Effect of HIIT on Post-Stroke Fatigue

December 8, 2025 updated by: Dr HUANG Mei Zhen, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University

Effect of High-Intensity Interval Training Intervention on Post-Stroke Fatigue in Chronic Stroke Survivors: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

This study aims to investigate the effect of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on fatigue severity among individuals with chronic stroke. Participants will be randomly assigned to the HIIT group, the moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) group, or the stretching group (active control). Each group will participate in supervised exercise sessions three times per week over a 12-week period, totaling 36 sessions. Outcome assessments will be conducted at baseline, mid-intervention (week 6), post-intervention (week 12), and follow-up (week 20). The primary outcome will be fatigue severity. Secondary outcomes will include inflammatory biomarkers and additional health-related indicators.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Age of 40-80 years;
  • a history of ischemic stroke resulting in unilateral limb impairment 6-60 months prior to consent to participate in the pilot trial;
  • a stable medical condition;
  • a subjective feeling of fatigue, defined as a period of apparent fatigue, decreased energy, increased need for rest, or fatigue out of proportion to physical activity for at least 2 weeks during the past month;
  • ability to communicate with the investigators and lack of significant cognitive deficits;
  • able to walk for 10 meters with or without a walking aid.

Exclusion criteria:

  • An FSS score of < 4 (20);
  • other neurological conditions;
  • other musculoskeletal comorbidities that would prevent safe participation in exercises;
  • a medical diagnosis of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease(s);
  • signs or symptoms indicative of significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, or metabolic disease(s) during the previous 3 months;
  • severe lower limb spasticity (Ashworth Scale score ≥ 3);
  • Botulinum toxin use in the affected lower limb within the past six months;
  • current or previous use of drugs intended to resolve post-stroke fatigue;
  • active engagement in other stroke rehabilitation trials.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: MICT
The MICT intervention will include a 3-minute warm-up, 25 minutes of continuous exercise performed at a moderate intensity, and a 2-minute cool-down. Participants will attend three supervised sessions per week over a 12-week period.
Active Comparator: Stretching
The stretching intervention will consist of 30 minutes of whole-body stretching. Participants will attend three sessions per week over a 12-week period.
Experimental: HIIT
The HIIT intervention will consist of a 3-minute warm-up, a 25-minute main exercise, and a 2-minute cool-down. The main exercise will include four 4-minute high-intensity intervals, each interspersed with a 3-minute low-intensity recovery period. Participants will attend three supervised sessions per week over a 12-week period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Eligibility rate (%)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.
Recruitment rate (number of participants per month)
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.
Through study completion, an average of 12 weeks.
Compliance with HIIT (%)
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12
From baseline to week 12
Fidelity to the HIIT protocol (%)
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12
From baseline to week 12
Retention of the intervention (%)
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12
From baseline to week 12
Adverse events (number of events)
Time Frame: From baseline to week 12
From baseline to week 12
Acceptability (qualitative)
Time Frame: At week 12
At week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The FSS consists of 9 items rated on a 7-point Likert scale from 1 (highly disagree) to 7 (highly agree). Higher scores indicate greater fatigue severity.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MDI)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory (MFI) is a 20-item self-report questionnaire designed to assess fatigue across five dimensions: General Fatigue, Physical Fatigue, Mental Fatigue, Reduced Motivation, and Reduced Activity. Each subscale contains 4 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Higher scores indicate greater fatigue. The total score ranges from 20 to 100.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.
The SF-36 includes 36 items and one additional item assessing perceived change in health over time. Each domain is scored on a scale from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.
Inflammatory biomarkers
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.
Inflammatory biomarkers will be quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kits obtained from commercial suppliers, following the manufacturer's instructions.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 6, and week 12.

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The HADS consists of 14 items, divided into two subscales: anxiety (HADS-A) and depression (HADS-D), each containing 7 items. Each item is scored on a 4-point Likert scale (0-3), resulting in subscale scores ranging from 0 to 21. Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety or depression.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The PSQI is consists of 19 items grouped into seven components. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer sleep quality.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Stroke Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (SSEQ)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The SSEQ is a 13-item self-report scale assessing stroke survivors' confidence in performing daily activities and managing post-stroke challenges. Each item is rated from 0 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). Total score ranges from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment-Lower Extremity
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
To assess motor recovery, Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment-Lower Extremity will be used, it score rangefrom 0 to 34; a high score is indicative of good motor recovery
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
6-Minute Walk Test
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Walking endurance will be assessed using the 6-Minute Walk Test. The participants will be allowed to use assistive devices, which will be documented and kept consistent across all of the time points.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Physical Activity Enjoyment Scale (PAES)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 6 and at week 12.
The PAES will be used to measure the participants' exercise enjoyment (score range: 0-56). A high score indicates a high level of activity enjoyment.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 6 and at week 12.
Behavioral Regulation In Exercise Questionnaire (BREQ-2)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 1, week 12, and week 20.
The BREQ-2 includes 19 items. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("not true for me") to 4 ("very true for me"). Higher scores reflect higher exercise motivation.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at week 1, week 12, and week 20.
Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (MiniBEST)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The Mini-BESTest consists of 14 items, including the Timed Up and Go test, with a maximum total score of 28 points. Higher scores indicate better balance performance.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB)
Time Frame: Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.
The SPPB comprises three components: balance tests (including side-by-side, semi-tandem, and tandem stances), a gait speed test, and a five-times sit-to-stand test. Each component is scored on a scale from 0 to 4, with a total possible score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate better physical performance.
Blinded assessors will conduct evaluations at baseline, week 12 , and week 20.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 15, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

First Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 9, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stroke

Clinical Trials on HIIT

Subscribe