Health Advocate for Children After Liver Transplant (HEAL-Tx:RCT)

December 8, 2025 updated by: University of California, San Francisco

Health Advocate for Children After Liver Transplant: A Hybrid Implementation Effectiveness RCT

The HEAL-Tx is a 90-day intervention, in which a Health Advocate works with eligible families to identify and apply for community-based resources, alert healthcare providers to challenges the family is encountering, and guide health system navigation (e.g., coordinating appointments). Families in the control arm will receive a printed handout that provides contact information for local community-based resources. Families in the treatment arm will receive HEAL-Tx.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

HEAL-Tx trial is a Type 1 hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial across 6 U.S. transplant centers (UCSF, Seattle Children's Hospital, Stanford University, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, University of Pittsburgh, Children's Hospital of Colorado.) Children/families will be screened for material economic hardship as part of standard of care during their transplant hospitalization using the 10-question Accountable Healthcare Communities tool. Families who report material economic hardship will be approached for study participation, and those who consent will be randomized to either the control or treatment arm. Participants in the control arm will receive enhanced standard of care: they will receive a printed handout with a list of resources specific to their hardship and their home ZIP code. They will also receive a follow-up call at 45-days with a reminder of the suggested resources. Participants in the treatment arm will receive a customized 90-day Health Advocate intervention. Both the treatment and control arm group will complete a baseline interview and a close-out 90-day interview to assess outcomes and experiences with the intervention. The treatment arm will have one additional interview at the 45-day timepoint. Once both arms complete treatment, they will have data extracted from their medical records at the 1, and 2-year timepoint.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94158
        • University of California, San Francisco

