- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01626729
Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels
June 20, 2012 updated by: Christina Roberto, Yale University
Facts-Up-Front Versus Traffic-Light Food Labels: A Randomized Controlled Trial
The U.S. food and beverage industry recently released a new front-of-package nutrition labeling system called Facts Up Front that will be used on thousands of food products.
The purpose of this study was to test consumer understanding of the Facts Up Front nutrition labeling system compared to the Multiple Traffic Light system (Traffic Light).
Facts Up Front displays grams/milligrams and % daily value information for various nutrients; Traffic Light uses an interpretive color-coded scheme to alert consumers to low, medium or high levels of certain nutrients.
Participants in an Internet-based study were randomized to one of five front-of-package label conditions: 1) No Label; 2) Traffic Light; 3) Traffic Light plus information about protein and fiber (Traffic Light+); 4) Facts Up Front; or 5) Facts Up Front plus information about "nutrients to encourage" (Facts Up Front+).
Total percentage correct quiz scores were generated reflecting participants' ability to compare two foods on nutrient levels, based on their labels, and to estimate amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber and protein in foods.
703 adult participants recruited through an online database in May 2011 participated in this Internet-based study and data were analyzed in June 2011.
The investigators hypothesized that the Traffic Light label groups would perform better than the Facts Up Front groups on all outcomes.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
703
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Connecticut
-
New Haven, Connecticut, United States, 06520
- Survey Sampling International & Yale University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participants in Survey Sampling International Panels
Exclusion Criteria:
- Younger than 18 years old
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Traffic Light
|
A kilocalories (calories) per serving label and a Traffic Light symbol with High/Med/Low text indicating amounts of saturated fat, total sugars, and sodium per serving.
|
Experimental: Traffic Light+
|
A calories per serving label and a Traffic Light symbol with High/Med/Low text indicating amounts of saturated fat, total sugars, sodium, fiber and protein per serving.
|
Experimental: Facts Up Front
|
A label displaying calories, saturated fat, sodium, and total sugars per serving.
Nutrient amounts were listed in grams/milligrams and % Daily Values (%DVs), which indicate whether a serving of food is high or low in a nutrient based on daily value recommendations for a 2,000 calorie diet, were included.
This symbol was created based on the Facts Up Front symbol description provided by the Grocery Manufacturers Association and Food Marketing Institute, without the inclusion of nutrients to encourage.
|
Experimental: Facts Up Front+
|
A label displaying calories, saturated fat, sodium, and total sugars per serving.
The label also showed two (out of the possible eight) nutrients to encourage with the highest %DV.
Nutrient amounts were listed in grams/milligrams and %DVs were included.
This symbol was based directly on the Facts Up Front symbol description provided by the Grocery Manufacturers Association and Food Marketing Institute.
|
Placebo Comparator: No front of package label
|
No label control group
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Nutrient Comparison and Nutrient Level Estimation Accuracy
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants took a nutrient level comparison quiz asking them to identify which of two products presented side-by-side in the same food category were higher or lower in different nutrients.
Participants also viewed 8 individual products and estimated whether the product had low, medium or high amounts of saturated fat, sugar, sodium, fiber, and protein.
The primary outcomes were total percentage correct on these quizzes.
|
Baseline
|
Perceptions of Health, Taste and Purchase Intent
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants rated how healthy they thought each individual product was, how good it would taste and their likelihood to buy the product for themselves and their children (answered only by those who reported having children) using a 9-point Likert scale.
Each set of ratings was averaged across eight products.
|
Baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Consumer Label Preferences
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Composite scores were created based on several items assessing ease of label interpretation and understanding, label complexity, and degree of label confusion.
|
Baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Christina A Roberto, PhD, Yale University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2011
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2011
Study Completion (Actual)
May 1, 2011
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
June 14, 2012
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 20, 2012
First Posted (Estimate)
June 25, 2012
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
June 25, 2012
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 20, 2012
Last Verified
June 1, 2012
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- 1101007870
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Food Labeling
-
University of Paris 13ELIOR GESTIONCompletedFood LabelingFrance
-
Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, MexicoCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalRobert Wood Johnson FoundationCompletedFood LabelingUnited States
-
University of Paris 13Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, FranceCompleted
-
Cornell UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development... and other collaboratorsCompletedObesity | Diet | Health Behavior | Food LabelingUnited States
-
University of Paris 13BVA nudge unitCompletedConsumer Behavior | Nutrition Labeling
-
Yale UniversityHispanic Health Council, Inc.; Wholesome WaveRecruitingFood Insecurity | Food Preferences | Food SelectionUnited States
-
University at BuffaloNot yet recruitingFood Preferences | Food Habits
-
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)Bioaraba Health Research Institute; Basque Government Department of Public... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruiting
-
Purdue UniversityUniversity of Kentucky Center for Poverty Research; North Central Nutrition...Completed
Clinical Trials on Traffic Light
-
Duke-NUS Graduate Medical SchoolNational Medical Research Council (NMRC), SingaporeCompletedDiet Modification | Food Preferences | Diet Habit | Food Selection | Nutrition PoorSingapore
-
Unity Health TorontoRoche Pharma AGCompletedMultiple SclerosisChile, Argentina, Canada, Spain
-
Instituto Nacional de Salud Publica, MexicoCompleted
-
Massachusetts General HospitalHarvard School of Public Health (HSPH)CompletedObesity PreventionUnited States
-
National University of SingaporeNational Medical Research Council (NMRC), SingaporeCompleted
-
University of TorontoCompletedCardiovascular Diseases | Diet Modification | NutritionCanada
-
Nanyang Technological UniversityNational Research Foundation, Singapore; Ministry of National Development,... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMental Fatigue | Inhibition | Heart Rate Variability | Working Memory | Cognitive Fatigue | Behavioral Performance | Skin Conductance | Positive and Negative Affect | Perceived RestorationSingapore
-
St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixCompletedNeurological DiseasesUnited States
-
University of CalgaryWithdrawn
-
Makerere UniversityNot yet recruitingDriver Yield to PedestriansUganda