Evaluation of Head-Mounted Spatial Computing and Three-Dimensional (3D) Visualization in Ocular Microsurgery: A Safety and Workflow Study

May 28, 2026 updated by: Tommy Korn, MD, Sharp HealthCare

Evaluation of Head-Mounted Spatial Computing and Three-Dimensional (3D) Visualization in Ocular Microsurgery: A Feasibility and Safety Study

The purpose of this research is to evaluate the use of the research study device, the Apple Vision Pro head-mounted spatial computing display, with the Zeiss Artevo 850 digital microscope system, for the visualization during cataract and anterior segment surgery. Specifically, researchers will assess how the study device affects surgical staff experience and workflow and monitor for patient safety and intraoperative complications associated with the use of the device.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Surgeons and operating room staff will be asked to complete a survey regarding workflow, setup, and communication immediately after the procedure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • San Diego, California, United States, 91914
        • Sharp Otay Lakes Surgery Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18 years or older
  • Scheduled to undergo elective anterior segment eye surgery, including: cataract surgery, pterygium excision, corneal epithelial polishing
  • Able and willing to provide informed consent prior to participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Complex ocular pathology that could interfere with surgical visualization or increase procedural risk, including but not limited to:
  • Lens zonular instability or phacodonesis
  • Prior vitreoretinal surgery (e.g., vitrectomy, scleral buckle, glaucoma drainage device) in the operative eye
  • Significant corneal scarring, opacity, or edema
  • Active ocular surface inflammation or infection
  • Cognitive impairment or language barriers that prevent the patient from understanding and signing informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spatial computing visualization of cataract and anterior segment eye surgery
Participants undergo standard-of-care cataract or anterior segment ocular surgery with adjunctive use of head-mounted spatial computing visualization. There is no comparison group.
Head-mounted spatial computing display used by the surgeon to view the real-time video output from the Zeiss Artevo digital surgical microscope. The Apple Vision Pro functions solely as an alternative visualization interface and does not acquire images, alter microscope function, modify surgical technique, or affect patient care.
FDA-cleared digital ophthalmic surgical microscope used as standard of care to visualize the operative eye during cataract and anterior segment surgery. The microscope provides the primary intraoperative imaging source for all cases, regardless of visualization display method.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Intraoperative safety during head-mounted spatial computing visualization
Time Frame: Perioperative
Safety will be assessed by the proportion of surgical cases completed using head-mounted spatial computing visualization without conversion to standard microscope visualization due to device-related issues, and by the occurrence of intraoperative complications potentially related to visualization, including posterior capsule rupture, vitreous loss, corneal or scleral injury, or other unplanned intraoperative events.
Perioperative

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Surgeon workload during ocular surgery
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery
Surgeon workload measured using the National Aeronautics and Space Administration Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire completed by the operating surgeon.
Immediately after surgery
Surgeon-reported visualization quality and ergonomics
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery
Surgeon-reported assessment of visualization clarity, comfort, ergonomic strain, and overall usability using a post-procedure survey.
Immediately after surgery
Operating room staff workflow and usability
Time Frame: Immediately after surgery
Operating room staff perception of workflow, communication, setup efficiency, and usability assessed using a post-procedure survey.
Immediately after surgery
Operative time and setup efficiency
Time Frame: Perioperative
Total operative time and setup duration recorded from the electronic medical record and intraoperative documentation.
Perioperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Tommy Korn, MD, Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group and Sharp HealthCare

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 11, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 19, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 9, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 22, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2026

Last Verified

May 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Spatial Ocular Microsurgery

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

IPD will not be shared to protect patient confidentiality. Only aggregated, de-identified data will be published in scientific reports on visualization performance, workflow, and surgeon and operating room staff feedback.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cataract

Clinical Trials on Apple Vision Pro (Head-Mounted Spatial Computing Display)

Subscribe