Can Acute Photobiomodulation Improve Balance and Cognition in Individuals With Ataxia: a Pilot Feasibility Placebo Randomized Controlled Trial.

December 8, 2025 updated by: Jonathan Sinclair, University of Central Lancashire

Cerebellar ataxias cause progressive impairments in balance, gait coordination, motor timing, and cognitive functions such as attention and executive control (Buckner, 2013; Salmi et al., 2010; Timmann & Daum, 2007). These symptoms substantially reduce independence and quality of life, and current treatments remain limited. There is an urgent need for safe, low-burden interventions that can support everyday functioning and potentially enhance compensatory neural processes.

Transcranial photobiomodulation (tPBM) uses red and near-infrared light (600-1100 nm) to modulate mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase, increasing ATP production, reducing oxidative stress, and improving cerebral blood flow (Hamblin, 2016; Salehpour et al., 2019). Several studies show that tPBM can acutely improve cognitive performance and motor control in both healthy adults and clinical groups (Barrett & Gonzalez-Lima, 2013; Chan et al., 2019; Henderson & Morries, 2017). A growing neurobiological literature suggests that light can penetrate posterior cortical areas sufficiently to modulate networks involving cerebellar-cortical loops (Jagdeo et al., 2012).

Importantly for ataxia, preliminary work shows that tPBM may acutely improve balance stability and gait metrics in older adults and patients with neurological conditions (Moro et al., 2022; Shin et al., 2021). In our own laboratory, we have observed immediate improvements in sway range and cognitive control in older adults after a 24-minute tPBM session applied over midline and posterior scalp regions. These medium to large size effects are consistent with enhanced sensorimotor integration and improved control of attention in distracting environments.

Given that individuals with cerebellar ataxia experience both motor incoordination and difficulties in maintaining cognitive stability under distracting conditions, tPBM is a promising non-pharmacological intervention worth preliminary investigation.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-70 years (inclusive)
  • Diagnosis of ataxia
  • Able to walk independently for at least 5 minutes, with or without an assistive device
  • Able to stand safely for balance testing, with or without an assistive device
  • Hemodynamically stable (stable blood pressure and heart rate at rest)
  • On a stable medication regimen for ≥4 weeks prior to enrolment
  • Sufficient vision and hearing (with usual aids if required) to complete balance and cognitive assessments
  • Able to complete study questionnaires and cognitive tasks (with assistance for reading/writing if required)
  • Able and willing to provide written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current or past history of head injury
  • Use of medications acting on the central nervous system
  • Active skin conditions on the forehead or scalp
  • Any other major neurological disorder that could independently affect balance or cognition
  • Ongoing brain stimulation therapy
  • History of migraines
  • Sensitive skin, allergies

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: Sham Comparator: Sham photobiomodulation
Sham photobiomodulation. The sham device will follow the same protocol but without active light emission.
The sham device will follow the same protocol but without active light emission.
Experimental: Photobiomodulation
Acute photobiomodulation Twenty-four-minute photobiomodulation stimulation (twelve minutes at 670 nm followed by twelve minutes at 810 nm).
Photobiomodulation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
n-1-back (deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-1-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-1 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-1-back (deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-1-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-1 trials earlier.
1 hour

