PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia (PREMEDIA) (PREMEDIA)

May 18, 2026 updated by: John Pandolfino, Northwestern University

PREcision MEDicine In Achalasia - A Multicenter Randomized Non-Inferiority Clinical Trial of Short Tailored POEM vs. Standard POEM for Non-Spastic Achalasia and A Multicenter Prospective Cohort Study of Long Tailored POEM for Spastic Esophageal Motility Disorders

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if shorter Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) works as well as a longer POEM in patients with trouble swallowing due to certain conditions. The main question[s] it aims to answer [is/are]:

  • Does making a smaller cut in the muscle at the bottom of the esophagus work just as well as making the standard bigger cut in relieving symptoms?
  • Does making the smaller cut reduce the side effects of the procedure compared to the standard bigger cut? Researchers will compare the symptoms and side effects of making a shorter cut to the symptoms and side effects of a longer cut.

Participants will allow researchers to access their standard of care information in their medical record, complete questionnaires at up to 6 times over a 2-year period.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators will perform a randomized controlled trial to compare two different approaches to Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) for treating achalasia (Types I and II) and esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction (EGJOO). The most widely used treatment for achalasia is POEM but the current approach involves a 9 cm (3.5 inch) myotomy (cutting of the muscle) to open up the tight lower esophageal sphincter to promote food delivery from the esophagus to the stomach. This approach is very effective, with success rates of approximately 90% over the short term. However, the investigators believe that POEM does not require a full 9 cm myotomy and that the investigators can cut much less muscle (approximately 4cm/1.25inches) to achieve similar improvement in symptoms but with less long-term complications. Cutting less muscle may result in less acid reflux, which is the Achilles heel of any successful treatment for achalasia. A shorter muscle cut may also result in less of a complication known as blown-out myotomy, which causes failure of the esophagus to empty its contents and is a major cause of long-term symptom relapse. The investigators have designed this study to determine whether the shorter myotomy (4 cm) is equivalent to the longer myotomy (9 cm) in terms if symptom improvement, but with the possibility of less acid reflux and blown-out myotomy.

Given these questions, the investigators will enroll 370 patients in a randomized trial where patients will receive either the short tailored (4cm/1.25 inches) or the standard myotomy (9cm/3.5 inches). All patients will undergo intraoperative assessment of success of the myotomy by using a special tool called the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP). The FLIP will measure the opening dimensions of the lower esophageal sphincter and ensure that the myotomy is adequately performed so that the lower esophageal sphincter can open to a level that will improve esophageal emptying/swallowing. The investigators will follow patients for 2 years in a manner similar to how the investigators would follow patients after achalasia treatment in standard clinical practice. The investigators will assess whether symptoms are similar and whether or not there are differences in acid reflux and esophageal emptying. Patients will undergo follow up testing with questionnaires at intervals of 3-6 months over two years and they will have reflux testing (measure acid exposure using a capsule placed during endoscopy) between 6-12 months and a barium esophagram (X ray while drinking barium) at 2 years. The most important aim is to prove that the symptoms and outcomes success/failure) between the two approaches are similar (short myotomy is non-inferior) and the Eckardt score will be the primary questionnaire score for this study. The investigators believe that this study will help define the optimal approach to POEM in achalasia and also help us prevent complications in the future.

Additionally, the investigators will also ask participants to provide a sample of the muscle tissue that is typically cut during the POEM. This tissue will help us develop a tissue bank to help other researchers looking into the causes of why achalasia and these other esophageal diseases occur. The participants can opt out of this part and still continue in the randomized controlled trial.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

372

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Arizona
      • Scottsdale, Arizona, United States, 85259
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Mayo Clinic Arizona
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92093
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of California San Diego
    • Colorado
      • Denver, Colorado, United States, 80217
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Colorado Denver
    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32611
        • Not yet recruiting
        • University of Florida
      • Orlando, Florida, United States, 32803
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Adventist Health System/Sunbelt, Inc
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30322
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Emory University
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60611
        • Recruiting
        • Northwestern University
        • Principal Investigator:
          • John Pandolfino, MD
        • Contact:
    • Maryland
      • Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21218
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Johns Hopkins University
    • Missouri
      • St Louis, Missouri, United States, 63130
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Washington University
    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10065
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Weill Cornell Medical College
    • Ohio
      • Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Case Western Reserve University
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75204
        • Not yet recruiting
        • Baylor Scott & White Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18
  2. Type I achalasia or type II achalasia or cEGJOO
  3. Eckardt score > 3

Exclusion Criteria

The following exclusion criteria are for the RCT, but 1-13 below also pertain to the observational study:

  1. Prior POEM
  2. Prior surgical treatment for achalasia
  3. Endoscopic pneumatic dilation or lower esophageal sphincter botulinum toxin (botox) injection within 6 months
  4. Prior unrelated esophageal or upper gastric surgery, including Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy
  5. Prior endoscopic gastroesophageal intervention for obesity or GERD, such endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty or transoral incisionless fundoplication
  6. Known secondary achalasia related to malignancy (pseudoachalasia)
  7. Known eosinophilic esophagitis
  8. Diverticulum (> 2 cm) in distal esophagus
  9. Megaesophagus
  10. Fibroinflammatory stricture of the esophagus due to any etiology (e.g., peptic, radiation, eosinophilic)
  11. Pregnancy
  12. Standard contraindications to general anesthesia
  13. Standard contraindications to endoscopic myotomy in the esophagus (e.g. untreated varices)
  14. Unwillingness or inability to consent for the study
  15. Anticipated inability to follow protocol
  16. Weekly (or more frequent) opioid medication use in the last 2 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Standard Myotomy
Myotomy during POEM of 8-10 cm in length, extending 2-3 cm into the gastric cardia; intention to perform selective circular myotomy, but allowing full thickness myotomy. FLIP is used to confirm adequate myotomy.
Experimental: Tailored Short Myotomy
Myotomy during POEM of 4-5 cm in length, extending 1-2 cm into the gastric cardia; intend to perform selective circular myotomy, but allowing full thickness myotomy. FLIP is used to confirm adequate myotomy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical Response-Overall
Time Frame: From enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response is defined by the Eckardt score (a 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia) with no need for retreatment in 2 years.
From enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response-by Sex
Time Frame: From enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response is defined by the Eckardt score (a 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia) with no need for retreatment in 2 years.
From enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response-by Race
Time Frame: From Enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response is defined by the Eckardt score (a 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia) with no need for retreatment in 2 years.
From Enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response-by Ethnicity
Time Frame: From Enrollment to Year 2
Clinical Response is defined by the Eckardt score (a 4-item self-report scale measuring weight loss, chest pain, regurgitation, and dysphagia) with no need for retreatment in 2 years.
From Enrollment to Year 2

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 23, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 19, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Type I Achalasia

Clinical Trials on Standard Myotomy

Subscribe