canal treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Heba A ElAsfouri, AssProfessor, Cairo University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 30, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 14, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Endo 27-11-2021

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Postoperative Pain

Clinical Trials on apical patency

3
Subscribe