The Effect of Mobile Robot Assisted Gait Training on Gait Performance in Chronic Patients With Impaired Gait Function After Burn Injury

December 10, 2025 updated by: So Young Joo, Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital

The Effect of Mobile Robot Assisted Gait Training on Gait Performance in Chronic Patients With Impaired Gait Function After Burn Injury : Pilot Study

This study aims to examine the clinical effectiveness of gait training using wearable robots in patients with impaired gait function after burn injury. The participants were chronic patients who underwent split-thickness skin grafting or burns of more than 50% of the lower extremities and still had impaired gait dysfunction 6 months later. Eligible participants were aged over 18 years and had a Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score of 3 or higher. Physiotherapy was performed on a one to one basis by qualified physiotherapists for 1 hour per day, 5 days a week Monday through Friday, for 12 weeks. Assessments were carried out before and immediately after the 12-week training period. Physical ability were assessed using the functional ambulatory category(FAC) scale, the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Spatiotemporal gait parameters-including gait speed, cadence, and step length-and sagittal joint kinematic parameters for the hip, knee, and ankle during stance and swing phases were measured during gait analysis. Pulmonary function test such as forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and carbon monoxide (DLco). The highest maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) value were evaluated.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regaining a mobility level post-surgery that comes close to the patient's previous mobility as a baseline is the goal. It is commonly accepted that conventional physiotherapy after burn injury has a positive impact on muscle strength, range of motion, pain or gait performance which all impact patient mobility. Wearable robots that assist walking centered on the hip joint of the lower extremities are appearing. This wearable robot is a positive effect in terms of increased energy efficiency and posture during walking. This study aims to examine the clinical effectiveness of gait training using wearable robots in patients with impaired gait function after burn injury. The participants were chronic patients who underwent split-thickness skin grafting or burns of more than 50%of the lower extremities and still had impaired gait dysfunction 6 months later. Eligible participants were aged over 18 years and had a Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score of 3 or higher. This study excluded patients with fourth-degree burns (involving muscles, tendons, and bone injuries), severe communication disorders because of intellectual impairment and psychological problems. The specific exclusion criteria were as follows. Patients with body types that prevent them form wearing the robot, such as a height of 4.59 feet (140cm) or 5.91 feet (185cm) or more, or severe obesity with a BMI of 35 or more. Patients with heart and circulatory conditions that may affect gait training. Patients at a high risk of falling during gait training, owing to severe dizziness and having experienced a fall within the preceeding 2 month.Physiotherapy was performed on a one to one basis by qualified physiotherapists for 1 hour per day, 5 days a week Monday through Friday, for 12 weeks. Assessments were carried out before and immediately after the 12-week training period. Physical ability were assessed using the functional ambulatory category(FAC) scale, the 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). Spatiotemporal gait parameters-including gait speed, cadence, and step length-and sagittal joint kinematic parameters for the hip, knee, and ankle during stance and swing phases were measured during gait analysis. Pulmonary function test such as forced vital capacity (FVC), 1-s forced expiratory volume (FEV1), and carbon monoxide (DLco). The highest maximal expiratory pressure (MEP) and maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP) value were evaluated.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Seoul, South Korea, 07247
        • Recruiting
        • Hangang sacred heart hodpital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • chronic patients who underwent split-thickness skin grafting or burns of more than 50% of the lower extremities and still had impaired gait dysfunction 6 months later. -aged over 18 years
  • had a Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) score of 3 or higher

Exclusion Criteria:

  • fourth-degree burns (involving muscles, tendons, and bone injuries)
  • severe communication disorders because of intellectual impairment and psychological problems
  • Patients with body types that prevent them form wearing the robot, such as a height of 4.59 feet (140cm) or 5.91 feet (185cm) or more, or severe obesity with a BMI of 35 or more.
  • Patients with heart and circulatory conditions that may affect gait training.
  • Patients at a high risk of falling during gait training, owing to severe dizziness and having experienced a fall within the preceeding 2 month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Wearable robot training
The wearable robot (WIRobotics Inc) is a wearable robot designed to provide assistive torque and resistive torque for hip movement. It is worn around the waist and thighs and weight approximately 1.6 kg. The main body and actuation parts are not located at the hip joints and back to avoid restricting body movements and to facilitate movement even in cramped spaces. Physiotherapy was performed on a one to one basis by qualified physiotherapists for 1 hour per day, 5 days a week Monday through Friday, for 12 weeks.
The wearable robot (WIRobotics Inc) is a wearable robot designed to provide assistive torque and resistive torque for hip movement. It is worn around the waist and thighs and weight approximately 1.6 kg. The main body and actuation parts are not located at the hip joints and back to avoid restricting body movements and to facilitate movement even in cramped spaces. Physiotherapy was performed on a one to one basis by qualified physiotherapists for 1 hour per day, 5 days a week Monday through Friday, for 12 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
functional ambulatory category
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Participants were rated on a six-point scale based on the level of physical assistance required for walking, regardless of whether an assistive device was used.
12 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT)
Time Frame: 12weeks
conducted according to standardized guidelines, on a 20-meter walking course. Patients were instructed to walk as far as possible in 6 min.
12weeks
visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 12 weeks
rate the degree of subjective pain during gait movement (0 points : when no pain was noted, and 10 points : when unbearable pain was noted).
12 weeks
sagittal joint kinematic parameters for the hip, knee, and ankle during stance and swing phases
Time Frame: 12 weeks
the total range of motion of hip, knee, and ankle during one gait cycle
12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 13, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 15, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 15, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 25, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HangangSHH-22

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns

Clinical Trials on wearable robot training

Subscribe