- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07296068
Can Acute Photobiomodulation Improve Balance and Cognition in Individuals With Ataxia: a Pilot Feasibility Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial.
Cerebellar ataxias cause progressive impairments in balance, gait coordination, motor timing, and cognitive functions such as attention and executive control (Buckner, 2013; Salmi et al., 2010; Timmann & Daum, 2007). These symptoms substantially reduce independence and quality of life, and current treatments remain limited. There is an urgent need for safe, low-burden interventions that can support everyday functioning and potentially enhance compensatory neural processes.
Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) uses red and near-infrared light (600-1100 nm) to modulate mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase, increasing ATP production, reducing oxidative stress, and improving cerebral blood flow (Hamblin, 2016; Salehpour et al., 2019). Several studies show that tPBM can acutely improve cognitive performance and motor control in both healthy adults and clinical groups (Barrett & Gonzalez-Lima, 2013; Chan et al., 2019; Henderson & Morries, 2017). A growing neurobiological literature suggests that light can penetrate posterior cortical areas sufficiently to modulate networks involving cerebellar-cortical loops (Jagdeo et al., 2012).
Importantly for ataxia, preliminary work shows that tPBM may acutely improve balance stability and gait metrics in older adults and patients with neurological conditions (Moro et al., 2022; Shin et al., 2021). In our own laboratory, we have observed immediate improvements in sway range and cognitive control in older adults after a 24-minute tPBM session applied over midline and posterior scalp regions. These medium to large size effects are consistent with enhanced sensorimotor integration and improved control of attention in distracting environments.
Given that individuals with cerebellar ataxia experience both motor incoordination and difficulties in maintaining cognitive stability under distracting conditions, tPBM is a promising non-pharmacological intervention worth preliminary investigation.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Jonathan J Sinclair, DSc
- Phone Number: +44787565153
- Email: jksinclair@lancashire.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Lancashire
-
Preston, Lancashire, United Kingdom, PR1 2HE
- University of Central Lancashire
-
Contact:
- Sinclair
- Phone Number: 07875651533
- Email: jksinclair@lancashire.ac.uk
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18-70 years (inclusive)
- Diagnosis of ataxia
- Able to walk independently for at least 5 minutes, with or without an assistive device
- Able to stand safely for balance testing, with or without an assistive device
- Hemodynamically stable (stable blood pressure and heart rate at rest)
- On a stable medication regimen for ≥4 weeks prior to enrolment
- Sufficient vision and hearing (with usual aids if required) to complete balance and cognitive assessments
- Able to complete study questionnaires and cognitive tasks (with assistance for reading/writing if required)
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current or past history of head injury
- Use of medications acting on the central nervous system
- Active skin conditions on the forehead or scalp
- Any other major neurological disorder that could independently affect balance or cognition
- Ongoing brain stimulation therapy
- History of migraines
- Sensitive skin, allergies
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Placebo Comparator: Sham Comparator: Sham photobiomodulation
Sham photobiomodulation.
The sham device will follow the same protocol but without active light emission.
|
The sham device will follow the same protocol but without active light emission.
|
|
Experimental: Photobiomodulation
Acute photobiomodulation Twenty-four-minute photobiomodulation stimulation (twelve minutes at 670 nm followed by twelve minutes at 810 nm).
|
Photobiomodulation
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
n-1-back (deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-1-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-1-back (deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-1-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Psychological wellbeing - the Beck Depression Inventory is a 21 questionnaire with questions that range in scoring from 0-3, thus the maximum score is 63 which is the highest depression score possible.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-2-back (deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-2-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-2-back (deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-2-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-1-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-1-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-1-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-1-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-2-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-2-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-2-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-2-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-1-back (post-target)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-1-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-1-back (post-target)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-1-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-1-back (load)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-1-back (load) condition measures working memory performance under the cognitive demand of tracking stimuli 1 trial back.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-1-back (load)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-1-back (load) condition measures working memory performance under the cognitive demand of tracking stimuli 1 trial back.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-2-back (post-load)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-2-back (post-load) condition assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a high cognitive load in the n-2-back task.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-2-back (post-load)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-2-back (post-load) condition assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a high cognitive load in the n-2-back task.
|
1 hour
|
|
Coop-Wonka chart
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Coop-Wonka chart is a six item questionnaire with a 1-5 scoring system for each thus the chart has a maximum score of 30 which indicates the lowest possible psychological Wellbeing.
|
Baseline
|
|
Coop-Wonka chart
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Coop-Wonka chart is a six item questionnaire with a 1-5 scoring system for each thus the chart has a maximum score of 30 which indicates the lowest possible psychological Wellbeing.
|
1 hour
|
|
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
Psychological wellbeing - the Beck Depression Inventory is a 21 questionnaire with questions that range in scoring from 0-3, thus the maximum score is 63 which is the highest depression score possible.
|
1 hour
|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index, is a questionnaire that consists of 19 self-rated questions, grouped into 7 components.
