Evaluation of a Customizable Antibiotic Stewardship Program Tailored to French Nursing Homes (ORANEAT)

November 17, 2025 updated by: Nelly Agriner, University of Lorraine

Evaluation of A Customizable Antibiotic Stewardship Program Based on a Comprehensive Assessment of Organizations and Health Professionals' Attitudes, and Tailored to French Nursing Homes' Needs

To tackle antimicrobial resistance (AMR), i.e., one of the top 10 global health threats, antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs, i.e., coherent sets of actions promoting responsible use of antimicrobials, have been developed. Despite growing evidence about their effectiveness, their implementation remains suboptimal. Qualifying as complex interventions, these programs are prone to interactions with context, potentially compromising their successful transfer to other settings. AMR remains critical in French nursing homes (NHs). AMS programs have proven effective in reducing antimicrobial resistance in hospitals and in NHs. However, the evidence is inconsistent across studies in NHs and mostly based on North American and North European AMS programs and studies, raising concerns about transferability that might occur while implementing such AMS programs in French NHs. For instance, health systems and NH funding and organization vary considerably across countries, resulting in potential key determinants driving antibiotic use in such facilities in some countries that might remain untargeted by AMS programs developed in other countries. In addition, inconsistent effectiveness of AMS programs in NHs might also result from implementation issues, raising concerns about the strategies used to implement such programs. Based on extensive logic models linking psychosocial and organizational determinants driving antibiotic use in NHs of diverse countries, we developed and pilot-tested a customizable AMS program (i.e., the ORANEAT program) suited to French NHs, including three major components: (i) a contextual diagnostic regarding AMS in the targeted NH; (ii) based on the results of the contextual diagnostic, a bundle of tools selected from an AMS-toolkit including actions and tools suited to French NH setting; and (iii) implementation support relying on French structures involved in tackling AMR (i.e., CRAtb and CPias).

This study aims to assess the effectiveness, the sustainability, the implementation, and the transferability of the ORANEAT program in French NHs, using a mixed-method approach (quantitative and qualitative data). A cluster randomized controlled trial with two arms (ORANEAT program vs. no specific intervention) will be conducted; the cluster being the NH. The primary outcome to measure the effectiveness is total antibiotic use expressed in defined daily doses/1000 resident-days/month.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

66

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Nursing homes

Inclusion criteria:

• Nursing home located in one of the geographical areas participating in the study in two French regions (i.e., geographical areas covered by experts in antibiotic stewardship and/or in infection prevention and control who agreed to participate in the study)

Exclusion criteria:

  • Nursing home with a pharmacy for internal use
  • Participation to the pilot study
  • Data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database (Système national des données de santé) not available on the study period
  • Refusal of the nursing director to participate in the study (for Arm 1 only)

Residents (Outcomes 1 to 4 and outcome 12)

Inclusion criteria:

• Resident aged 18 or more who had lived in one of the participating nursing homes during the study period.

Exclusion criteria:

/

Healthcare professionals (Outcomes 11, 13 and 15)

Inclusion criteria:

• Healthcare professionals aged 18 or more working in one of the participating nursing homes from Arm 1 (including healthcare professionals who provide services to or collaborate with the nursing home even if they are not on-site, e.g., private general practitioners, community pharmacists, microbiologists, and professionals responsible for the implementation support).

Exclusion criteria:

• Refusal to complete the self-administered questionnaires or to participate in qualitative investigations.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental group
Nursing homes in the experimental group will receive the ORANEAT antibiotic stewardship program.
The ORANEAT multifaceted customizable antibiotic stewardship program includes (i) a contextual diagnostic regarding AMS in the targeted NH; (ii) based on the results of the contextual diagnostic, a bundle of tools selected from an AMS-toolkit including actions and tools suited to French NH setting and covering the main CDC domains of AMS in NHs; and (iii) implementation support relying on French structures involved in tackling AMR (i.e., CRAtb and CPias).
No Intervention: Control group
Nursing homes in the control group will not receive the ORANEAT antibiotic stewardship program ("usual care").

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total antibiotic use (DDD)
Time Frame: 12 months

Total antibiotic use expressed in Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/1000 resident-days/month.

Measured using data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database.

12 months
Total antibiotic use (Number of prescriptions)
Time Frame: 12 months

As part of a sensibility analysis:

Total antibiotic use expressed in number of prescriptions/1000 resident-days/month.

Measured using data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database.

12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months

Number of hospital admissions/1000 resident-days and number of deaths/1000 resident-days among nusing home residents.

Measured using data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database.

