SUCCESS Score Validation in Fuchs Dystrophy (SUCCESS)

November 24, 2025 updated by: Francisco Arnalich-Montiel, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria

Validation and Extension of the SUCCESS Score for Fuchs Dystrophy After Cataract Surgery

This prospective multicenter diagnostic study aims to externally validate and extend the SUCCESS Score for predicting the need for endothelial keratoplasty after cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). The model's performance and clinical utility are assessed using discrimination, calibration, and reclassification metrics.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) is a progressive corneal disorder characterized by endothelial cell loss, corneal edema, and visual impairment. In patients with FECD and cataract, an important clinical challenge is to predict whether cataract surgery alone will suffice or whether endothelial keratoplasty (EK) will be required postoperatively. Accurate preoperative risk stratification is essential for surgical planning and patient counseling.

The SUCCESS Score, derived from Scheimpflug tomography, was proposed as an objective index to estimate the risk of postoperative corneal decompensation in FECD. However, its external multicenter validation and the potential contribution of corneal densitometry have not yet been fully established.

This ongoing prospective, observational, multicenter study aims to externally validate and extend the SUCCESS Score for predicting the need for EK after cataract surgery in patients with FECD. The study is being conducted across five tertiary referral centers in Spain. Eligible participants are adults with FECD grade ≥2 on the modified Krachmer scale and a visually significant cataract requiring phacoemulsification. Patients with epithelial edema, prior ocular surgery, corneal infection, or trauma are excluded.

Preoperative evaluation includes Scheimpflug tomography and corneal densitometry analysis. The primary outcome is the requirement for endothelial keratoplasty after cataract surgery, determined by postoperative visual function and corneal evaluation. Model performance will be assessed through discrimination (Harrell's C statistic), calibration, reclassification (IDI, NRI), and decision curve analysis to estimate clinical utility.

The primary analysis is scheduled for completion in October 2024. Extended follow-up will continue until June 25, 2026, to assess long-term predictive performance and generalizability of the extended SUCCESS model.

An interactive web-based calculator implementing both the original and extended SUCCESS models will be provided as a supplementary tool to facilitate clinical use and standardized patient counseling across participating centers.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Madrid
      • Madrid, Madrid, Spain, 28034
        • Recruiting
        • Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Universidad de Alcalá, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS)
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

dults with clinically diagnosed Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) and visually significant cataract who are scheduled to undergo phacoemulsification surgery at participating tertiary referral centers in Spain. Eligible participants present FECD grade ≥2 on the modified Krachmer scale and have available preoperative Scheimpflug tomography and corneal densitometry measurements. The study population represents a real-world clinical cohort of patients routinely evaluated in corneal and cataract units, allowing assessment of the predictive performance and clinical utility of the SUCCESS Score under standard care conditions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged ≥40 years.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) grade ≥2 on the modified Krachmer scale.
  • Presence of visually significant cataract requiring phacoemulsification surgery.
  • Ability to provide informed consent and comply with study procedures.
  • Availability of preoperative Scheimpflug tomography and corneal densitometry measurements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Epithelial or stromal edema precluding reliable corneal imaging.
  • Previous ocular surgery (including corneal or intraocular procedures).
  • Corneal trauma, infection, or inflammation affecting endothelial integrity.
  • Coexisting ocular pathologies that could confound postoperative assessment (e.g., advanced glaucoma, macular degeneration).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
FECD Cohort
Patients with clinically diagnosed Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD) undergoing phacoemulsification cataract surgery at participating tertiary centers. All participants receive standard cataract surgery, and their preoperative data are used to calculate the SUCCESS Score with and without corneal densitometry parameters. Postoperative outcomes are monitored to determine the need for endothelial keratoplasty (EK).
Standard phacoemulsification cataract surgery performed in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). All procedures are carried out according to institutional protocols at participating tertiary centers. Preoperative Scheimpflug tomography and corneal densitometry measurements are collected to calculate the SUCCESS Score and evaluate the risk of postoperative endothelial decompensation. Postoperative outcomes are monitored to determine whether endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is required during follow-up.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Need for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) after cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy
Time Frame: Up to 36 months after cataract surgery
The primary outcome is the need for endothelial keratoplasty (EK) following phacoemulsification cataract surgery in patients with Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). The endpoint is determined based on postoperative best-corrected visual acuity, corneal clarity, and presence of clinical signs of corneal decompensation. Each eye is evaluated using standardized follow-up visits and imaging criteria across participating centers. The decision to perform EK is made according to established clinical indications by the attending ophthalmologist, ensuring consistency across study sites.
Up to 36 months after cataract surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Model discrimination (Harrell's C statistic) of the SUCCESS Score
Time Frame: At primary analysis (October 2024)
Model discrimination will be assessed using Harrell's C statistic (concordance index) to quantify how accurately the SUCCESS Score predicts the need for endothelial keratoplasty after cataract surgery in patients with FECD.
At primary analysis (October 2024)
Calibration and predictive accuracy of the SUCCESS Score
Time Frame: At primary analysis (June 2026)
Calibration plots and Brier score will be used to evaluate the agreement between predicted and observed probabilities of endothelial keratoplasty. Goodness-of-fit will be assessed across deciles of predicted risk.
At primary analysis (June 2026)
Reclassification and clinical utility of the extended SUCCESS model
Time Frame: At primary analysis (June 2026)
The incremental value of adding corneal densitometry to the SUCCESS Score will be assessed using Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI), Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI), and Decision Curve Analysis (DCA) to determine potential clinical benefit.
At primary analysis (June 2026)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 4, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 24, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Deidentified individual participant data (IPD) that underlie the results reported in this article will be made available to qualified researchers upon reasonable request. Access will be granted after publication of the primary results and upon approval of a methodologically sound proposal. Data will be shared through a secure institutional platform of the Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS).

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Beginning 12 months after publication and ending 36 months after publication.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Qualified researchers affiliated with academic or non-profit institutions may request access to the deidentified individual participant data (IPD), study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and analytic code. Requests must include a methodologically sound proposal describing the intended analyses and objectives.

Data and supporting materials will be shared through a secure institutional data repository managed by the Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS). Access will be granted upon approval by the study's data governance committee and completion of a data use agreement ensuring appropriate data handling and confidentiality.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fuchs Endothelial Corneal Dystrophy

Clinical Trials on Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery

Subscribe