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline
Psychological wellbeing - the Beck Depression Inventory is a 21 questionnaire with questions that range in scoring from 0-3, thus the maximum score is 63 which is the highest depression score possible.
Baseline
n-2-back (deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-2-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-2 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-2-back (deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-2-back (deviation) task is a working memory test where participants respond when the current stimulus differs from the one presented n-2 trials earlier.
1 hour
n-1-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-1-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-1-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-1-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
1 hour
n-2-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-2-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-2-back (post-deviation)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-2-back (post-deviation) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a deviation from the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
1 hour
n-1-back (post-target)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-1-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-1-back (post-target)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-1-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-1 trials earlier.
1 hour
n-1-back (load)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-1-back (load) condition measures working memory performance under the cognitive demand of tracking stimuli 1 trial back.
Baseline
n-1-back (load)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-1-back (load) condition measures working memory performance under the cognitive demand of tracking stimuli 1 trial back.
1 hour
n-2-back (post-load)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-2-back (post-load) condition assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a high cognitive load in the n-2-back task.
Baseline
n-2-back (post-load)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-2-back (post-load) condition assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a high cognitive load in the n-2-back task.
1 hour
Coop-Wonka chart
Time Frame: Baseline
The Coop-Wonka chart is a six item questionnaire with a 1-5 scoring system for each thus the chart has a maximum score of 30 which indicates the lowest possible psychological Wellbeing.
Baseline
Coop-Wonka chart
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Coop-Wonka chart is a six item questionnaire with a 1-5 scoring system for each thus the chart has a maximum score of 30 which indicates the lowest possible psychological Wellbeing.
1 hour
Beck Depression Inventory
Time Frame: 1 hour
Psychological wellbeing - the Beck Depression Inventory is a 21 questionnaire with questions that range in scoring from 0-3, thus the maximum score is 63 which is the highest depression score possible.
1 hour
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: Baseline
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index, is a questionnaire that consists of 19 self-rated questions, grouped into 7 components. Each component is scored separately, weighted equally on a 0 - 3 scale and the scores of the 7 components are then added to give a global score, which has a range of 0 - 21 with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
Baseline
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality index, is a questionnaire that consists of 19 self-rated questions, grouped into 7 components. Each component is scored separately, weighted equally on a 0 - 3 scale and the scores of the 7 components are then added to give a global score, which has a range of 0 - 21 with higher scores indicating worse sleep quality.
1 hour
State Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: Baseline
The state trait anxiety inventory is a 40 item questionnaire with each question having a 1-4 score system, thus the maximum score is 80 which indicates the highest level of anxiety.
Baseline
State Trait Anxiety Inventory
Time Frame: 1 hour
The state trait anxiety inventory is a 40 item questionnaire with each question having a 1-4 score system, thus the maximum score is 80 which indicates the highest level of anxiety.
1 hour
Insomnia Severity Index
Time Frame: Baseline
The Insomnia Severity Index is a brief instrument designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item self-report questionnaire yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28.
Baseline
Insomnia Severity Index
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Insomnia Severity Index is a brief instrument designed to assess the severity of both nighttime and daytime components of insomnia. The Insomnia Severity Index is a 7-item self-report questionnaire yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 28.
1 hour
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Respondents are asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3) with a maximum score of 24.
Baseline
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is a self-administered questionnaire with 8 questions. Respondents are asked to rate, on a 4-point scale (0-3) with a maximum score of 24.
1 hour
Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
The Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess the frequency of memory lapses in daily life. It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting the extent of everyday memory difficulties.
Baseline
Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Everyday Memory Errors Questionnaire is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess the frequency of memory lapses in daily life. It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting the extent of everyday memory difficulties.
1 hour
Falls Efficacy
Time Frame: Baseline
The Falls Efficacy Scale is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess confidence in performing daily activities without falling. It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting fear of falling and perceived fall-related self-efficacy.
Baseline
Falls Efficacy
Time Frame: 1 hour
The Falls Efficacy Scale is a brief self-report instrument designed to assess confidence in performing daily activities without falling. It consists of multiple items that yield a total score reflecting fear of falling and perceived fall-related self-efficacy.
1 hour
Anterior-posterior balance
Time Frame: Baseline
The maximum anterior-posterior displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
Baseline
Anterior-posterior balance
Time Frame: 1 hour
The maximum anterior-posterior displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
1 hour
Medio-lateral balance
Time Frame: Baseline
The maximum medio-lateral displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
Baseline
Medio-lateral balance
Time Frame: 1 hour
The maximum medio-lateral displacement of the centre of pressure during a two-minute balance task.
1 hour
n-2-back (post-target)
Time Frame: Baseline
The n-2-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
Baseline
n-2-back (post-target)
Time Frame: 1 hour
The n-2-back (post-target) task assesses working memory performance on the trial immediately following a target that matched the stimulus presented n-2 trials earlier.
1 hour

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 10, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 8, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 8, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ataxia

Clinical Trials on Sham photobiomodulation

Subscribe