Tenotomy Versus no Tenotomy LHB in Rotator Cuff Repair

December 4, 2025 updated by: Josep Maria Mora Guix, Consorci Sanitari de Terrassa

Tenotomy Versus no Tenotomy of the Long Head of the Biceps in Rotator Cuff Repair: Clinical-functional Analysis and Ultrasound Evaluation

The function of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in the glenohumeral joint generates controversy among researchers. For some, the tendon does not have a significant function in the shoulder, while others consider it acts as a depressor of the humeral head and a stabilizer of the joint. These functions may be enhanced in cases of rotator cuff injuries, where compensatory hypertrophy and/or instability of the LHBT can occur, which can also be a source of pain. One of the imaging techniques used for diagnosing these injuries is ultrasound.

Initially, G. Walch proposed tenotomy of the LHBT in massive rotator cuff tears to improve pain and, in some cases, shoulder function. Currently, many authors advocate tenotomy of the LHBT as an adjunct to rotator cuff repair to avoid postoperative pain. However, there is no evidence that this procedure improves the clinical outcomes of isolated rotator cuff repair.

Based on the pathophysiology of the LHBT associated with rotator cuff injuries and the current trend to perform tenotomies in conjunction with cuff repair, the objectives of this doctoral thesis project were:

To compare the clinical and imaging outcomes of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs with and without LHBT tenotomy.

To analyze the position and cross-sectional area of the LHBT in the bicipital groove using ultrasound in cases with and without tenotomy.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 40 and 65 years
  • Partial supraspinatus tears (≥ 50% thickness)
  • Complete supraspinatus tears ≤ 3 cm in the coronal plane
  • Muscle atrophy less than stage 2 according to Thomazeau
  • Presence of the LHBT in the bicipital groove

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients younger than 40 or older than 65 years
  • LHBT rupture
  • Partial supraspinatus tears < 50% thickness
  • Supraspinatus tears > 3 cm
  • Tears of other rotator cuff tendons, with or without supraspinatus involvement
  • Traumatic tears with surgery performed less than 3 months after injury
  • Muscle atrophy ≥ stage 2 Thomazeau
  • Associated degenerative glenohumeral pathology (> Samilson 1)
  • Previous shoulder surgeries
  • Previous shoulder infections
  • Associated peripheral neurological injuries
  • Degenerative neurological conditions
  • Patients who refused to sign informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: NO TENOTOMY
NO TENOTOMY OF LHBT + ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
Experimental: TENOTOMY
TENOTOMY OF LHBT + ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR
ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Constant Murley
Time Frame: 24 month

100-point standardized tool for assessing shoulder function, comprising four domains Pain (0-15 points) daily life activity (0-20 points) range of motion (0-40 points) strenght (0-25 points)

0 (the worst) - 100 (the best)

24 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
ASES
Time Frame: 24 MONTHS

The ASES score (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) is a 100-point questionnaire used to assess shoulder function and pain, with a higher score indicating better outcomes.

From 0 (worst) to 100 (best).

24 MONTHS
cross sectional area of the LHBT
Time Frame: 24 months

Ultrasound Imaging: Integrity of the supraspinatus tendon (SST) repair, presence of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) in the bicipital groove (BG), and cross-sectional area of the LHBT at three levels of the BG (proximal, middle, and distal).

mesured in mm2

24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2015

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2017

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 30, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 17, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 4, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff Tears

Clinical Trials on ROTATOR CUFF REPAIR

Subscribe