African American Cancer Clinical Trial Decisions: Testing Tailored Messages

March 31, 2020 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
The purpose of this study is to determine if the use of tailored health messages and/or involving physicians are effective in increasing African American (AA) patient activation in a clinical trial consultation. The proposal will use a composite score for patient activation derived from the Street Patient Activation Coding system. This will help to determine the effectiveness of our intervention on patient activation and patient centered clinical trial decision.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

A randomized clinical trial (using a 2x2 factorial design) to inform our knowledge of the efficacy of a tailored health message intervention, using different depths of tailoring and involving physicians, on AA cancer patients' active communication in CT consultations as measured by the Street Patient Activation measure. In this study 357 AA cancer patients will be randomized into one of four experimental groups Group 1 - messages tailored on Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data. Group 2 - messages tailored on EMR + physician involvement. Group 3 - messages tailored on EMR + survey. Group 4 - Messages tailored on EMR + survey + physician involvement. We will also measure patient: a) trust in their physician, b) trust in medical research, c) preferences that include information and decision involvement, d) communication self-efficacy, e) patient-family member communication congruence, f) consultation satisfaction and g) decision outcomes that include decisional conflict, decision satisfaction and decision regret.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23298
        • Virginia Commonwealth University/Massey Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 21 years of age or older
  • Have a cancer diagnosis
  • Self identify as African American
  • Therapeutic Phase I, II or III clinical trial at Massey Cancer Center (regardless of whether or not they join the therapeutic trial)
  • Be able to provide informed consent
  • We will also recruit one family member/caregiver (N = 357) of each participating patient
  • Consented patients will not be excluded from this study if their family member declines to participate by completing the Cancer Communication Assessment Tool for Families (CCAT-F).

Exclusions Criteria:

-None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: GROUP 1: (EMR) Tailoring Alone
Patients will be randomized to receive tailored messages based on demographic and disease information extracted from Massey Cancer Center (MCC) electronic medical records (EMR) that will include a) demographic information: age, income, education and health insurance status, b) disease variables: cancer type and severity and c) trial variables: phase of trial being offered and prior trial participation.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data alone will be entered into the Michigan Tailoring System (MTS system) and their brochures will be prepared.
Other Names:
  • EMR
  • "shallow" level of tailored messages
  • Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Tailoring
Active Comparator: GROUP 2:EMR Tailoring+Feedback
Patients will be randomized to receive tailored messages based on information extracted from the EMR as in Group 1. Physicians also receive a summary of tailored messages provided to patients.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data alone will be entered into the Michigan Tailoring System (MTS system) and their brochures will be prepared.
Other Names:
  • EMR
  • "shallow" level of tailored messages
  • Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Tailoring
Prior to the consultation, physicians of patients will receive a summary of patients' tailored message brochure from the Research Assistant (RA) and included in the patient's notes. At the conclusion of the consultation, the RA will ask the oncologist whether or not a clinical trial was discussed and whether or not they read the patients brochure.
Other Names:
  • Feedback
Active Comparator: GROUP 3:EMR+Survey Tailoring alone
Patients will be randomized to receive tailored messages based on EMR data as in Group 1. Patients will complete a survey that will be used to provide a deeper level of tailored messages
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data alone will be entered into the Michigan Tailoring System (MTS system) and their brochures will be prepared.
Other Names:
  • EMR
  • "shallow" level of tailored messages
  • Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Tailoring
Survey that will use standardized, psycho-metrically sound measures to gather information about patients, including their levels of trust in medical research and preferences for information and decision involvement. The survey augmented by their EMR data will be used to develop a level of tailored messages.
Other Names:
  • "deeper" level of tailored messages
  • Tailoring Survey
  • deep tailoring
  • Survey data tailoring
Active Comparator: GROUP 4:EMR+Survey Tailoring+Feedback
Patients will be randomized to receive tailored messages based on information extracted from their EMR as in Group I. Patients will complete a survey that will be used to provide a deeper level of tailored messages as in Group 3. Physicians also receive a summary of tailored messages provided to patients as in Group 2.
Electronic Medical Records (EMR) data alone will be entered into the Michigan Tailoring System (MTS system) and their brochures will be prepared.
Other Names:
  • EMR
  • "shallow" level of tailored messages
  • Electronic Medical Records (EMR) Tailoring
Prior to the consultation, physicians of patients will receive a summary of patients' tailored message brochure from the Research Assistant (RA) and included in the patient's notes. At the conclusion of the consultation, the RA will ask the oncologist whether or not a clinical trial was discussed and whether or not they read the patients brochure.
Other Names:
  • Feedback
Survey that will use standardized, psycho-metrically sound measures to gather information about patients, including their levels of trust in medical research and preferences for information and decision involvement. The survey augmented by their EMR data will be used to develop a level of tailored messages.
Other Names:
  • "deeper" level of tailored messages
  • Tailoring Survey
  • deep tailoring
  • Survey data tailoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Demonstrate the efficacy of the tailored health message intervention to increase patient activation.
Time Frame: 40 days
Randomized clinical trial (using a 2x2 factorial design) to inform our knowledge of the efficacy of a tailored health message intervention, using different depths of tailoring and involving physicians, on AA cancer patients' active communication in CT consultations. In this study AA cancer patients will be randomized into one of four experimental groups. Scientifically determine the effectiveness of our intervention by using a composite score for patient activation derived from the Street Patient Activation Coding system.
40 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Richard Brown, Ph.D., Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

March 6, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2015

First Posted (Estimate)

February 5, 2015

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2020

Last Verified

March 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MCC-14-10762
  • HM20002965 (Other Identifier: Virginia Commonwealth University)
  • NCI-2015-01819 (Registry Identifier: NCI CTRP)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lymphoma

Clinical Trials on EMR Tailoring

3
Subscribe