Guided Distraction Movement (MOVING)

February 6, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Benefits of Guided Movement Using a Maraca of the Arm Opposite to the One Undergoing Venipuncture to Reduce Pain in Children Aged 1-3 Years: a Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this research is to evaluate the benefits of using a maraca to guide movement in order to reduce pain during venipuncture for blood sampling or infusion (insertion of a peripheral venous line) in children aged 1 to 3 years.

Pharmacological methods can reduce the pain associated with venipuncture, but they do not address all aspects of pain. Complementary methods have been studied, such as distraction.

According to the literature, interventions in which the child actively participates, with motor action, have been little explored before 3 years of age.

Encouraging children aged 1 to 3 years to perform a movement using a maraca of the arm opposite to the one undergoing venipuncture, in synchronisation with the venipuncture, in addition to current pharmacological methods, would be a simple active intervention.

This distraction method has never been studied. It could reduce pain, withdrawal reactions and also the need for restraint by caregivers, leading to better acceptance of treatment and a higher success rate.

During a multicentre randomized controlled trial conducted in France, the benefits of guided movement using a maraca of the arm opposite to the one undergoing venipuncture synchronised with venipuncture and combined with the usual practice, will be compared with the usual practice alone. 5000 caractères maximum

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pharmacological methods can reduce the pain associated with venipuncture, but they do not address all aspects of pain. Complementary methods have been studied, such as distraction.

According to the literature, distraction interventions are effective in limiting self-reported or reported pain but not behavioural pain. The studies involved children aged 3 years and older who were distracted using passive methods such as reading, listening or watching a video.

On the other hand, in children aged 1 month to 3 years, no passive strategy was found to reduce pain.

Interventions in which the child actively participates, with motor action, have been little explored before 3 years of age.

Encouraging children aged 1 to 3 years to perform a movement using a maraca of the arm opposite to the one undergoing venipuncture, in synchronisation with the venipuncture, in addition to current pharmacological methods, would be a simple active intervention.

This distraction method has never been studied. It could reduce pain, withdrawal reactions and also the need for restraint by caregivers, leading to better acceptance of treatment and a higher success rate.

Based on studies demonstrating the effectiveness of active and multisensory distraction strategies, the hypothesis is based on the fact that voluntary movement, by simultaneously soliciting vision and hearing, captures the child's attention sufficiently to reduce the perception of pain and withdrawal reactions, thereby limiting restraint.

The aim of this study is to evaluate benefits of guided movement using a maraca of the arm opposite to the one undergoing venipuncture synchronised with venipuncture and combined with the usual practice, compared with the usual practice alone in children aged 1 to 3 years.

Two groups will be compared during a multicentre randomized controlled trial conducted in France. One group will receive usual practice with pharmacological analgesia (anaesthetic cream and/or nitroxus). In the other group, the usual practice will be combined with guided movement using a maraca of the arm opposite to the one undergoing venipuncture synchronised with venipuncture.

The evaluation will also include a qualitative analysis of the perceptions of the intervention by the parents and professionals involved.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75012
        • Direction de la recherche et de l'innovation
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 1 to 3 years
  • with a venipuncture prescribed within the first 48 hours of hospitalization in general paediatrics or during a consultation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • motor disability of upper limbs
  • mental disability with neuromotor troubles
  • venipuncture or other invasive procedure (lumbar puncture or catheter insertion) within 2 hours prior to inclusion
  • more than 5 venipunctures within 48 hours prior to inclusion
  • clinical condition requiring emergency venous access

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Usual practice

In this arm, venipuncture will be performed according to usual care. The usual care recommended for young children is as follows:

  • The child is lying down, sitting or in a semi-setting position or in the arms of an adult (parent or health professional).
  • Parents are present if they wish. The child may have his or her cuddly toy.
  • Analgesia is administered using anaesthetic cream and, depending on the child and the department's routine, anaesthetic cream and/or nitroxusmay be added.
  • No distracting objects are used apart from the voice (whispers, unsung words) or reassuring gestures as in usual practice (e. g. caresses, gentle rocking ). No active distraction with a toy or a screen are offered.
  • The child's gestures may be restrained by the professional(s) if necessary, in accordance with the department's policies and current practices. 62 caractères maximum.

Facultatif si la description de l'intervention (cf. ci-dessous) décrit suffisamment le bras.

Experimental: Usual practice and active distraction.

Venipuncture will be performed according to the usual care with the addition of active distraction using the maraca.

Active distraction procedure: The nurse performing the venipuncture called the operator and a professional called the 'accompanying person' (nurse, nursing assistant or childcare assistant usually in charge of looking after or holding the child) sit on either side of the child.

  • At the start of the procedure, the accompanying person places the maraca in the child's hand and shows him/her that it makes a noise 30 seconds before the venipuncture. The accompanying person checks the movement of the child's hand by placing his/her own hand on the child's hand. He/she playfully suggests to the child to wait to make noise with the maraca by counting down 'on 3, we'll make noise'. This countdown allows coordination with the operator.
  • When the operator is ready to perform the venipuncture, the accompanying person invites the child to gently shake the maraca.

If the venipun

Active distraction procedure:

Venipuncture will be performed according to the usual care with the addition of active distraction using the maraca.

Active distraction procedure: The nurse performing the venipuncture called the operator and a professional called the 'accompanying person' (nurse, nursing assistant or childcare assistant usually in charge of looking after or holding the child) sit on either side of the child.

  • At the start of the procedure, the accompanying person places the maraca in the child's hand and shows him/her that it makes a noise 30 seconds before the venipuncture. The accompanying person checks the movement of the child's hand by placing his/her own hand on the child's hand. He/she playfully suggests to the child to wait to make noise with the maraca by counting down 'on 3, we'll make noise'. This countdown allows coordination with the operator.
  • When the operator is ready to perform the venipuncture, the accompanying person invites the child to gently sha

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain score evaluated from the video recording of the procedure using the FLACC scale,
Time Frame: Day 1

Pain score evaluated from the video recording of the procedure using the FLACC scale, completed between 2 minutes before the venipuncture and the end of the first venipuncture.

The assessment will be performed remotely and independently by two expert professionals.

Day 1

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Restraint evaluated using PRIC scale
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Immobility of the arm undergoing venipuncture evaluated using a numerical scale from 0 to 10 (in the absence of an internationally validated scale).
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Intensity of the arm withdrawal reaction during venipuncture evaluated using a numerical scale from 0 to 10 (in the absence of an internationally validated scale).
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Proportion of venipuncture successfully completed at the first attempt.
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1
Acceptability of intervention from the child's perspective
Time Frame: Day 1
Acceptability of intervention from the child's perspective, evaluated by parents and attending professionals (nurses, nursing assistants and childcare assistants ) using a numerical scale from 0 to 10.
Day 1
Qualitative evaluation conducted through semi-structured interviews with 15 parents (or parental couples) and 15 nurses, nursing assistants or childcare assistants who participated in the intervention.
Time Frame: Day 1
Day 1

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Bénédicte LOMBART, Paramedical coordinator, Assistance Publique - Hopitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 25, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 6, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • APHP241783
  • IDRCB 2025-A00034-45 (Other Identifier: ANSM)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Venipuncture Pain

Clinical Trials on Guided movement

Subscribe