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient <18 years old at the time of liver transplant
  • Received a liver transplant within past 90 days
  • Family endorses material economic hardship on 10-questions Accountable Healthcare Communities screening tool.
  • Will receive follow-up care for at least 2 years
  • Family can read or write English or Spanish
  • A Legally Authorized Representative (LAR) can provide consent, and for children (12-17 years of age, the child is willing/able to provide assent.)
  • Family has a working phone and smartphone device capable of receiving calls or virtual visits via Zoom.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has severe cognitive impairment.
  • 18 years of age or older at the time of consent
  • Patient unwilling or unable to consent/participate
  • Patient is a ward of the state (e.g. foster care) since present circumstances may not be reflective of child's past or future circumstances.
  • Non-English, non-Spanish speakers as ICFs, HIPAA authorization form, surveys, and interviews will only be available in these 2 languages. Languages besides English and Spanish are excluded from this study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Health Advocate Intervention
The caregiver will receive 90-days of tailored health advocate intervention
The health advocate is a trained individual who is not a part of the medical team. They work directly with the caregivers of patients who have received a liver transplantation to assist them with navigating the healthcare system, find resources, and relay any concerns to their medical team. They work with an assigned family for 90-days and tailor their intervention to meet the families social needs.
Other Names:
  • HA
Active Comparator: Enhanced Control
The caregiver will receive a printed sheet of resources once and a follow-up call at the 45-day timepoint with a reminder of the suggested resources.
Caregivers in the control arm will receive enhanced standard of care: they will be given a handout with a list of resources specific to their hardship and their home ZIP code. They will receive a follow-up call at 45 days with a reminder of the suggested resources.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time-to-TCMR between 90 days and 2 years post-transplant using Kaplan-Meir plots.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year up to 2 years.
After the perioperative period, it is an objective outcome closely linked with poor adherence/challenges with self-management. Investigators found strong associations between material economic hardship and TCMR episodes of TCMR increase risks of graft failure/death post-transplant and early TCMR increases risk of late TCMR and vulnerability to infections. All analyses will be intention-to-treat. Investigators will use Kaplan-Meier plots to descriptively compare survival distributions of the primary outcome (TCMR) by trial arm. We will compare time-to-TCMR between treatment arms using Cox regression. For participants recruited in years 1 & 2 of the study period, we will collect 2 years of follow-up data. For participants recruited in year 3, we will apply administrative censoring after 1 year of follow up data.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year up to 2 years.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of incidence of Medication Level Variability Index >2.0 using generalized linear mixed effect models.
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of one year up to 2 years.
An MLVI >2.0 predicted late TCMR, even after accounting for other causes of tacrolimus fluctuations. In the first 6 months after transplant, tacrolimus levels can fluctuate based on physiological changes associated with transplant. After 6 months, fluctuations are most likely related to poor adherence. Investigators will measure the incidence of MLVI >2.0 between 6 months - 1 year, and 1year and 2 years. If a patient has an episode of TCMR within this time, investigators will only collect tacrolimus levels preceding this event. Investigators will calculate MLVI based on available levels for 6 months - 1 year, and for 1year - 2 years. Investigators will use generalized linear mixed effects models for dichotomous outcomes to analyze MLVI >2.0. Models will also include random effects for each patient, and fixed effects that include trial arm, time since randomization and site. If differences in groups are observed, interaction terms may be introduced to assess heterogeneity in trends.
Through study completion, an average of one year up to 2 years.
Change in Parent-Reported Social Needs Score From Baseline to 90 Days (SIREN-Informed PRO Measure)
Time Frame: Baseline and 90-days post enrollment
Parent-reported social needs will be assessed using a SIREN-informed patient-reported outcome measure. Scores will be calculated at baseline and 90 days. Change scores will be compared between treatment arms using a t-test, and the primary analysis will use linear regression (ANCOVA) with the baseline score as a covariate to estimate the mean difference in change between groups.
Baseline and 90-days post enrollment
Liver inflammation (ALT or GGT >50) and overimmunosuppression (positive EBV or CMV PCR) at years 1 and 2 using linear mixed effects models.
Time Frame: An average of 1 year up to 2 years.
Investigators will use generalized linear mixed effects models for dichotomous outcomes to analyze liver inflammation and overimmunosuppression. Models will include random effects for each patient, and fixed effects for trial arm, time since randomization (allowing investigators to assess trends), and site.
An average of 1 year up to 2 years.
Parent-Reported Social Service Utilization (Count of Services Received)
Time Frame: 90-days post enrollment
Parents will report whether social services were received in the 90-day period following enrollment. Investigators will summarize utilization using counts and percentages and compare across centers using chi-square tests.
90-days post enrollment
Change in Parent-Reported Social Service Utilization From Baseline to 90 Days
Time Frame: Baseline and 90 days post-enrollment
Receipt of social services will be recorded at baseline and 90 days. The change in utilization will be compared between treatment arms using t-tests and modeled using ANCOVA with baseline utilization as a covariate.
Baseline and 90 days post-enrollment
Parent-Reported Social Needs Score at Baseline (SIREN-Informed PRO Measure)
Time Frame: Baseline
Baseline social needs scores will be summarized using medians and quartiles for continuous measures.
Baseline
Parent-Reported Social Needs Score at 90 Days (SIREN-Informed PRO Measure)
Time Frame: 90-days post enrollment
Follow-up social needs scores at 90 days will be summarized and compared across centers using Kruskal-Wallis tests.
90-days post enrollment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation outcomes using the RE-AIM model.
Time Frame: Baseline, Day-45 (treatment arm only), 90-day timepoints

Reach: Differences in EHR-abstracted sociodemographic characteristics and center differences (enrolled vs. declined) Adoption: Differences in adoption by clinician type Implementation: Identify factors from enrollment associated with quantitative implementation measures Maintenance: Investigators will analyze whether attrition rates differ by type

Investigators will collect interviews from both treatment arms at baseline and the 90-day timepoint. Patients in the treatment arm will have one additional qualitative interview (45-day timepoint.) The interviews will be recorded and transcribed. Codebooks will be developed for the caregiver, health advocate and clinician informant interviews using COM-B components to identify barriers and facilitators to adoption, implementation and maintenance. Investigators will iteratively refine and update the codebooks during data collection, allowing for open coding to occur to capture inductive codes. Each transcript will be coded by two coders.

Baseline, Day-45 (treatment arm only), 90-day timepoints

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sharad Wadhwani, MD, MPH, University of California, San Francisco

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

March 30, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 21, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 12, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 24-41233
  • 5K23DK132454 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pediatric Liver Transplanted Recipients

Clinical Trials on Health advocate

Subscribe