BLOOM: Pragmatic Feasibility Trial

February 4, 2026 updated by: Erin Barreto, Mayo Clinic
The goal of this study is to compare two different ways of dosing cefepime, an antibiotic for very sick patients - the usual approach to dosing or a new dosing method. The new dosing method uses only doses that are available in normal care, but choosing between the different doses is based on more information about the patient's body including their kidney function. The primary purpose of this study is to test how easy it is for healthcare professionals to use the new dosing method and how best to conduct the trial. The study will also assess if the new dosing method helps patients recover faster and reduces side effects.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

300

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults ≥18 years of age
  • Admitted to one of the ICUs at the study center
  • Prescribed cefepime therapy by the care team

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals will be those with a cephalosporin allergy
  • Received >1 dose of cefepime in the 24 hours before ICU admission
  • Transferred from an external hospital without compatible EHR
  • Does not have a cystatin C and a creatinine available for drug dosing
  • Acute kidney injury stage 2 or higher
  • Receiving renal replacement therapy
  • Treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation
  • Undergoing molecular adsorbent recirculating therapy at the time of beta-lactam initiation
  • Pregnant
  • Incarcerated
  • Declined Minnesota research authorization

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Up-front individualized dosing algorithm
Clinical decision support to encourage use of an individualized cefepime dosing algorithm based on eGFRcr-cysC and weight.
An individualized cefepime dosing algorithm will be used to determine the cefepime dose and interval. The dose recommendation will be provided using the EHR-prompts to the clinical care team and ordered and/or verified by the ICU pharmacist using an established collaborative practice agreement. As a pragmatic trial, at any point care teams may modify the empiric or subsequent dose based on their clinical judgement.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
The standard of care group will receive empiric dosing of cefepime, using an institutional antimicrobial guide based on four categories of eGFRcr.
The standard of care group will receive empiric dosing guided by an institutional antimicrobial guide. Cefepime is typically dosed at 0.5-2 g every 8-24 h according to categorical thresholds of estimated creatinine clearance (eGFRcr). Cystatin C and eGFRcr-cys can be calculated and used at clinicians' discretion to aid in drug dose determination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of patients screened who qualified for the study
Time Frame: 1 year or once the sample size is achieved
Number of patients who quality for the study out of total number of patients screened, reported as a percentage
1 year or once the sample size is achieved
Distribution of qualified patients across care teams
Time Frame: 1 year or once the sample size is achieved
Number of patients from each ICU care team who qualify for the study
1 year or once the sample size is achieved
Adherence to dosing recommendations
Time Frame: 1 year or once the sample size is achieved
Total number of patients randomized to the up-front individualized dosing algorithm who are prescribed the algorithm's recommended dosage
1 year or once the sample size is achieved

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of antibiotic-free days
Time Frame: 28-days
Number of antibiotic-free days for the first 28 days
28-days
ICU length of stay
Time Frame: 1 year
Number of days of initial ICU stay
1 year
Proportion of patients who experience new anti-Pseudomonal beta-lactam resistance
Time Frame: 6 months
New anti-Pseudomonal beta-lactam resistance which develops within the 6 months following initial treatment
6 months
Proportion of patients who experience clinical success
Time Frame: 8 days
Complete or partial resolution of clinical signs and symptoms attributed to infection across 8 days of therapy.
8 days
Proportion of patients who experience microbiologic success
Time Frame: 8 days
Presumed or documented eradication of causative microorganisms
8 days
Mortality
Time Frame: 28-days
All cause death
28-days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Erin Barreto, PharmD, PhD, Mayo Clinic

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 20, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sepsis

Clinical Trials on Up-front individualized dosing algorithm

Subscribe