- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07248982
High-Strength Suture vs. Traditional Tension Band for Patellar Fractures
Prospective Cohort Study of High-Strength Suture Modified Tension Band Technique for the Treatment of Patellar Fractures
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Patellar fractures account for approximately 1% of all fractures and are common in knee injuries. Traditional tension band fixation is widely used but associated with issues such as hardware migration, soft tissue irritation, and postoperative pain, impacting rehabilitation and quality of life. High-strength sutures offer improved biomechanical properties, flexibility, and reduced soft tissue damage. This study observes the clinical efficacy of high-strength suture modified tension band fixation compared to traditional methods through a prospective cohort design.
Patients admitted to Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital from February 2024 to February 2026 with patellar fractures undergoing surgery will be divided into two groups based on surgical method: Suture Fixation (SF) group and Screw-Cable Tension Band (SCTB) group. Follow-up will occur for 12 months, assessing outcomes such as postoperative VAS pain scores, Lysholm knee scores, ROM, SF-36 health surveys, surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and complications (e.g., infection, fixation failure, nonunion).
General data collected includes demographics (age, gender, height, weight, BMI), comorbidities (e.g., diabetes, hypertension, smoking), ASA classification, fracture details (side, type, displacement, mechanism, time from injury), and perioperative complications. Imaging assessments include fracture reduction quality (good, satisfactory, poor) via X-ray, healing time (weeks until fracture line blurs/disappears), and patellar height via Insall-Salvati index. Muscle strength (quadriceps via MMT, 0-5 grades) and patient satisfaction (1-5 scale) will also be evaluated.
Adverse events (AEs) and serious adverse events (SAEs) will be recorded, reported to the ethics committee, and managed promptly. Statistical analysis will use IBM SPSS Statistics 27.0, with t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square/Fisher's exact tests, Kaplan-Meier curves, and regressions as appropriate. Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis will be primary, with multiple imputation for missing data.
The study is feasible given the hospital's patient volume and the principal investigator's experience. Ethical principles follow the Helsinki Declaration, with informed consent and privacy protection. Results will be published in academic journals and presented at conferences.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Anning Liu, M.Med. (candidate)
- Phone Number: +8615259370989
- Email: jomt852@163.com
Study Locations
-
-
Fujian
-
Fuzhou, Fujian, China, 350001
- Recruiting
- Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital
-
Contact:
- Wei Xu, Dr
- Phone Number: +8613959116868
- Email: drxuwei@sina.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1.Age 18-55 years. 2.Radiographically confirmed patellar fracture (AO/OTA 34-C1 or 34-C2). 3.First-time patellar fracture surgery. 4.Time from injury to surgery ≤ 2 weeks. 5.Able to comply with follow-up and provide written informed consent. 6.Normal pre-injury knee function. 7.Able to tolerate surgery and agree to surgical treatment. 8.Intact cognitive function.
Exclusion Criteria:
1.Age <18 or >55 years. 2.Pathological fractures. 3.Prior patellar surgery or severe underlying patellofemoral disease. 4.Time from injury to surgery >2 weeks. 5.Concurrent active infection or severe medical conditions. 6.Severe neuropsychiatric disorders affecting follow-up compliance. 7.Postmenopausal women. 8.Inability to tolerate surgery or refusal of surgery. 9.Comorbid patellar dysplasia, rheumatoid arthritis, or other patellofemoral diseases.
10.Comorbid systemic or local infection at surgical site. 11.Comorbid severe lower limb or systemic injuries. 12.Pre-injury cognitive impairment, mental disorder, or independent walking disability.
13.Other conditions unsuitable for enrollment.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Suture Fixation (SF) Group
Patients receiving high-strength suture modified tension band fixation for patellar fracture.
|
Use of high-strength sutures for modified tension band fixation in patellar fracture surgery.
Other Names:
|
|
Screw-Cable Tension Band (SCTB) Group
Patients receiving traditional screw-cable tension band fixation for patellar fracture.
|
Use of screws and cables for traditional modified tension band fixation in patellar fracture surgery.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lysholm Knee Score at 12 Months Postoperatively
Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively
|
Lysholm knee scoring scale (0-100 points; 95-100 = excellent, 84-94 = good, 65-83 = fair, <65 = poor; higher scores indicate better knee function).
Assessed at baseline (pre-injury recalled), 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
|
12 months postoperatively
|
|
Knee Range of Motion at 12 Months Postoperatively
Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively
|
Active knee flexion and extension range of motion measured in degrees with a goniometer (higher values indicate better function).
Assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
|
12 months postoperatively
|
|
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score at 12 Months Postoperatively
Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively
|
Visual Analog Scale for pain (0-10 points; 0 = no pain, 10 = worst imaginable pain; higher scores indicate more severe pain).
Assessed preoperatively and at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively.
|
12 months postoperatively
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Fracture Healing Time
Time Frame: Assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively or until healing confirmed
|
Time in weeks from surgery until radiographic evidence of fracture line blurring or disappearance on X-ray/CT.
|
Assessed at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively or until healing confirmed
|
|
Radiographic Alignment Quality
Time Frame: Immediately postoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
Postoperative fracture reduction quality graded as good, satisfactory, or poor based on X-ray.
|
Immediately postoperatively and at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Complication Rate
Time Frame: From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
Incidence of any postoperative complications (e.g., infection, fixation failure, nonunion, knee stiffness, deep vein thrombosis).
|
From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Reoperation Rate
Time Frame: From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
Percentage of patients requiring any additional surgery related to the index fracture.
|
From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Implant Removal Rate
Time Frame: From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
Percentage of patients requiring removal of surgical implants.
|
From surgery to 12 months postoperatively
|
|
SF-36 (36-Item Short Form Health Survey) Score
Time Frame: 12 months postoperatively
|
36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire assessing health-related quality of life.
