Exploration of Metabolome in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease and Pulmonary Hypertension With or Without Specific Pulmonary Hypertension Treatment (BREATH-TPT)

February 16, 2026 updated by: Hospices Civils de Lyon

Blood and uRine Metabolomics Exploration for Assessing Thoracic Health After Treatment of Group 3 Pulmonary Hypertension

Fibrosing interstitial lung diseases (FILDs) encompass a group of rare diseases characterized by progressive pulmonary fibrosis leading to respiratory failure. Current treatments primarily aim to slow disease progression but remain limited, making lung transplantation the ultimate recourse.

The development of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in the context of FILDs significantly worsens morbidity and mortality and drastically reduces patients' life expectancy. Conventional treatments for PH are generally ineffective in this setting. Nevertheless, some promising therapeutic agents are currently under investigation, particularly inhaled prostacyclin analogs such as treprostinil, which have demonstrated efficacy in recent clinical studies.

Our study aims to explore, in a minimally invasive manner, variations in metabolites in the serum and urine of patients with PH secondary to FILDs, before and during treatment. The main objective is to better understand the systemic effect of these treatments. Furthermore, the identification of metabolomic signatures will allow us to differentiate responders from non-responders, thus providing valuable prognostic and predictive criteria.

To date, some patients do not benefit from the available treatments, and better selection of responders could prevent iatrogenic effects in patients whose clinical condition is already fragile. In addition, characterizing the systemic mode of action of these treatments could pave the way for new clinical research focused on the profiles of responding patients.

Finally, a thorough understanding of the efficacy of the studied therapies is essential. Indeed, effective treatment of PH in the context of FILDs could not only slow disease progression but also reduce the need for lung transplantation, a major challenge in a context of organ shortage.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

80

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adult patients monitored at Hospices Civils de Lyon for Interstitial Lung Disease, with suspected group 3 PH, for whom the medical team is considering or discussing the indication for specific ILD-PH treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from progressive interstitial lung disease (ILD) and especially lung fibrosis
  • Suspicion of precapillar pulmonary hypertension (group 3 PH / ILD-PH)
  • Patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation for haemodynamic confirmation
  • Patient who has given informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients suffering from other forms of PH (i.e. PAH, CTEPH, heart failure, multifactorial

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Group "intervention"

Patients who suffer from ILD and ILD-PH from this group will be given specific treatments (especially inhaled TREPROSTINIL, up to 3 breath per use; 4 uses a day) for ILD-PH after usual independent collegial consultation Those patients will have before and after treatment blood and urine metabolomic profile.

They will have baseline and follow up blood and urine sampling. They will be offer possibility to perform up to 6 auto-sampling at home.

Blood (veinous) will be collected under standard care conditions, in a dry red blood tube without additional gel (4 mL) to obtain serum after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1500g, in the form of 500µL aliquots, labelled with the patient's code in the study.

This sampling will be performed at baseline in both group; and after follow up completion in Group 1 (4-6 month)

Urine collected from patient into a dry powder compact in the waiting room before or after the consultation. Preparation of two cryotubes containing at least 1 mL per sample, labelled with the patient's code in the study. In the absence of a calling point, strict aseptic conditions are not required, as the use of chemicals or antiseptic soaps can interfere with the dosages.

This sampling will be performed in Group 1 and 2 at baseline; and in Group 1 at 2-month and after completion of follow-up time (4-6 month).

Group " control "

Patients who suffer from ILD and ILD-PH from this group will not be given specific ILD-PH treatment based on insufficient haemodynamic data or clinical contraindications after independent collegial consultation.

They will have only baseline blood and urine sampling.

Blood (veinous) will be collected under standard care conditions, in a dry red blood tube without additional gel (4 mL) to obtain serum after centrifugation for 10 minutes at 1500g, in the form of 500µL aliquots, labelled with the patient's code in the study.

This sampling will be performed at baseline in both group; and after follow up completion in Group 1 (4-6 month)

Urine collected from patient into a dry powder compact in the waiting room before or after the consultation. Preparation of two cryotubes containing at least 1 mL per sample, labelled with the patient's code in the study. In the absence of a calling point, strict aseptic conditions are not required, as the use of chemicals or antiseptic soaps can interfere with the dosages.

This sampling will be performed in Group 1 and 2 at baseline; and in Group 1 at 2-month and after completion of follow-up time (4-6 month).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of urinary metabolite concentrations before and after initiation of treatment measured centrally by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-NMR).
Time Frame: Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.

The 1H-NMR analysis of each patient's urine will enable us to obtain a table showing the absolute concentration of metabolites per individual.

The effects of the drug response will be interpreted following pairwise-comparisons of metabolite concentrations per individual within Group 1, and expressed as fold change to perform a pathway assessment, notably using Metabo Analyst tool

Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.
Comparison of blood metabolite concentrations before and after initiation of treatment measured centrally by proton nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (¹H-NMR).
Time Frame: Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.

The 1H-NMR analysis of each patient's blood will enable us to obtain a table showing the absolute concentration of metabolites per individual.

The effects of the drug response will be interpreted following pairwise-comparisons of metabolite concentrations per individual within Group 1, and expressed as fold change to perform a pathway assessment, notably using Metabo Analyst tool.

It will also allow us to explore kidney filtration effect on metabolic profile

Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.
Comparative prognosis analysis within sub-groups
Time Frame: Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.
Based on clinical response, several subgroups will be defined (responders, non-responders, paradoxical worsening) in order to define prognostic signatures using intergroup statistical comparisons of baseline metabolic concentrations.
Outcome is measured when all patients will have their 4-6 months follow-up completed.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 16, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 16, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 16, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

November 28, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 16, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Interstitial Lung Disease

Clinical Trials on Blood sampling for metabolomic profiling

Subscribe