A Model for Continuous Care of Fragile Patients (AFTER)

December 9, 2025 updated by: Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra

Un Modello di Presa in Carico Continua Del Paziente Fragile

This observational study aims to monitor functional status and identify potential declines in the functioning of medically fragile patients with neurological and/or orthopedic conditions, representing an added value for ensuring appropriate patient management. This approach improves system efficiency and supports a proactive strategy that promotes the appropriate use of resources.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a prospective, observational, non-profit study.

Primary Objective:

To compare functional and cognitive test results at discharge from "La Residenza" rehabilitation center (Rodello - CN- Italy) with remote assessments at patients' homes, demonstrating that Timed Up and Go (TUG) and GPCog tests, validated in-person, can be reliably administered via telemedicine.

Secondary Objectives:

To monitor motor and cognitive function remotely at 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge, assessing clinical course and disease progression, and evaluating patient condition as stable, improved, or deteriorated.

Study Timeline and Sample Size:

Recruitment is expected from September 2025 to March 2026, with last follow-up in March 2027 and an additional 6 months for data analysis and publication. A total of 100 patients (50 orthopedic, 50 neurological) will be enrolled, accounting for a 25% expected loss, based on power calculations for paired t-tests comparing in-person and remote assessments.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Michele Dotta, Dr.
  • Phone Number: +39.0172.1408670
  • Email: mdotta@aslcn2.it

Study Locations

    • CN
      • Verduno, CN, Italy, 12060
        • Azienda Sanitaria Locale CN2 Alba-Bra, Ospedale Michele e Pietro Ferrero

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Medically fragile patients with various neurological or orthopedic conditions will be recruited from Casa di Cura "La Residenza" in Rodello (CN - Italy) for intensive rehabilitation. Patients will come from the Neurology and Orthopedics Units of Michele e Pietro Ferrero Hospital in Verduno (CN - Italy) - ASL CN2 .

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult medically fragile patients with one of the following neurological conditions: mild-to-moderate stroke (Rankin ≤ 3), Multiple Sclerosis (EDSS ≤ 6.5), Parkinson's disease or parkinsonisms, neuromuscular diseases; or orthopedic conditions: femur, pelvis, or humerus fracture.
  • Able to walk independently, with or without assistive devices.
  • Adequate cognitive function (MMSE ≥ 24).
  • Patient or caregiver owns and can use a mobile device with internet/data connection.
  • Presence of a cognitively capable, cooperative caregiver willing to participate in the study.

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with severe neurological or orthopedic conditions who cannot walk independently, even with assistive devices.
  • Patients with moderate or severe cognitive impairment (MMSE < 24).
  • Patients with Barthel Index > 60.
  • Patients or caregivers unable to use a mobile device or without internet/data connection.
  • Patients without a cooperative, cognitively capable caregiver.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Medically Fragile Patients with Neurological or Orthopedic Conditions
This cohort includes medically fragile adult patients with mild-to-moderate neurological or orthopedic conditions who are able to ambulate independently with or without assistive devices. Eligible neurological conditions include mild-to-moderate stroke (mRS ≤ 3), Multiple Sclerosis (EDSS ≤ 6.5), Parkinson's disease or parkinsonisms, and neuromuscular diseases. Eligible orthopedic conditions include femur, pelvis, or humerus fractures. Participants must have adequate cognitive function (MMSE ≥ 24) and the presence of a cognitively capable caregiver.
This intervention provides structured functional monitoring of medically fragile patients with neurological and/or orthopedic conditions using telemedicine. Patients undergo MMSE, Rankin Scale, Barthel Index, TUG, GPCog, and SF-36 assessments at discharge and during follow-up at 3, 6, and 12 months. Patient and caregiver satisfaction with remote monitoring is also evaluated. All remote assessments are performed via the TESI eViSus BioCare® system on mobile devices, allowing early detection of functional decline and supporting proactive patient management.
Other Names:
  • Remote Functional Assessment Protocol
  • Telemedicine Follow-Up Monitoring

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Concordance Between In-Person and Telemedicine Assessments of Functional and Cognitive Performance
Time Frame: 5-10 days after discharge
Percentage of patients for whom the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test differs by less than 3.5 seconds and the GPCog test differs by less than 3 points between in-person and telemedicine assessments.
5-10 days after discharge

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Timed Up and Go (TUG) Test Performance
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge

The Timed Up and Go (TUG) test assesses functional mobility by measuring the time it takes (in seconds) for a participant to stand up from a chair, walk 3 meters, turn, walk back, and sit down. Lower times indicate better functional mobility.

Unit of Measure: Seconds (s)

3, 6, and 12 months after discharge
General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCog) Score
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge

General Practitioner Assessment of Cognition (GPCog), total score range 0-9. Higher scores indicate better cognitive functioning.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-9)

3, 6, and 12 months after discharge
Modified Rankin Scale (mRS)
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months after discharge

Modified Rankin Scale score assessing global disability. Range 0-6, where 0 = no symptoms and 6 = death. Higher scores indicate worse disability.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-6)

Baseline and 12 months after discharge
Barthel Index for Activities of Daily Living
Time Frame: Baseline and 12 months after discharge

Barthel Index score assessing independence in activities of daily living. Range 0-100. Higher scores indicate greater independence.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-100)

Baseline and 12 months after discharge
SF-36 Composite Scores (Physical and Mental Component Summaries)
Time Frame: At discharge and 12 months after discharge

Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey assessing quality of life across multiple domains. Scores range 0-100 for each domain. Higher scores indicate better perceived health status.

Unit of Measure: Score on a scale (0-100)

At discharge and 12 months after discharge
Patient Satisfaction With Remote Monitoring
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge

Patient satisfaction assessed using a validated satisfaction questionnaire (e.g., Likert scale 1-5). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Unit of Measure: Score on a Likert scale (1-5)

3, 6, and 12 months after discharge
Caregiver Satisfaction With Remote Monitoring
Time Frame: 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge

Caregiver satisfaction assessed using a validated satisfaction questionnaire (e.g., Likert scale 1-5). Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction.

Unit of Measure: Score on a Likert scale (1-5)

3, 6, and 12 months after discharge

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 28, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 23, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 9, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neurological Disorders

Clinical Trials on Telemedicine-Based Functional Monitoring

Subscribe