Bio-implant Root Analogue Versus Conventional Screw-type Implant for Management of Pier Abutment in Mandibular Distal Extension Cases

December 14, 2025 updated by: Hosam eldin Hegazy Mohamed Ebrahim Eid, Mansoura University

reviewing literature was lacking for bio implant and management of pier abutment in distal extension bases for this reason the aim of this research will be to use the bio implant in the management of pier abutment cases for distal extension denture base cases Aim of the study the aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the bioimplant root analogue implant with the conventional screw type implant the evaluation was done 0,3 and 6months of definitive prosthesis insertion regarding the following

  1. radiographic evaluation of the alveolar bone hight as related to the bio implant ,conventional screw implant , pier abutment and RPD abutments : this will be done using standardized periapical digital radiographs
  2. soft tissue evaluatins related to the bio implant ,conventional screw implant , pier abutment and RPD abutments this will be done using : A . modified plaque index (MPI) B . modified gingival index (MGI) C . peridontal pocket depth

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

8

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Dakahlia Governorate
      • Al Mansurah, Dakahlia Governorate, Egypt, 7650001
        • Mansoura University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The patients had bilateral mandibular free-end partially edentulous cases with a pier abutment or a planned presence of pier abutment.
  • The edentulous space mesial to the pier abutment has a hopeless tooth or root that was used for bio-implant insertion or conventional screw-type implants.
  • Healthy patients with no systemic disease that can affect the implant surgery. This was verified by medical history in addition to a report from the physician.
  • The patients have had dentulous maxillary jaw and mandibular free-end saddle for at least 6 months.
  • Class I maxillo-mandibular relationship with adequate inter-arch distance.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with metabolic disorders that affect osseointegration such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, immune disorders, and osteoporosis.
  • Patients with heavy smoking habit
  • Patients complaining of severe temporomandibular joint disorder.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: bioimolant
bioimplant assessement
construction of prothesis related to bioimplant or conventional implant
Experimental: screw type conventional implant
conventional screw type implant assessement
construction of prothesis related to bioimplant or conventional implant

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
bone changes and soft tissue changes
Time Frame: after 3 and 6 months of denture insertion
peri-implant bone and soft tissue changes and abutment teeth bone and soft tissue changes changes periapical X-ray for measurement of bone changes by millimeter periodontal probe for measurement of soft tissue changes by millimeter
after 3 and 6 months of denture insertion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 19, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 14, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Assesment

Clinical Trials on Implant

Subscribe