Adding Aprepitant to a Multimodal Strategy for the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting in High-risk Outpatient Surgical Patients

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are a frequent and debilitating complications after surgery, affecting up to 80% of patients at high risk in the absence of prophylaxis.

Despite the rigorous application of the recommendations from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) at CHUM, a recent local study reveals a prevalence of 25% PONV at home after outpatient surgery. However, the therapeutic options at home remain limited.

This study aims to evaluate if the addition of 40 mg aprepitant to a multimodal strategy for preventing PONV improves clinical outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing outpatient surgery.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) are common and debilitating complications that can occur after surgery. Their incidence is estimated to be around 30% in the general population and may reach up to 80% in high-risk patients in the absence of prevention, thus constituting a frequent and major source of dissatisfaction. In outpatient surgery, it is still assumed that postoperative outcomes are straightforward. However, this perception is based on a bias of ignorance, as postoperative outcomes are rarely measured after hospital discharge. However, recent studies suggest that nearly 40% of patients may present with PONV once at home. The symptoms are sometimes considered more debilitating than the postoperative pain itself. Although rarely serious, they have a considerable impact on patient satisfaction and the length of their recovery. In some studies, they even represent the main cause of readmission after outpatient surgery or failure of discharge, resulting in additional costs for the healthcare system.

This study aims to evaluate if the addition of 40 mg aprepitant to a multimodal strategy for preventing post operative nausea and vomitting improves clinical outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing outpatient surgery.

The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the complete response rate, defined as the absence of nausea, vomiting, or the need for rescue treatment within 48 hours following surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

260

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H2X 0A9
        • Recruiting
        • Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Maxim Roy, MD, FRCPC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 18 years and over, requiring an ambulatory surgery
  • at high risk of post-operative nausea and vomitting defined by at least 3 factors from the Apfel score, calculated just prior to the surgery (female sex; non smoker; previous nausea or vomitting post-op., or motion sickness; expected opioid consumption in postoperative care).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal or unable to consent
  • Suspected or documented allergy to aprepitant (emend)
  • Concomitant use of medication interacting via the cytochrome CYP3A4 with aprepitant (pimozide, terfenadine, astemizole, comtadin or cisapride).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Aprepitant
Participants will receive a 40 mg capsule of aprepitant, in addition to standard antiemetic prophylaxis.
Just before the patient is taken to the operating room, a single oral capsule of 40 mg of aprepitant will be given to the participant to evaluate the effectiveness of 40 mg of aprepitant in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in outpatient surgery. The protocol was chosen to determine whether adding aprepitant to a standard multimodal strategy provides a clinically measurable benefit compared to placebo.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Participants will receive a 40 mg capsule of placebo, in addition to standard antiemetic prophylaxis
Just before the patient is taken to the operating room, a single oral capsule of 40 mg of placebo will be given to the participant.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of complete response according to postoperative nausea and vomitting
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
The rate of 'complete response' (CR), defined as the proportion of patients who experienced no episodes of postoperative nausea or vomiting (PONV) and did not require rescue medication following the addition of 40mg of aprepitant to a multimodal prevention strategy for PONV in high-risk patients during the first 48 hours following surgery.
48 hours after the surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of recovery
Time Frame: Change between baseline (before surgery) and 48 hours after the surgery
QoR15 is a valid questionnaire to measure the quality of recovery after surgery and anaesthesia, which includes 15 questions. Each of the 15 items are scored by the patient from 0 (worst score) to 10 (optimal score), giving a lowest possible score of 0 (worst outcome), and a highest possible score of 150 (optimal outcome).
Change between baseline (before surgery) and 48 hours after the surgery
Incidence of side effects
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
The potential side effects related to the medication, such as fatigue, dizziness, headaches, abdominal bloating, dyspepsia, hiccups, constipation, or diarrhea will be collected.
48 hours after the surgery
Patient satisfaction
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
The overall patient satisfaction will be assessed on a visual analog scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents completally unsatisfied and 10 represents fully satisfied.
48 hours after the surgery
Severity and frequence of nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: At discharge from recovery room, usually 1h after the end of the surgery, 24 hours and 48 hours after the surgery
The severity of nausea will be assessed using a questionnaire called the Simplified Postoperative Nausea and Vomitting Severity Score (SPONVSS) which indicates the number of episodes of vomiting and regurgitations from 0 to 4, where 0 represents none, 1, 2 and 3 are the number of episodes and 4 being 4 episodes or more, at three different time points (upon discharge from the recovery room, at 24 and 48 hours after surgery).
At discharge from recovery room, usually 1h after the end of the surgery, 24 hours and 48 hours after the surgery
Medical economic impact
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
The medical economic impact will be evaluated in terms of cost-effectiveness by analyzing the hospital admission conversions from ambulatory to inpatient admission, calls to 811 for health advice or the CHUM Patient Health Line, returns to the emergency room, and unplanned medical consultations for reasons exclusively related to PONV. A Willingness to pay questionnaire with one hypothetical question will also be asked 48 hours after surgery.
48 hours after the surgery
Analgesic consumptions (Opioid and non opioid)
Time Frame: 48 hours after the surgery
The total opioid consumption will be recorded and expressed in morphine equivalent dose and the consumption of acetaminophen and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs will also be documented
48 hours after the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maxim Roy, MD, FRCPC, Centre Hospitalier de l'Universite de Montreal (CHUM)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 27, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 27, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Prevention

Clinical Trials on Aprepitant 40mg

Subscribe