Each component is scored separately, weighted equally on a 0 - 3 scale and the scores of the 7 components are then added to give a global score, which has a range of 0 - 21 with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index, is a questionnaire that consists of 19 self-rated questions, grouped into 7 components.
Each component is scored separately, weighted equally on a 0 - 3 scale and the scores of the 7 components are then added to give a global score, which has a range of 0 - 21 with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
|
1 hour
|
|
State Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The state trait anxiety inventory is a 40 item questionnaire with each question having a 1-4 score system, thus the maximum score is 80 which indicates the highest level of anxiety.
|
Baseline
|
|
State Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The state trait anxiety inventory is a 40 item questionnaire with each question having a 1-4 score system, thus the maximum score is 80 which indicates the highest level of anxiety.
|
1 hour
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Insomnia Severity Index is a brief instrument designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia.
The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item self-report questionnaire yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28.
|
Baseline
|
|
Insomnia Severity Index
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Insomnia Severity Index is a brief instrument designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia.
The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item self-report questionnaire yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28.
|
1 hour
|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions.
Respondents are asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3) with a maximum score of 24.
|
Baseline
|
|
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions.
Respondents are asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3) with a maximum score of 24.
|
1 hour
|
|
Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess the frequency of memory lapses in daily life.
It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting the extent of everyday memory difficulties.
|
Baseline
|
|
Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess the frequency of memory lapses in daily life.
It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting the extent of everyday memory difficulties.
|
1 hour
|
|
Falls Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Falls Efficacy Scale is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess confidence in performing daily activities without falling.
It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting fear of falling and perceived fall-related self-efficacy.
|
Baseline
|
|
Falls Efficacy
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The Falls Efficacy Scale is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess confidence in performing daily activities without falling.
It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting fear of falling and perceived fall-related self-efficacy.
|
1 hour
|
|
Anterior-posterior balance
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The maximum anterior-posterior displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
|
Baseline
|
|
Anterior-posterior balance
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The maximum anterior-posterior displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
|
1 hour
|
|
Medio-lateral balance
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The maximum medio-lateral displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
|
Baseline
|
|
Medio-lateral balance
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The maximum medio-lateral displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
|
1 hour
|
|
n-2-back (post-target)
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The n-2-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
Baseline
|
|
n-2-back (post-target)
Time Frame: 1 hour
|
The n-2-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
|
1 hour
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Estimated)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- PMB Ataxia pilot feasibility s
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ataxia
-
Cadent TherapeuticsWithdrawnSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 10 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 8 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 17 | ARCA1 - Autosomal Recessive...United States
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisCompletedSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia, Autosomal Recessive 3 | Episodic Ataxia, Type 7France
-
Haute Ecole de Santé VaudNot yet recruitingAtaxia | Ataxia, Spinocerebellar | Ataxia, Cerebellar | Ataxia - Other | Ataxia, Motor | Ataxias, Hereditary | Ataxia, Gait
-
Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.CompletedSpinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype Type 8 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Genotype...United States
-
Biohaven Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Active, not recruitingSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxias | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 10 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 8United States, China
-
Teachers College, Columbia UniversityActive, not recruitingSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 7United States
-
University of ChicagoPfizer; Biogen; APDM Wearable TechnologiesCompletedSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Friedreich Ataxia | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6United States
-
University of FloridaUniversity of California, Los Angeles; National Ataxia FoundationRecruitingSpinocerebellar Ataxia Type 3 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 1 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2 | Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 6United States
-
University Health Network, TorontoRecruiting
-
IRCCS Eugenio MedeaRecruiting
Clinical Trials on Sham photobiomodulation
-
University of Nove de JulhoNot yet recruiting
-
University of Nove de JulhoNot yet recruiting
-
University of Nove de JulhoNot yet recruiting
-
University of Nove de JulhoUnknownSoft Tissue Injuries
-
University of Nove de JulhoRecruiting
-
Universidade Federal de Sao CarlosThe São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP)Recruiting
-
Vita CareTegos S.A.CompletedOsteoarthritis | Osteoarthritis Hand | Osteoarthritis Finger | Osteoarthritis Both HandsBrazil
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruitingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder | Cognitive Deficit | Wellness | Attention Difficulties | Attention DeficitUnited States
-
University of Texas at AustinRecruitingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderUnited States
-
Qilu Hospital of Shandong UniversityNot yet recruitingAttention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)