Clinical Evaluation of Bulk-fill Restorative Materials

April 18, 2024 updated by: Muhammet Karadaş, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Clinical Evaluation of High-viscosity Glass-hybrid Systems Compared With a Bulk Fill Composite Resin in Different Cavity Type

High-viscosity glass ionomer cements have been developed to improve the weak mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements, increase wear resistance and improve their limited indications. There are limited clinical studies on the use of high-viscosity glass ionomer cements in areas with large cavities bearing stress. The aim of this study is to compare the clinical performance of two different high-viscosity glass ionomer cements with a bulk-fill resin composite in different cavities.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

This study was a double-blind (evaluator and patient) randomized controlled clinical study with three study groups with an equal allocation. Three different restorative materials were compared in Class I, II, and V restorations.

The treated patients were called back for controls after one week, six months, and eighteen months. Restorations were evaluated clinically according to modified FDI criteria. In terms of marginal discoloration, fracture and retention, marginal adaptation, post-operative sensitivity, secondary caries, color match and difference criteria were examined.

Clinical evaluation was performed by one qualified clinicians using a mirror and probe under reflector light. Bite-wing radiographs were taken from the patients who were called for controls at 6-moth and 18-month to evaluate the formation of secondary caries.

Differences between adhesives at each time period were evaluated using Fisher's Exact test. The effect of time on restorations was evaluated using Wilcoxon Signed rank test (p < 0.05).

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Merkez
      • Rize, Merkez, Turkey, 53100
        • Muhammet Karadaş

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Teeth with primary caries that extends into the middle or outer one-third of the dentin (D1 or D2) in radiographs were included in the study. Visually, teeth with visible signs of enamel breakdown or moderate demineralization of dentin (ICDAS 4) in occlusal and smooth surfaces were included in the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Voluntarily agreed to participate in the study after being informed about the study.
  • Volunteer must not be under 18 years of age
  • No systemic disease
  • Having healthy oral hygiene
  • As a result of clinical and radiographic examination, there is a carious lesion at D1 and D2 levels according to the caries classification method.
  • The tooth to be restored is vital

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal to participate in the study after being informed about the study
  • The patient has a history of teeth grinding
  • Volunteer must be under 18 years of age
  • The volunteer is undergoing or will begin orthodontic treatment
  • The volunteer has a serious systemic disease
  • The tooth to be restored has endodontic and periodontal problems
  • Volunteer's pregnancy status
  • Extraction of one of the teeth opposite or in contact with the tooth to be restored

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Evaluation of different restorative materials
Time Frame: Baseline
Restored teeth were evaluated according to FDI criteria.
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muhammet 53 Karadaş, PhD, Recep Tayyip Erdogan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 17, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 31, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RTEUDHFMKARADAS002

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Caries; Dentin

Clinical Trials on World Dental Federation criteria (FDI)

Subscribe