Accuracy Between Transthoracal Needle Aspiration (TTNA) Techniques in Suspected Lung Cancer Patients

November 27, 2025 updated by: Siswanto Siswanto, Gadjah Mada University

Accuracy Between Jabbing-then-suction, Suction-with-jabbing, and Suction-only Transthoracal Needle Aspiration (TTNA) Techniques in Suspected Lung Cancer Patients

  • The objective of this research is to determine the accuracy of different types of lung transthoracal needle aspiration (TTNA) i.e. jabbing-then-suction, suction-with-jabbing, and suction-only TTNA in patients with suspected lung cancer.
  • Researchers will compare these techniques to determine whether there are any quality differences in the obtained tumor samples

Study Overview

Detailed Description

During hospitalization for diagnostic testing, suspected lung cancer patients will undergo a transthoracic biopsy using three TTNA techniques, and core needle biopsy as the gold standard. The biopsy is performed in the operating room under local anesthesia and under the supervision of an anesthesiologist. The biopsy techniques used are routine procedures and therefore not as a new method. After the biopsy is completed, the patient is observed for at least 24 hours to observe potential complications.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

54

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Special Region of Yogyakarta
      • Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia, 55291
        • Recruiting
        • Universitas Gadjah Mada Academic Hospital (RSA UGM)
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • dr. Siswanto, Sp.P(K)Onk

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with suspected lung cancer who will undergo diagnostic testing using ultrasound-guided TTNA of the lung with cell block and core biopsy.
  • Patients aged 18-75 years.
  • The tumor is located peripherally, attached to the chest wall.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refuses lung biopsy
  • Non-cooperative patient
  • Patient with respiratory failure, on positive pressure ventilation
  • Severe pulmonary emphysema
  • Contralateral pneumonectomy
  • Advanced pulmonary fibrosis
  • Platelet count <100,000/mm3 and international normalized ratio (INR) >1.4

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Jabbing-then-Suction, Suction-with-Jabbing, and Suction-only Transthoracal Needle Aspiration (TTNA)
Each of patient will undergo three types of different transthoracal needle aspiration (TTNA)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of samples from different types of transthoracal needle aspiration (TTNA) technique
Time Frame: Immediate after biopsy procedure
To determine the quality of samples between the jabbing-then-suction technique, the suction-with-jabbing technique, and the suction-only technique of transthoracic needle aspiration procedures in patients with unsuspected lung cancer. The sample quality assessed includes the adequacy of the number of tumor cells for molecular examination and the concordance between cytology sample of each type of TTNA technique.
Immediate after biopsy procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) collected during the trial reported in the article will be shared, after deidentification.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

IPD and supporting information will be available immediately following publication, without end date.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Requestors who provide a methodologically sound proposal can access the our IPD data. Proposals should be directed to roihan.iqbal@gmail.com

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Lung Cancer (Diagnosis)

Subscribe