Transcultural Digital Solutions in Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation (COMPASS)

February 4, 2026 updated by: Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi Onlus

CrOss-cultural Model for Postdischarge Assistance and Sustainable Digital Solutions in Phase III Cardiac Rehabilitation: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Multicenter Prospective Controlled Randomized Trial, open-label, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome and ischemic heart failure) and an approved indication for cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Patients completing phase II CR will be randomized 1:1 to usual Phase-III care (standard care) versus standard care plus the Digitally-Enhanced Extended PrEvention & Rehabilitation (DEEPER) package (intervention). Primary outcome is 6-month change in composite Life's Crucial 9 (LC9) (LE8 + PHQ-9).

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Multicenter Prospective Controlled Randomized Trial, open-label, in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome and ischemic heart failure) and an approved indication for cardiac rehabilitation (CR). Patients completing phase II CR will be randomized 1:1 to usual Phase-III care (standard care) versus standard care plus the Digitally-Enhanced Extended PrEvention & Rehabilitation (DEEPER) package (intervention). Primary outcome is 6-month change in composite Life's Crucial 9 (LE9) (LE8 + PHQ-9). Intervention (DEEPER) will include informative modules (patient will choose among graphic medicine, video or interactive messaging) that will be delivered every two weeks via secure digital platform (or booklet if offline); monthly motivational messages; moderated peer-support forum with leaderboard; remote wearable step/sleep upload with personalized content assignment and feedback, linked to the hospital interactive digital platform (Rehab companion).

Patients will be encouraged to have their own device to be adopted as lifelong maintenance. Nevertheless, centres will provide a smartwatch (fitbit) to all the patients enrolled in the trial as incentive for study participation and to uniformly collect study outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

306

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Leuven, Belgium
        • KU Leuven, Kaatje Goetschalckx, KU Leuven
        • Contact:
          • Véronique Cornelissen
      • Castellanza, Italy
        • Carlo Cattaneo - LIUC University
        • Contact:
          • Emanuela Foglia
      • Lumezzane, Italy
        • Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpA - Società Benefit, IRCCS, Lumezzane
        • Contact:
          • Simonetta Scalvini
      • Lisbon, Portugal
        • Associação para Investigação e Desenvolvimento da Faculdade de Medicina - AIDFM, representing Instituto Medicina Preventiva e Saúde Public (IMPSP) & Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB)
        • Contact:
          • Ana Abreu
      • Bern, Switzerland
        • Centre for Rehabilitation & Sports Medicine, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern, Bern Switzerland
        • Contact:
          • Matthias Wilhelm

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18, men and women;
  • patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) (acute coronary syndrome or chronic coronary syndrome and ischemic heart failure);
  • patients who completed phase II CR and are therefore eligible for CR phase III (maintenance).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to sign the informed consent;
  • unable or unwilling to use digital devices due to mental/cognitive issues or without a support person helping them to access the respective technical devices;
  • pregnant, lactating or women planning pregnancy during the course of the trial.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: DEEPER
As "Standard Care" plus every 15 days in the first month and at least once a month chat with healthcare professional that will keep posted with the patient and the staff (nurse, physiotherapist, cardiologist) for all the issues raised by the patients. chat with answer within 72 hours. Graphical medicine to increase patients' awareness.
A transcultural scientific digital platform (Rehab companion, Inselspital, University Hospital of Bern) for content delivery, feedback and digital biomarker monitoring will be made available.
No Intervention: Standard of care
Discharge after phase II, LC9 evaluation, discharge indications, website indication for every country language support (from the European Society of Preventive Cardiology). FU contact by phone at 3 months, clinical visit at 6 months [6 month LE9 assessment (primary endpoint)] and contact by phone at 1 year for MACE evaluation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-month change in composite Life's Essential 9 (LE9)
Time Frame: 6-month change
LC9 is defined by the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8), complemented by the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), collectively referred to as "LC9 [blood pressure, non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), diet questionnaire, physical activity, smoking habits, sleep health, body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c, %), PHQ9 from questionnaire).
6-month change

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Individual LE8 sub-scores
Time Frame: 6-month change
Reported as differences in the absolute value among the two groups (median and (IQR)
6-month change
Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)
Time Frame: 6 months
defined as a composite of death of any cause, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, rehospitalization for any cause, stroke, considered in a hierarchical way and as single endpoint
6 months
Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)
Time Frame: 1 year
defined as a composite of death of any cause, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization, rehospitalization for any cause, stroke, considered in a hierarchical way and as single endpoint
1 year
GAD 7
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
anxiety score; Seven-item questionnaire that assesses the severity of anxiety symptoms over the past two weeks, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
PHQ 9
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
depression score; The PHQ-9 score ranges from 0 to 27. Scores between 5 and 9 indicate the presence of subthreshold depression.
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Physical fitness
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
distance achieved in 6-minute walking test
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
VO2 peak
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
cardiopulmonary test (CPET)
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
30 second sit-to -stand test
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
number of times the patient stands in 30 seconds
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Hand-grip strength
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
maximum voluntary muscle strength measured by dynamometer
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Steps per day
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
amount of steps during the day
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Waist circumference
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Waist circumference in cm
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
counter movement jump test.
Time Frame: Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Maximum power measured by dynamometer; difference in the absolute value among the two groups
Changes between baseline and 6-month follow-up
Compliance with study treatment
Time Frame: 6 months
Compliance with study treatment defined as number (percentage) of patients who will attend the sessions provided and will complete the study.
6 months
Economic impact of the CR pathways and financial sustainability: standard care versus stardard care plus the DEEPER package
Time Frame: 6 months

Direct costs of the two pathways, estimated using Activity Based Costing and financial sustainability measured with a budget impact analysis (BIA). Results reported as mean difference and standard deviation (SD) between groups.

Cost per patient and cost-effectiveness ratio will be calculated per group of treatment.

6 months
Assessment of social, ethical and equity dimensions.
Time Frame: 6 months
Perceptions reported by the patients, measured with a seven item Likert scale structured questionnaire based on the EUnetHTA Core Model dimensions, comparing standard care versus DEEPER package (mean and p-value)
6 months
Social costs
Time Frame: 6 months
Analysis of the indirect and out of pocket costs as average value in case of standard care and DEEPER package, to define the social costs related to the interventions.
6 months
Safety endpoint
Time Frame: 6 months
Musculo-skeletal injuries (requiring medical attention) and Arrhythmias (atrial fibrillation, supraventricular tachycardia, ventricular tachycardia) requiring medical attention and an emergency room or ambulatory visit.
6 months
Acceptance of the usual care and the DEEPER package pathway using the Service User Technology Acceptance Questionnaire (SUTAQ) average values
Time Frame: 6 months
Responses to SUTAQ-based questionnaire administered to patients involved in the study, analyzed through a seven items scale scoring. Results reported as mean, p-value and linear regression models for enhanced care, increased accessibility, privacy and discomfort, care personnel concerns, telerehabilitation as substitution and satisfaction.
6 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Nuccia Morici, MD, IRCCS Fondazione Don Gnocchi

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

April 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 31, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

COMPASS research outputs will be primarily disseminated through the Zenodo repository to guarantee persistent access. To enhance discoverability, we will implement a FAIR Data Point following the official FDP specification, initially through a self-hosted solution during the active project phase. As the ecosystem evolves, we plan to migrate this functionality to established platforms like FAIR sharing, contingent on their ability to fully support our metadata requirements for cardiac rehabilitation data.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the study completion

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Data anonymization process

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Myocardial Infarction

Clinical Trials on DEEPER

Subscribe