The SF-36 includes eight domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, mental health); scores for each domain range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better health status.
The Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) will also be calculated and reported.
Assessed at 12 months postoperatively.
|
12 months postoperatively
|
|
Surgical Time
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Duration of the surgical procedure recorded in minutes from skin incision to closure.
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Intraoperative Blood Loss
Time Frame: Day of surgery
|
Estimated volume of blood loss during surgery recorded in milliliters.
|
Day of surgery
|
|
Hospital Stay Duration
Time Frame: From day of surgery to discharge
|
Number of days from the date of surgery to the date of hospital discharge.
|
From day of surgery to discharge
|
|
Quadriceps Muscle Strength (Manual Muscle Testing)
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
Quadriceps strength graded 0-5 using Manual Muscle Testing (MMT; 0 = no contraction, 5 = normal strength), compared with the contralateral side.
|
Assessed at 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
|
Patellar Height (Insall-Salvati Index)
Time Frame: Assessed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
Ratio of patellar tendon length to patellar length measured on lateral knee radiographs (normal range 0.8-1.2).
|
Assessed at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Wei Xu, Dr, Fuzhou University Affiliated Provincial Hospital
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Adjal J, Haugaard A, Vesterby L, Ibrahim HM, Sert K, Thomsen MG, Tengberg PT, Ban I, Ohrt-Nissen S. Suture tension band fixation vs. metallic tension band wiring for patella fractures - A biomechanical study on 19 human cadaveric patellae. Injury. 2022 Aug;53(8):2749-2753. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2022.05.015. Epub 2022 May 26.
- Hughes SC, Stott PM, Hearnden AJ, Ripley LG. A new and effective tension-band braided polyester suture technique for transverse patellar fracture fixation. Injury. 2007 Feb;38(2):212-22. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.07.013. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
- Carpenter JE, Kasman RA, Patel N, Lee ML, Goldstein SA. Biomechanical evaluation of current patella fracture fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 1997 Jul;11(5):351-6. doi: 10.1097/00005131-199707000-00009.
- LeBrun CT, Langford JR, Sagi HC. Functional outcomes after operatively treated patella fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2012 Jul;26(7):422-6. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318228c1a1.
- Sayum Filho J, Lenza M, Tamaoki MJ, Matsunaga FT, Belloti JC. Interventions for treating fractures of the patella in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 24;2(2):CD009651. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009651.pub3.
- Huang L, Li X, Ye L, Li S. Closed Reduction and High-Strength Sutures for Transverse Patella Fractures: A Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Orthop. 2023 Feb 27;57(4):571-576. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00843-4. eCollection 2023 Apr.
- Giuseppe R, Michele R, Luca F, Michele G, Giuseppe G, Valentina M, Giustra F, Bosco F, Camarda L. Nonmetallic tension band fixation is a viable and low-complication surgical technique in patellar fractures: a five-year retrospective study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 May;34(4):2065-2071. doi: 10.1007/s00590-024-03887-w. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
- Xiang F, Xiao Y, Li D, Ma W, Chen Y, Yang Y. Tension band high-strength suture combined with absorbable cannulated screws for treating transverse patellar fractures: finite element analysis and clinical study. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Mar 7;12:1340482. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1340482. eCollection 2024.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- K2025-10-005
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Patella Fracture
-
Unity Health TorontoActive, not recruiting
-
Istituto Ortopedico RizzoliRecruitingOsteochondritis Dissecans | Osteochondral Defect | Osteochondral Fracture | Osteochondral Fracture of PatellaItaly
-
Diakoniekrankenhaus FriederikenstiftCompletedFracture of PatellaGermany
-
The University of Hong KongRecruiting
-
Sohag UniversityRecruiting
-
Rasmus ElsøeAarhus University Hospital; Viborg Regional Hospital; Randers Regional Hospital; Regional Hospital Hjoerring and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | Orthopedic Disorder | Patella FractureDenmark
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityCompletedInferior Patellar Fracture | Fracture Maps | Finite Element AnalysisChina
-
Northern Orthopaedic Division, DenmarkCompleted
-
The University of Hong KongRecruiting
Clinical Trials on High-Strength Suture Modified Tension Band Fixation
-
Rasmus ElsøeAarhus University Hospital; Viborg Regional Hospital; Randers Regional Hospital; Regional Hospital Hjoerring and other collaboratorsCompletedSurgery | Orthopedic Disorder | Patella FractureDenmark
-
Assaf-Harofeh Medical CenterCompleted
-
Region SkaneLund UniversityRecruiting
-
Andrew D DuckworthCompletedDisplaced Olecranon FracturesUnited Kingdom
-
Oslo University HospitalCompleted
-
University Hospital MuensterUniversität MünsterCompleted
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow UniversityCompletedInferior Patellar Fracture | Fracture Maps | Finite Element AnalysisChina
-
St. Erik Eye HospitalUmeå UniversityCompleted
-
Turku University HospitalHelsinki University Central Hospital; Oulu University Hospital; Kuopio University... and other collaboratorsRecruiting
-
Oslo University HospitalRecruiting