- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07294092
Ketamine and Propofol NeuroImaging (KAPNI)
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There are four independent drug-administration sessions, visits 1, 3, 5, and 7. In all four of these sessions, both drugs are received, but in two different sequences. Two of these are EEG sessions and two are MRI sessions. Both EEG and MRI will have the same two drug orderings:
- Propofol alone, followed by ketamine and propofol together
- Ketamine alone, followed by propofol and ketamine together Assignment to propofol alone first, versus ketamine alone first will be randomized. But, all subjects will be assigned to receive both drug orderings under both EEG monitoring and MRI acquisition.
A follow-up memory testing visit will occur the day after each MRI/EEG session, on visits 2, 4, 6, and 8. No drugs are given during the next-day testing sessions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Early Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Keith M Vogt, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 4126473147
- Email: kev18@pitt.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
- Recruiting
- University of Pittsburgh
-
Contact:
- Keith M Vogt, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 4126473147
- Email: kev18@pitt.edu
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults 18-59 years of age, who:
- have none of the specific exclusion criteria
- have a valid email address and valid phone number throughout the study
- free from any non-MRI compatible implants
Exclusion Criteria:
- are pregnant or attempting to conceive
- body mass index (BMI) > 35
- significant memory impairment or hearing loss
- sleep apnea
- chronic pain or frequently taking pain medication
- chronic medical conditions requiring treatment (hypertension, diabetes, high cholesterol)
- neurologic disease, including seizures and tremor
- psychiatric diagnoses, including anxiety, depression, panic, or PTSD
- a history of any of these medical conditions: abnormal heartbeats (cardiac conduction abnormality or arrhythmia), liver or kidney disease, or significant lung disease
- severe claustrophobia or intolerance of an MRI
- have metal implants or non-removable metal piercings
- having a history of adverse reaction to ketamine or propofol
- daily alcohol or heavy alcohol use; history of alcohol abuse
- current daily smoker
- regular or recent marijuana use (including prescribed/medical marijuana)
- illicit drug use, i.e., street drugs
- regularly taking: antiepileptics, antidepressants, anti-psychotics, antihistamines, anti-anxiety medication, stimulants, or sleep-aids
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Basic Science
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Propofol, followed by propofol+ketamine (given at first visit)
EEG will be done at either visits 1 and 3 or 5 and 7; fMRI will be done at the other two (non-EEG) visits. |
Subjects will receive an intravenous infusion of this drug, during portions of the study.
Other Names:
Subjects will receive an intravenous infusion of this drug, during portions of the study.
Other Names:
Experimental acute pain stimulus will be delivered using a nerve stimulator.
These painful shocks will be paired with specific experimental events.
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Ketamine, followed by ketamine+propofol (given at first visit)
EEG will be done at either visits 1 and 3 or 5 and 7; fMRI will be done at the other two (non-EEG) visits. |
Subjects will receive an intravenous infusion of this drug, during portions of the study.
Other Names:
Subjects will receive an intravenous infusion of this drug, during portions of the study.
Other Names:
Experimental acute pain stimulus will be delivered using a nerve stimulator.
These painful shocks will be paired with specific experimental events.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Explicit Memory Performance, comparing single-drug to drug-combination condition
Time Frame: Visits 2, 4, 6, and 8. Visits spaced at least 1 week apart, are 1 hour in length, and are 12-36 hours after the preceding visit (1, 3, 5, and 7).
|
Recognition memory testing, using the Remember-Know procedure, in which subjects indicate whether they recognize previously experienced experimental items among novel items (not previously in the experiment).
This allows calculation of interdependent measures of recollection & familiarity using the signal detection statistic, d'.
d' is calculated as the cumulative Gaussian distribution of false positive responses subtracted from the cumulative Gaussian distribution of correctly identified previously-experienced items.
d' is on a (theoretically infinite) scale of standard deviation units, with negative values representing performance worse than chance guessing and positive values representing stand deviations of performance above chance.
|
Visits 2, 4, 6, and 8. Visits spaced at least 1 week apart, are 1 hour in length, and are 12-36 hours after the preceding visit (1, 3, 5, and 7).
|
|
Pain intensity and unpleasantness ratings, comparing single-drug to drug-combination condition
Time Frame: Visits 1, 3, 5, and 7: immediately following each experimental condition. These visits are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart.
|
Numerical rating scale (0-10) pain score difference, comparing the single-drug condition to the steady-state dose of the drug-combination condition.
Higher pain scores indicate more pain; a positive difference between pain scores during the single-drug condition minus the value during the steady-state dose of the combination-drug condition indicates pain reduction (a better outcome).
|
Visits 1, 3, 5, and 7: immediately following each experimental condition. These visits are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart.
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
MRI-based activation during memory formation, comparing the single-drug condition to the combination-drug condition
Time Frame: MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
The Z-score is calculated by linear regression of the task timing against the MRI signal time-course (MRI data is in arbitrary units with no maximum or minimum) at each voxel (single data point in brain).
Z-score of 0 indicates no task-related changes.
Z-scores further from zero indicate a larger difference in brain activity, with positive values indicating decreases under the combination-drug condition, while negative Z-scores indicate increases under the combination-drug condition, compared to the single-drug condition.
This outcome is reported as a number, as it is calculated using all the data across subjects combined into one statistical measure for the overall strength of difference in MRI signal change between two groups of data.
Dispersion measures cannot be calculated for the summary Z-score.
|
MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
|
MRI-based activation during painful stimulation, comparing the single-drug condition to the combination-drug condition
Time Frame: MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
The Z-score is calculated by linear regression of the task timing against the MRI signal time-course (MRI data is in arbitrary units with no maximum or minimum) at each voxel (single data point in brain).
