Carrying Heavy Shopping Bags and Muscle Function

December 5, 2025 updated by: Stuart Gray, University of Glasgow

The Effect of Carrying Heavy Shopping Bags on Muscle Function and Mass: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

What Is This Study About? To find out whether carrying heavy shopping bags twice a week can help adults not currently meeting physical activity strength guidelines improve muscle mass, strength, power, and endurance.

What Can Be learnt?

  • Can carrying shopping bags help improve muscle mass, strength, power, and endurance?
  • Should carrying shopping bags be included within physical activity recommendations?

Two groups will be compared:

  • One group will carry shopping bags twice a week within a controlled lab environment
  • The other group won't change anything in their routine.

What Will Participants Do?

  • Self-select a weight for shopping bags that is heavy but can be carried for 15 minutes to use for all sessions
  • Walk with shopping bags for 15 minutes at a normal walking speed for carrying shopping home from the supermarket.
  • After each minute, the time stops and participants place bags on the floor. The time restarts for the next minute when the participant chooses to pick up the bags again.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Glasgow City
      • Glasgow, Glasgow City, United Kingdom, G12 8QQ
        • university of glasgow, James Black Building Lab

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Performing less than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
  • Pass the physical activity readiness questionnaire
  • Available during data collection period

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or prior history of heart, lung, kidney, endocrine or liver disease or cancer.
  • Performing more than 2 days per week of muscle strengthening exercise
  • Answered yes to any of the questions in the Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  • Available during data collection period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control - Usual routine
Experimental: Shopping bag carrying
Four-week shopping bag carry intervention (15 mins, 2x per week). Performed under supervision in laboratory.
Four-week shopping bag carry intervention (15 mins, 2x per week). Performed under supervision in laboratory.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Back strength
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Takei Back Strength Dynamometer (T.K.K. 5002 BACK-A Type-3) used to measure back strength to the nearest 1 kg. Measurements taken with the legs, back and arms straight and the torso flexed to 30 degrees at the hip with the handle held in a natural grip. Participants instructed to gradually pull as hard as they could on the handle in order to raise the upper part of their body without bending their knees. Three trials performed with the maximum value used in the analysis.
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Jump Height
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended

Assessed using a countermovement jump with hands on hips. Participants instructed to crouch into a squat position and then jump as high as possible with legs fully extended and landing on the same spot with knees extended and feet together. After a familiarisation attempt, participants to perform three countermovement jumps and the maximum peak power used in the analysis. Jump height and flight time calculated using Microgate Optojump Next software version 1.10.5.0 connected to photoelectric bars RX10 and TX10 (Microgate Optojump Next, Bolzano, Italy) placed parallel to each other.

Jump height derived from the equation: H = g×t2/8 (H = the jump height (m), t = jump flight time (seconds) and g = acceleration due to gravity (9.81 m/s-2))

Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Peak Power
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended

Assessed using a countermovement jump with hands on hips. Participants instructed to crouch into a squat position and then jump as high as possible with legs fully extended and landing on the same spot with knees extended and feet together. After a familiarisation attempt, participants to perform three countermovement jumps and the maximum peak power used in the analysis. Jump height and flight time calculated using Microgate Optojump Next software version 1.10.5.0 connected to photoelectric bars RX10 and TX10 (Microgate Optojump Next, Bolzano, Italy) placed parallel to each other.

Peak Power calculated using the Sayers equation: Peak Power (Watts) = 60.7 × jump height (cm) + 45.3 × body mass (kg) - 2055

Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Muscle Endurance
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Endurance assessed by a 60 second sit to stand test using a 46.5cm high, straight-backed chair with a hard seat and no arm rests. From a seated position with hands on shoulders and arms crossed across the chest, participants instructed to stand up from the chair until their legs were completely straight, then sit back down again (one complete sit to stand) as many times as possible in 60 seconds. The number of complete sit to stands used in the analysis.
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Grip strength
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Jamar hydraulic hand dynamometer in handle position II used to measure grip strength to the nearest 1 kg. Measurements taken with the participant seated with feet flat on the floor, elbow flexed 90 degrees by their side and with the wrist just over the end of the arm of the chair in a neutral position (thumbs-up position). Participants instructed to squeeze as hard as possible until the needle stopped rising with the verbal encouragement of "squeeze, squeeze, squeeze and relax". Three trials performed on each side, alternately, with the maximum value used in the analysis in accordance with the Southampton protocol
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Body composition
Time Frame: Baseline and one week after the intervention ended
Assessed using a Body Composition Analyzer Type BC-418 MA (Tanita Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) to determine whole body bioimpedance between the hands and feet by applying a constant current of 90 microamps at 50kHz through the body. Measurements taken in the standing position with bare feet placed on the footplate electrodes and the hand grip electrodes held by the side of the body. Whole body impedance used to derive skeletal muscle mass.
Baseline and one week after the intervention ended

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Distance shopping carried
Time Frame: 2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
The number of complete corridor lengths walked with the shopping bags in 15 minutes was recorded for those in the intervention group.
2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
Perceived exertion
Time Frame: 2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention
Perceived exertion was measured using the Borg Rating of Perceived Exertion scale (RPE) [44] from 6-20, with 20 meaning the harderst exertion and 6 the least exertion at the end of each 15-minute carry for those in the intervention group.
2 x per week at every visit throughout the 4 week intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 5, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 200220195

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Anonymised participant data will be made available by the author upon request. Data and study protocol will be made available as part of publication.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Resistance Exercise

Clinical Trials on Experimental: Shopping bag carrying

Subscribe