Lumbal Erector Spinae Plane Block for Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty

November 16, 2025 updated by: Olfa kaabachi, MD, University Tunis El Manar

Ultrasound-Guided Lumbal Erector Spinae Plane Block on Postoperative Pain Management After Total Hip Arthroplasty

The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block or spinal erector block was first described in September 2016 by a Canadian team. It's a block that was initially used for the treatment of chronic thoracic neuropathic pain. The ESP block is one of the inter-fascicular blocks and it's an easy-to-perform technique.In the literature, it has been reported that Lumbar ESPB provides effective analgesia after a hip surgery.

The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the analgesic effects of the ultrasound-guided lumbar Erector Spinae Plane block on postoperative pain management versus the multimodal analgesia after total hip arthroplasty.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients aged more than 18 years, ASA I-III scheduled for primary total hip arthroplasty with lateral approach and under general anesthesia Patients were randomly assigned, into 1 of 2 groups, namely, group ESPBL and group Placebo, using sealed envelopes

  • For ESPBL group: Lumbar ESP block performed after anesthesia induction. A low-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L4 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle (100 mm, 22G) will be inserted cranio-caudal direction and following confirmation of the correct position of the needle, between the erectorspinae muscle and the transverse process,30 ml of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine/0.2% ropivacaine) will be administered for the block.
  • For Placebo group: patients had multimodal analgesia without lumbar ESP block Patients will be transferred to continuous care unit for 24 hours.

Post-operative analgesia will include:

  1. Paracetamol 1g IV every 8 hours for 1 day then oral paracetamol 1g every 8 hours for 4 weeks.
  2. Diclofenac sodium(50mg) 1 tablet x 2 per day for 5 days.
  3. PCA morphine (Patient Controlled Analgesia), as a rescue analgesia, programmed as: Bolus of 1mg/ refractory period of 10 min/ maximum dose set up at 10mg every 12h.

The primary outcome of the study is to compare postoperative opioids consumption in the first 24 postoperative hours.

Secondary endpoints:

Secondary outcomes are: intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, sitting position and adverse effects related to opioids.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: KAABACHI OLFA

Study Locations

      • Manouba, Tunisia, 2010
        • Recruiting
        • Kassab Orthopedic Institute
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • primary total hip arthroplasty with lateral approach and under general anesthesia .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Contraindication or refusal to regional anesthesia

    • Contraindication to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID's)
    • Allergy to opioids
    • Allergy to paracetamol
    • Creatinine clearance < 30ml/min
    • Weight<50 kg or >100kg
    • Psychiatric disorders and difficulty of communication
    • Lower limb neurological deficit
    • Patients undergoing bilateral or revision total hip replacement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Sequential Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: hip arthroplasty with nerve block
Lumbar ESP block performed after anesthesia induction. A low-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L4 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle (100 mm, 22G) will be inserted cranio-caudal direction and following confirmation of the correct position of the needle, between the erectorspinae muscle and the transverse process,30 ml of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine/0.2% ropivacaine) will be administered for the block
Lumbar ESP block performed after anesthesia induction. A low-frequency ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally 2-3 cm lateral to the L4 transverse process. Erector spinae muscle will be visualized on the hyperechoic transverse process. The block needle (100 mm, 22G) will be inserted cranio-caudal direction and following confirmation of the correct position of the needle, between the erectorspinae muscle and the transverse process,30 ml of local anesthetic (0.25% bupivacaine/0.2% ropivacaine) will be administered for the block.
Placebo Comparator: hip arthroplasty with intravenous pain killers
intravenous pain killers
intravenous pain killers

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
morphine consumption
Time Frame: Day 1
total morphine dose
Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
pain scores
Time Frame: Hour 2, Hour 4, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18, Hour 24 and on Day 2 and Day 7.
numerical pain rating scale [1 to 10 worse outcome]
Hour 2, Hour 4, Hour 6, Hour 12, Hour 18, Hour 24 and on Day 2 and Day 7.
intraoperative opioid consumption
Time Frame: end of surgery
total fentanyl dose
end of surgery
pain on sitting position
Time Frame: Day 1
numerical pain rating scale [1 to 10 worse outcome]
Day 1
QR 9 score
Time Frame: Day 2
quality of recovery score [0 to 18 best outcome]
Day 2
ROM
Time Frame: Day 1
Range of mouvement [0° to 90°best outcome]
Day 1
pain during walk
Time Frame: Day 7
numerical pain rating scale [1 to 10 worse outcome]
Day 7

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 7, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 1, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

Last Verified

May 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IMKO-CE 115/2024

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)

Clinical Trials on Lumbal Erector Spinae Plane Block

Subscribe