Breathing Pattern Description in Pneumonia Patients

December 12, 2025 updated by: Consorci Sanitari Integral

Noninvasive Breathing Pattern Monitoring in Patients With Acute Respiratory Failure Secondary to Pneumonia Requiring Hospital Admission: Differences Based on Clinical Outcomes

Surveillance and monitoring of patients with respiratory failure before or after undergoing mechanical ventilation is an underdeveloped area compared to the many possibilities of monitoring other non-invasive vital signs that we currently have.

Severe respiratory failure usually affects oxygenation and ventilation. Continuous or frequent non-invasive monitoring of oxygenation is performed with pulse oximetry, with a margin of error between 1 and 4% of arterial oxygen saturation of hemoglobin. Ventilation cannot be fully monitored in non-intubated patients: Measurement of respiratory rate (RR) outside the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) is usually performed intermittently and manually by the nurse, often with a wide margin of error and, regarding tidal volume (VT), it cannot currently be monitored either directly or indirectly in non-intubated patients because the measurement itself interferes with respiration. Similarly, data on inspiratory and expiratory flows cannot be obtained, which are also altered in certain pathologies. The technique considered as a "gold standard" is spirometry, which requires the collaboration of the patient, and the interpretation of the results depends on the performance of the technique in a standardized way. Spirometry offers a single value; continuous monitoring is not feasible and due to the bias of the technique.

More studies are needed to rule out the existence of different breathing patterns of acute respiratory failure and to identify outcome differences between them before recommending different support or treatment approaches.

In a preliminary not published study conducted with healthy volunteers, a good correlation was observed between changes in temperature inside the Venturi mask using two TSC50 thermistors and breathing pattern recorded by thoracic and abdominal plethysmographic bands.

HYPOTHESES: Monitoring respiratory activity, including both RR and the respiratory pattern (tidal volume, inspiratory flow, and the inspiration-to-expiration ratio), could enable early detection of respiratory patterns associated with the worsening of patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and severe pneumonia of other origins.

OBJECTIVES

Main Objective:

To evaluate the ability of the respiratory pattern to early detect respiratory deterioration in patients hospitalized pneumonia before requiring mechanical ventilation.

Specific Objectives:

To describe the initial respiratory pattern and its evolution throughout the hospital stay of patients with acute respiratory failure caused by SARS-CoV-2.

To describe the evolution of the respiratory pattern in patients with bacterial pneumonia admitted to the hospital who require supplemental oxygen.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

82

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Barcelona
      • Sant Joan Despí, Barcelona, Spain, 08970
        • Complex Hospitalari Universitari Moisès Broggi, Consorci Sanitari Integral

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with pneumonia admitted to the Intensive Care Unit, requiring oxygen supplementation to achieve an oxygen saturation (SpO2) greater than 92%.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia, community-acquired or hospital-acquired with moderate, severe, or critical severity criteria as defined by the World Health Organization, OR Diagnosis of presumably bacterial pneumonia FINE III, IV or V
  • Requirement for oxygen supplementation to achieve oxygen saturation (SpO2) greater than 92%
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-invasive ventilation or mechanical ventilation at the time of evaluation
  • Chronic noninvasive ventilation or oxygen therapy
  • Inclusion in experimental treatment studies where the administered treatment is unknown
  • Other more plausible cause of acute respiratory failure (ARF)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with pneumonia (coronavirus or bacterial infection) admitted to the Intensive Care Unit
Study patients with pneumonia and requirement for oxygen supplementation to achieve oxygen saturation greater than 92% were followed-up, and temperature sensors were be used to register temperature changes in expired air. Clinical evolution of these patients was recorded.
Temperature sensors from the SC50 series were used, with a single use for each patient. The signals from these sensors were recorded in the supine position with the head elevated at 30º, if possible while the patient was at rest and silent. Simultaneous recordings were be made using the BIOPAC MP 160 system with general-purpose amplifiers (DA 100C).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical evolution outcome
Time Frame: From admission to the Intensive Care Unit until discharge or unfavorable outcome, whichever come first , assessed up to two weeks.

An unfavorable outcome was defined whenever the patient presented with any of the following:

  • PaO2/FiO2 less than 100
  • initiation of High-flow Nasal Oxygen Therapy, or invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation
  • death Otherwise the outcome was considered as favorable.
From admission to the Intensive Care Unit until discharge or unfavorable outcome, whichever come first , assessed up to two weeks.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 24, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 28, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 11, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Respiratory Failure (ARF)

Clinical Trials on Temperature sensors located in the Venturi mask, placed around the nose and mouth

Subscribe