12 months
Sustainability of the effectiveness
Time Frame: 24 months

Total antibiotic use expressed in Defined Daily Doses (DDD)/1000 resident-days/month.

As part of a sensitivity analysis: Total antibiotic use expressed in number of prescriptions/1000 resident-days/month.

Measured using data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database.

24 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Context of the intervention - Nursing homes' characteristics
Time Frame: At inclusion

Nursing homes' staff resources (number of coordinating physicians, nurses, assistant nurses and general practitioners).

Measured using data collected by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

At inclusion
Adoption of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months

Number of nursing homes included / number of nursing homes invited to participate in the intervention group * 100, by stratum.

Measured using data collected by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

12 months
Reach of the target population
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months

Number of copies provided to the nursing home, for each tool (initial number of copies and additional copies requested by the nursing home).

Measured using data collected by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Fidelity of the intervention
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months

Number of tools used / number of tools included in the bundle of tools, for each bundle.

Measured using data collected by the by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Dose of intervention
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Number of tools used for each target population. Measured using data collected by the by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.
Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Adaptation of the intervention
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months

Number of tools withdrawn from the bundle of tools or modified (in form and/or content) or added / number of tools initially proposed (for each bundle of tools and overall).

Measured using data collected by the by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Users' experiences of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
Users' experiences with the ORANEAT program assessed among coordinating physicians/nurses, nurses, assistant nurses and general practitioners using a questionnaire UREMs (User Reported Experience Measures) adapted from PREMs (Patient Reported Experience Measures) developed by the research team. This questionnaire was designed to measure the users reported experience of the intervention. A score ranging from 0 to 100 will be calculated; higher score means better experience.
12 months
Sustainability of the intervention
Time Frame: 12 months
Sustainability of the ORANEAT program assessed among coordinating physicians/nurses, nurses, assistant nurses and general practitioners using the NoMAD questionnaire (questionnaire based on the normalization process theory [NPT], measuring the normalization of complex healthcare interventions - Finch et al. 2018 - doi: 10.1186/s12874-018-0591-x). The NoMAD questionnaire includes three general items on the intervention answered on an 11-point Likert scale ranging from 0 to 10, and 20 items representing the four key constructs of NPT: coherence (4 items), cognitive participation (4 items), collective action (7 items), and reflexive monitoring (5 items) answered on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from strongly agree to strongly disagree. Mean scale scores will be calculated for each NoMAD construct as well as for the overall scale (20 items); higher scores mean higher degree of normalization.
12 months
Mechanisms of impact of the intervention - appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions
Time Frame: 12 months
Proxy indicators reflecting the appropriateness of antibiotic use in nursing homes (Asquier-Khati et al. 2023, doi:10.1093/jacamr/dlad037). These proxy indicators assess the appropriateness of prescriptions for urinary tract infections, seasonal variations in prescriptions, repeated prescriptions of fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins' route of administration, duration of treatment, rate of second-line antibiotics, and co-prescriptions with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
12 months
Mechanisms of impact of the intervention - prescriptions of urine cultures
Time Frame: 12 months
Number of urine cultures prescribed/1000 resident-days/month. Measured using data from the Health Insurance reimbursement database.
12 months
Mechanisms of impact of the intervention - nursing home professionals' knowledge, attitudes, practices and motivation
Time Frame: At inclusion, 6 and 12 months

Nursing home professionals' (coordinating physicians/nurses, nurses, assistant nurses and general practitioners) knowledge, attitudes, practices and motivation towards AMS. For each component (knowledge, attitudes, practices and motivation), a score ranging from 0 to 100 will be calculated; higher scores means more favorable position towards AMS.

Data collected through the questionnaires of the contextual diagnostic.

At inclusion, 6 and 12 months
Costs of the intervention
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months

Cost associated with the work provided by the professionals responsible for the implementation support, with printing and sending the ORANEAT program tools to the nursing homes, etc.

Measured using data collected by the by the research team through ad hoc standardized activity reports.

Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Context, mechanisms of impact, sustainability, implementation, and transferability of the intervention
Time Frame: Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months
Observations, semi-structured interviews, focus groups with professionals involved in the implementation of the ORANEAT program (coordinating physicians/nurses, nurses, assistant nurses, general practitioners, professionals responsible for the implementation support…).
Through the end of the intervention, an average of 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 30, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 17, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ANR-20-PAMR-0008
  • 21-841 (Other Identifier: CEEI IRB00003888, IORG0003254)
  • 2021/170 (Other Identifier: French Data Protection Authority)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD Sharing Plan Description: N/A

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Antibacterial Agents

Clinical Trials on The ORANEAT program

Subscribe