- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07271108
Carrying Heavy Shopping Bags and Muscle Function
The Effect of Carrying Heavy Shopping Bags on Muscle Function and Mass: a Randomized Controlled Trial.
What Is This Study About? To find out whether carrying heavy shopping bags twice a week can help adults not currently meeting physical activity strength guidelines improve muscle mass, strength, power, and endurance.
What Can Be learnt?
- Can carrying shopping bags help improve muscle mass, strength, power, and endurance?
- Should carrying shopping bags be included within physical activity recommendations?
Two groups will be compared:
- One group will carry shopping bags twice a week within a controlled lab environment
- The other group won't change anything in their routine.
What Will Participants Do?
- Self-select a weight for shopping bags that is heavy but can be carried for 15 minutes to use for all sessions
- Walk with shopping bags for 15 minutes at a normal walking speed for carrying shopping home from the supermarket.
- After each minute, the time stops and participants place bags on the floor. The time restarts for the next minute when the participant chooses to pick up the bags again.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Glasgow City
-
Glasgow, Glasgow City, United Kingdom, G12 8QQ
- university of glasgow, James Black Building Lab
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Performing less than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
- Pass the physical activity readiness questionnaire
- Available during data collection period
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current or prior history of heart, lung, kidney, endocrine or liver disease or cancer.
- Performing more than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
- Answered yes to any of the questions in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
- Available during data collection period
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
No Intervention: Control - Usual routine
|
|
|
Experimental: Shopping bag carrying
Four-week shopping bag carry intervention (15 mins, 2x per week).
Performed under supervision in laboratory.
|
Four-week shopping bag carry intervention (15 mins, 2x per week).
Performed under supervision in laboratory.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Back strength
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Takei Back Strength Dynamometer (T.K.K. 5002 BACK-A Type-3) used to measure back strength to the nearest 1 kg.
Measurements taken with the legs, back and arms straight and the torso flexed to 30 degrees at the hip with the handle held in a natural grip.
Participants instructed to gradually pull as hard as they could on the handle in order to raise the upper part of their body without bending their knees.
Three trials performed with the maximum value used in the analysis.
|
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Jump Height
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Assessed using a countermovement jump with hands on hips. Participants instructed to crouch into a squat position and then jump as high as possible with legs fully extended and landing on the same spot with knees extended and feet together. After a familiarisation attempt, participants to perform three countermovement jumps and the maximum peak power used in the analysis. Jump height and flight time calculated using Microgate Optojump Next software version 1.10.5.0 connected to photoelectric bars RX10 and TX10 (Microgate Optojump Next, Bolzano, Italy) placed parallel to each other. Jump height derived from the equation: H = g×t2/8 (H = the jump height (m), t = jump flight time (seconds) and g = acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s-2)) |
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Peak Power
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Assessed using a countermovement jump with hands on hips. Participants instructed to crouch into a squat position and then jump as high as possible with legs fully extended and landing on the same spot with knees extended and feet together. After a familiarisation attempt, participants to perform three countermovement jumps and the maximum peak power used in the analysis. Jump height and flight time calculated using Microgate Optojump Next software version 1.10.5.0 connected to photoelectric bars RX10 and TX10 (Microgate Optojump Next, Bolzano, Italy) placed parallel to each other. Peak Power calculated using the Sayers equation: Peak Power (Watts) = 60.7 × jump height (cm) + 45.3 × body mass (kg) - 2055 |
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Muscle Endurance
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Endurance assessed by a 60 second sit to stand test using a 46.5cm high, straight-backed chair with a hard seat and no arm rests.
From a seated position with hands on shoulders and arms crossed across the chest, participants instructed to stand up from the chair until their legs were completely straight, then sit back down again (one complete sit to stand) as many times as possible in 60 seconds.
The number of complete sit to stands used in the analysis.
|
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer in handle position II used to measure grip strength to the nearest 1 kg.
Measurements taken with the participant seated with feet flat on the floor, elbow flexed 90 degrees by their side and with the wrist just over the end of the arm of the chair in a neutral position (thumbs-up position).
Participants instructed to squeeze as hard as possible until the needle stopped rising with the verbal encouragement of "squeeze, squeeze, squeeze and relax".
Three trials performed on each side, alternately, with the maximum value used in the analysis in accordance with the Southampton protocol
|
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
|
Body composition
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Assessed using a Body Composition Analyzer Type BC-418 MA (Tanita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to determine whole body bioimpedance between the hands and feet by applying a constant current of 90 microamps at 50kHz through the body.
Measurements taken in the standing position with bare feet placed on the footplate electrodes and the hand grip electrodes held by the side of the body.
Whole body impedance used to derive skeletal muscle mass.
|
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Distance shopping carried
Time Frame: 2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
|
The number of complete corridor lengths walked with the shopping bags in 15 minutes was recorded for those in the intervention group.
|
2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
|
|
Perceived exertion
Time Frame: 2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
|
Perceived exertion was measured using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale (RPE) [44] from 6-20, with 20 meaning the harderst exertion and 6 the least exertion at the end of each 15-minute carry for those in the intervention group.
|
2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimated)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 200220195
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Resistance Exercise
-
Chaise MurphySouth Dakota State UniversityCompletedResistance ExerciseUnited States
-
University of GaziantepCompleted
-
Lindenwood UniversityCompletedResistance ExerciseUnited States
-
University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignTexas Christian UniversityCompleted
-
Egas Moniz - Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRLCompletedAgeing | Aerobic Exercise | Resistance Exercise | Combined ExercisePortugal
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterGlaxoSmithKlineCompletedExercise | Resistance TrainingNetherlands
-
Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical UniversityRecruitingAerobic and Resistance ExerciseChina
-
Federal University of Rio Grande do SulCompleted
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingResistance Training | Plyometric Exercise | BasketballPakistan
-
Dr. Manuel González-SánchezCompletedExercise | Resistance Training | Functional PerformanceSpain
Clinical Trials on Experimental: Shopping bag carrying
-
Bahar CiftciCompletedEffect of a Urinary Catheter Carrying Bag on Satisfaction, Body Image, Self-Esteem, and Shame (UCCB)Patient Satisfaction | Body Image Disturbance | Long-Term Urinary Catheterization | Psychosocial Impact of Catheter Use | Low Self-EsteemTurkey