Multiple Sclerosis Versus Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

December 12, 2025 updated by: Hussein Abd Elrahim Hussein Mohamed, Assiut University

Comparative Study Between Multiple Sclerosis Versus Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Patients in Assiut Hospitals Clinical and Laboratory Study

The aim of this work is to do a detailed comparison between multiple sclerosis and Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder due to delicate similarities between both diseases and wide rang of management and follow up of the patients

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

100

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients attending toassuit hospitals

Description

Inclusion Criteria:1- Both sex 2- Aged between 18 and 50 years. All included patients were in a clinically stable phase and had not experienced a relapse within at least three months before blood sampling. 3- All patients diagnosed as MS patients either naive or on disease modifying therapies according to The new diagnostic criteria MacDonalds 2024 4- DMT-naïve NMOSD patients: Diagnosed with MS based on the 2017 McDonald Criteria (Thompson et al., 2018)

5- An informed consent will be obtained from all the patients; the study will be approved by ethical committee in faculty of Medicine Assiut University

-

1_ Presence of other disorder that mimic MS or NMOSD 3_ Patients failed to commit to the follow up visits and regular MRI scans 4_ Patients refused to sign the written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1_ Presence of other disorder that mimic MS or NMOSD 3_ Patients failed to commit to the follow up visits and regular MRI scans 4_ Patients refused to sign the written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein levels
Time Frame: Baseline
Measurement of serum concentrations of Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein at baseline using a validated immunoassay (e.g., single-molecule array [Simoa] assay). difference in serum Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein levels between treatment-naïve NMOSD and treatment-naïve MS patientsexpressed in picograms per milliliter (pg/mL).
Baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Correlation between serum biomarkers (sGFAP and sNfL) and lesion burden on MRI.
Time Frame: Baseline
Correlation (Pearson or Spearman) between biomarker levels and total T2 lesion count at baseline MRI.
Baseline
Correlation between serum biomarkers (sGFAP and sNfL) and Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).
Time Frame: Baseline
Correlation analysis (Pearson or Spearman depending on distribution) between baseline serum concentrations of sGFAP/sNfL and baseline EDSS scores.
Baseline
Association between serum biomarkers and optic nerve involvement (length and presence of LETM).
Time Frame: Baseline
Correlation between sGFAP/sNfL levels and MRI-measured optic nerve lesion length, including presence of longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM).
Baseline
Diagnostic performance of sGFAP and combined sGFAP + sNfL in differentiating NMOSD from MS.
Time Frame: Baseline

Assessment of diagnostic accuracy using Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for:

  1. sGFAP alone
  2. Combined biomarker model (sGFAP + sNfL)
Baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 22, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

Subscribe