Sublingual Misoprostol Versus No Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopic Resection of Symptomatic Uterine Niches

December 8, 2025 updated by: Ahmed Abdel Latif Ahmed Alnezamy, Benha University

Sublingual Misoprostol Versus No Cervical Priming Before Hysteroscopic Resection of Symptomatic Uterine Niches: Results From a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

The purpose of the study is to evaluated whether preoperative sublingual misoprostol can enhance the effectiveness and safety of niche resection in patients with symptomatic uterine niche.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

After eligibility and consenting, Participants with symptomatic uterine niche were randomized (1:1) to sublingual misoprostol or placebo. Baseline demographic and clinical variables (age, BMI, number of prior cesarean section, number of days of postmenstrual spotting, pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dysuria) were collected. Symptom severity was assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS, 1-10). Baseline niche characteristics (residual myometrial thickness, depth, length, and width) were measured by saline infusion sonohysterography. The misoprostol group received 200 µg sublingual misoprostol tablet two hours before surgery; controls received identical placebo tablets. Hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche was performed around cycle day 10 under spinal or general anesthesia using a 9-mm resectoscope with monopolar energy and 3.5% sorbitol for uterine distension. Misoprostol-related adverse events (cramping, fever, GI upset) were recorded preoperatively by a trained nurse. The Sanders and Murji technique was adapted as follow: (1) anatomical orientation, (2) cephalic rim resection, (3) caudal rim resection, and (4) rollerball ablation of the niche base . Intraoperative data (duration, need for dilators, intra- and postoperative complications). At 3 months postoperatively, participants were reassessed for reduction in number of days of postmenstrual spotting, changes in pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and dysuria (VAS scores), participants satisfaction (satisfied/very satisfied vs. dissatisfied/neutral), , and sonohysterographic niche measurements (RMT, depth, length, width).

The participants, hysteroscopist, outcome assessors, and the investigator were blinded for the assignment of the participants to either groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Qalyubia Governorate
      • Banhā, Qalyubia Governorate, Egypt, 13512
        • Benha Univesity Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ≥1 previous cesarean section
  • Post cesarean section uterine niche confirmed by saline infusion sonohysterography (niche depth ≥2 mm)
  • Residual myometrial thickness ≥2.5 mm as confirmed by saline infusion sonohysterography
  • Regular cycles
  • Abnormal uterine bleeding for ≥3 consecutive cycles
  • Post menstrual spotting or brownish discharge ≥2 days
  • Total monthly bleeding duration >7 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Irregular cycles
  • Amenorrhea
  • Abnormal cervical cytology
  • Acute or chronic cervicitis
  • Pelvic inflammatory disease
  • Endometrial polyps
  • Uterine fibroids
  • Contraindications to spinal or general anesthesia
  • Refusal to participate

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Misoprostol group
Misoprostol group received 200 µg sublingual misoprostol tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.
Misoprostol group received 200 µg sublingual misoprostol tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche. A trained nurse, independent of assessment, prepared and administered the medication to the participants.
Other Names:
  • Misotac®, Sigma Pharmaceutical Industries, Egypt
Procedures were performed around cycle day 10 under spinal or general anesthesia using a 9-mm resectoscope (Karl Storz, Germany) with monopolar energy and 3.5% sorbitol for uterine distension. The Sanders and Murji technique was adapted as follow: (1) anatomical orientation, (2) cephalic rim resection, (3) caudal rim resection, and (4) rollerball ablation of the niche base.
All participants were evaluated by a single blinded sonographer experienced in niche assessment. First, transvaginal ultrasound was performed to exclude pregnancy or pelvic pathology, followed by saline-infusion sonohysterography (2D, sagittal and coronal views). A niche was defined as ≥ 2 mm myometrial indentation at the scar site. Niche depth, length, width, and residual myometrial thickness were recorded.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
Placebo group received sublingual identical placebo tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.
Procedures were performed around cycle day 10 under spinal or general anesthesia using a 9-mm resectoscope (Karl Storz, Germany) with monopolar energy and 3.5% sorbitol for uterine distension. The Sanders and Murji technique was adapted as follow: (1) anatomical orientation, (2) cephalic rim resection, (3) caudal rim resection, and (4) rollerball ablation of the niche base.
All participants were evaluated by a single blinded sonographer experienced in niche assessment. First, transvaginal ultrasound was performed to exclude pregnancy or pelvic pathology, followed by saline-infusion sonohysterography (2D, sagittal and coronal views). A niche was defined as ≥ 2 mm myometrial indentation at the scar site. Niche depth, length, width, and residual myometrial thickness were recorded.
Placebo group received sublingual identical tablet two hours before hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche. A trained nurse, independent of assessment, prepared and administered the tab to the participants.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction in number of days of postmenstrual spotting.
Time Frame: At 3 months postoperative.
The number of days of postmenstrual spotting was recorded at baseline and 3 months post hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.
At 3 months postoperative.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total bleeding days per cycle
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Total bleeding days per cycle was recorded at baseline and 3 months post hysteroscopic resection of uterine niche.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Pelvic pain score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Dysmenorrhea score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Dyspareunia score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Dysuria score
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Pain was assessed using a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Participants mark a point on the line that represents their pain,giving that 0 means no pain and 10 means worst pain imaginable. The clinician measures the distance (in centimeters or millimeters) from 0 to the patient's mark and that number is the VAS pain score.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
Satisfaction with the outcome
Time Frame: At 3 months postoperative.
Participant satisfaction with the outcome was assessed using a binary scale (Yes when satisfied/very satisfied , No when dissatisfied/neutral).
At 3 months postoperative.
Uterine niche measurements
Time Frame: At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.
First, transvaginal ultrasound was performed to exclude pregnancy or pelvic pathology, followed by saline-infusion sonohysterography (2D, sagittal and coronal views). A niche was defined as ≥ 2 mm myometrial indentation at the scar site. Niche depth, length, width, and residual myometrial thickness were recorded.
At baseline and at 3 months postoperative.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: AHMED ALNEZAMY, MD, Lecturer of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Benha University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 11, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

October 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 27, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 8, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cesarean Section Complications

Clinical Trials on Misoprostol 200mcg Tab

Subscribe