Virtual Reality Reduces Pre-Procedural Anxiety in TEER Patients, But Timing Seems Crucial

November 24, 2025 updated by: Abby Geerlings

Virtual Reality Reduces Pre-Procedural Anxiety in TEER Pa-tients, But Timing Seems Crucial

This study aims to evaluate the effect of adding virtual reality (VR) education to standard pre-procedural information on anxiety levels in patients scheduled for MitraClip or TricuspidClip procedures. Participants will receive either standard pre-procedural information or standard information supplemented with a VR experience that explains the procedure and hospital environment. The main outcomes will include changes in patient-reported anxiety before and after the procedure. The goal of this study is to determine whether the use of VR can improve patient understanding, reduce procedural anxiety, and enhance overall well-being

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

75

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105 AZ
        • Amsterdam UMC

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults scheduled for elective mitral (M-TEER) or tricuspid (T-TEER) transcatheter edge-to-edge repair procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Insufficient proficiency in Dutch.
  • Severe visual or auditory impairment that would prevent full engagement with the VR content.
  • Any mental or physical condition that, in the judgment of the clinical team, significantly interferes with participation (e.g., advanced cognitive decline, acute psychological distress, or inability to tolerate wearing a VR headset).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group - Standard Education
Participants in this group will receive standard pre-procedural education according to the hospital's routine practice. This includes verbal and written information provided by the healthcare team about the MitraClip or TricuspidClip procedure, preparation, and aftercare.
Active Comparator: VR Group - Standard Education plus Virtual Reality (VR)
Participants in this group will receive the same standard pre-procedural education as the control group, supplemented with an immersive virtual reality (VR) experience. The VR session provides a visual and interactive explanation of the procedure and hospital environment to enhance understanding, reduce anxiety, and improve the overall patient experience.
Participants in this group will receive the same standard pre-procedural education as the control group, supplemented with an immersive virtual reality (VR) experience. The VR session provides a visual and interactive explanation of the procedure and hospital environment to enhance understanding, reduce anxiety, and improve the overall patient experience.
Other Names:
  • Virtual reality

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pre-procedural anxiety
Time Frame: 1 week prior to procedure
Change in state anxiety (S-STAI score) immediately after patient education (VR intervention vs. standard verbal education) and onw week prior to the procedure.
1 week prior to procedure

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request after publication of the main results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Anxiety

Clinical Trials on Standard Education plus Virtual Reality (VR)

Subscribe