Z-score of 0 indicates no task-related changes.
Z-scores further from zero indicate a larger difference in brain activity, with positive values indicating decreases under the combination-drug condition, while negative Z-scores indicate increases under the combination-drug condition, compared to the single-drug conditions.
This outcome is reported as a number, as it is calculated using all the data across subjects combined into one statistical measure for the overall strength of difference in MRI signal change between two groups of data.
Dispersion measures cannot be calculated for the summary Z-score.
|
MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
|
MRI-based changes in functional connectivity, comparing the single-drug condition to the combination-drug condition
Time Frame: MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
Functional connectivity (FC) measures the correlation of MRI signal time-series between brain regions.
Changes in FC reflect differences in brain state, in this case between single-drug and combination-drug conditions.
A T-statistic of 0 indicates no change; more positive scores mean stronger connectivity in the single-drug condition, and more negative scores mean stronger connectivity with the combination-drug condition.
This outcome is a number reflecting the overall magnitude of difference between two datasets, calculated in one summary statistic.
Dispersion measures cannot be calculated for the T-statistic in this analysis framework.
|
MRI visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute MRI scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
|
EEG-based changes in functional connectivity, comparing single-drug to combination-drug condition.
Time Frame: EEG visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute EEG scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
Functional connectivity (FC) measures the correlation of MRI signal time-series between brain regions.
Changes in FC reflect differences in brain state, in this case between single-drug and combination-drug conditions.
A T-statistic of 0 indicates no change; more positive scores mean stronger connectivity in the single-drug condition, and more negative scores mean stronger connectivity with the combination-drug condition.
This outcome is a number reflecting the overall magnitude of difference between two datasets, calculated in one summary statistic.
Dispersion measures cannot be calculated for the T-statistic in this analysis framework.
|
EEG visits (1 and 3, or 5 and 7), which are are 3 hours in length and spaced at least 1 week apart. Data collected at 3 timepoints in 8-minute EEG scans: at baseline, under one drug, and under both drugs.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Keith M Vogt, MD, PhD, University of Pittsburgh
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Signs and Symptoms
- Pain
- Organic Chemicals
- Therapeutics
- Hydrocarbons
- Cyclohexanes
- Cycloparaffins
- Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic
- Hydrocarbons, Cyclic
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Hydrocarbons, Aromatic
- Phenols
- Benzene Derivatives
- Rehabilitation
- Anesthesia and Analgesia
- Electric Stimulation Therapy
- Analgesia
- Propofol
- Ketamine
- Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY25110029
- R35GM146822 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
De-identified data to share:
- age, height, weight, sex
- survey results quantifying pain predispositions (catastrophizing, vigilance & anxiety), depression, anxiety, stress, and sleep
- pain intensity & unpleasantness ratings
- observer assessment of sedation ratings
- Behavioral performance data for long-term memory
- structural and functional MRI images
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain
-
Boston Scientific CorporationRecruitingLow Back Pain | Chronic Pain | Chronic Low-back Pain | Leg Pain | Intractable Pain | Chronic Leg PainUnited States
-
Qi's ClinicNot yet recruitingNon-Cancer Pain,Musculoskeletal Pain,Chronic Pain,Acute Pain
-
Flowonix MedicalApproved for marketingBack Pain | Leg Pain | Trunk Pain | Intractable Pain | Arm Pain
-
George Washington UniversityRecruitingCervical Fusion | Pain, Back | Pain, Neck | Myofacial PainUnited States
-
Atatürk Chest Diseases and Chest Surgery Training...RecruitingPostoperative Pain | Postoperative Pain, Acute | Postoperative Pain, Chronic | VATSTurkey
-
Janssen Research & Development, LLCCompletedPain, Radiating | Pain, Burning | Pain, Crushing | Pain, Migratory | Pain, SplittingUnited States, France, Spain, Poland, Portugal
-
Universitat Jaume ICompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | OncologySpain
-
susanne beckerSNSFCompletedLow Back Pain | Pain, Acute | Pain, ChronicSwitzerland
-
University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinZealand University Hospital; European Regional Development Fund; Design School...CompletedPain, Acute | Pain, Chronic | Pain Measurement | Pain, CancerGermany
-
University of Campinas, BrazilCompletedPREGNANCY | LUMBAR BACK PAIN | PELVIC PAIN
Clinical Trials on Propofol
-
Nurdan SağbaşActive, not recruitingMajor Depression | Bipolar Affective Disorder | Bipolar Depression Depressed PhaseTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Groupe Hospitalier Diaconesses Croix Saint-SimonCompletedOocyte Retrieval | Medically Assisted Procreation (MAP)France
-
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research...Not yet recruitingEndoscopic Submucosal Dissection | Respiratory Complications | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | Endoscopy Unit
-
Hacettepe UniversityRecruitingSedation | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | Intensive Care Unit SedationTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Istanbul University - CerrahpasaRecruitingAtrial Fibrillation | Deep Sedation | Electric CountershockTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Stanford UniversityTiny Blue Dot FoundationEnrolling by invitationHealthy VolunteersUnited States
-
Hopital FochCompleted
-
Istanbul UniversityRecruitingTotal Intravenous Anesthesia | Spinal (Fusion) Surgery | Target Controlled Infusion of Propofol | BIS-EEG | Anesthesia Depth MonitoringTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Konkuk University Medical CenterCompletedCoronary Artery Disease | Valvular Heart DiseaseKorea, Republic of
-
Marmara University Pendik Training and Research...RecruitingPediatric Anesthesia | Postoperative Agitations in Pediatric Patients | Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting (PONV) | Emergence Delirium in Pediatric AnesthesiaTurkey (Türkiye)