Efficacy and Safety Study of Satralizumab (SA237) as Add-on Therapy to Treat Participants With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

March 23, 2023 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Multicenter, Randomized, Addition to Baseline Treatment, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Satralizumab (SA237) in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) and NMO Spectrum Disorder (NMOSD)

The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety, pharmacodynamic, pharmacokinetic, and immunogenic profiles of satralizumab, compared with placebo, in addition to baseline immunosuppressive treatment in participants with NMO and NMOSD.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

85

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Strasbourg, France, 67091
        • Hopital de Hautepierre CHRU de Strasbourg
      • Berlin, Germany, 10117
        • NeuroCure Clinical Research Center (NCRC)
      • Bochum, Germany, 44791
        • St. Josef-Hospital, Klinik für Neurologie
      • Düsseldorf, Germany, 40225
        • Heinrich-Heine Universitätsklinik Düsseldorf
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1204
        • Jahn Ferenc Dél-Pesti Kórház
    • Lazio
      • Roma, Lazio, Italy, 189
        • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea-Universitr di Roma La Sapien
    • Lombardia
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20132
        • Ospedale San Raffaele
    • Sicilia
      • Catania, Sicilia, Italy, 95123
        • PO G.Rodolico, AOU Policlinico-Vittorio Emanuele Catania
      • Cefalu, Sicilia, Italy, 90015
        • Fond. Ist. S. Raffaele - giglio
      • Bunkyo-ku, Japan, 113-8431
        • Juntendo University Hospital; Neurology
      • Fukuoka, Japan, 812-8582
        • Kyushu University Hospital; Neurology
      • Fukushima, Japan, 960-1295
        • Fukushima Medical University Hospital; Neurology
      • Kagoshima, Japan, 890-8520
        • Kagoshima University Medical And Dental Hospital; Neurology and Geriatorics
      • Niigata, Japan, 951-8520
        • Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital; Neurology
      • Osaka, Japan, 589-8511
        • Kindai University Hospital; Neurology
      • Sendai, Japan, 980-8574
        • Tohoku University Hospital; Neurology
      • Shinjuku-ku, Japan, 162-8666
        • Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital; Neurology
      • Suita, Japan, 565-0871
        • Osaka University Hospital; Neurology
      • Tokyo, Japan, 187-8551
        • National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-123
        • NZOZ Wielospecjalistyczna Poradnia Lekarska Synapsis
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-571
        • M.A. - LEK A. M. Maciejowscy SC. Centrum Terapii SM
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-684
        • Centrum Medyczne Dendryt
      • Lublin, Poland, 20-954
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Szpital Kliniczny nr 4 w Lublinie
      • Pozna?, Poland, 60-355
        • Szpital Kliniczny im. H.Swiecickiego UM w Poznaniu
      • Warsaw, Poland
        • Instytut Psychiatrii i Neurologii
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-097
        • Samodzielny Publiczny Centralny Szpital Klinicznyi
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08036
        • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos; Servicio de Nefrologia
      • Kwei Shen, Taiwan, 33305
        • Chang Gung Medical Foundation - LinKou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital - Neurology
      • Taichung, Taiwan, 40447
        • China Medical University Hospital; Neurology - Taichung
      • Tainan, Taiwan, 704
        • National Cheng Kung University Hospital; Neurology
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 11217
        • Taipei Veterans General Hospital-Neurology
      • Taipei, Taiwan, 100
        • National Taiwan University Hospital; Neurology
    • Kharkiv Governorate
      • Kharkiv, Kharkiv Governorate, Ukraine, 61000
        • Kharkivska miska dytiacha likarnia # 5
    • Tavria Okruha
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Tavria Okruha, Ukraine, 49100
        • KZ "Dnipropetrovska oblasna dytiacha klinichna likarnia" DOR
      • Cardiff, United Kingdom, CF14 4XW
        • University Hospital of Wales; Dept of Neurology
      • Chinnor, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • John Radcliffe Hospital; Neurosciences
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3BG
        • The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery
      • London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital For Children; Neurology
    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • Children's Hospital of Alabama

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

10 years to 72 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients must be diagnosed as having either neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD), defined as the following:

    1. NMO as defined by Wingerchuk et al. 2006 criteria (requires all of the following 3 criteria: I. Optic neuritis, II. Acute myelitis, III. At least two of three supportive criteria: Contiguous spinal cord lesion identified on a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan extending over 3 vertebral segments; Brain MRI not meeting diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis (MS); NMO-IgG seropositive status)
    2. NMOSD as defined by either of the following Wingerchuk 2007 criteria with anti-AQP4 antibody (Ab) seropositive status at screening (i. Idiopathic single or recurrent events of longitudinally extensive myelitis [≥3 vertebral segment spinal cord MRI lesion]; ii. Optic neuritis: recurrent or simultaneous bilateral); For patients aged 12 to 17 years, a minimum of 4 patients should be positive for anti-AQP4Ab status at screening
  2. Clinical evidence of at least 2 documented relapses (including first attack) in the last 2 years prior to screening, at least one of which has occurred in the 12 months prior to screening
  3. EDSS score from 0 to 6.5 inclusive at screening
  4. Age 12 to 74 years, inclusive at the time of informed consent
  5. One of the following baseline treatments must be at stable dose as a monotherapy for 8 weeks prior to baseline: Azathioprine; Mycophenolate mofetil; Oral corticosteroids. For participants aged 12 to 17 years, either of the following baseline treatments for relapse prevention can be allowed: Azathioprine + oral corticosteroids; Mycophenolate mofetil + oral corticosteroids
  6. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent and to comply with the requirements of the protocol

For adolescents who may be enrolled after the end of the double-blind period, the inclusion criterion 2 is as follows (other criteria are same): Clinical evidence of at least 2 documented relapses (including first attack) prior to screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

Exclusion criteria related to previous or concomitant therapy:

  1. Any previous treatment with IL-6 inhibitory therapy (e.g. tocilizumab), alemtuzumab, total body irradiation or bone marrow transplantation at any time
  2. Any previous treatment with anti-CD20, eculizumab, belimumab, interferon, natalizumab, glatiramer acetate, fingolimod, teriflunomide or dimethyl fumarate within 6 months prior to baseline
  3. Any previous treatment with anti-CD4, cladribine or mitoxantrone within 2 years prior to baseline
  4. Treatment with any investigational agent within 3 months prior to baseline

    Exclusions for general safety:

  5. Pregnancy or lactation
  6. For patients of reproductive potential, a positive result from a serum pregnancy test at screening, or not willing to use reliable means of contraception (physical barrier [patient or partner] in conjunction with a spermicidal product, contraceptive pill, patch, injectables, intrauterine device or intrauterine system) during the treatment period and for at least 3 months after the last dose of study drug
  7. Any surgical procedure (except for minor surgeries) within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  8. Evidence of other demyelinating disease or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML)
  9. Evidence of serious uncontrolled concomitant diseases that may preclude patient participation, such as: other nervous system disease, cardiovascular disease, hematologic/hematopoiesis disease, respiratory disease, muscular disease, endocrine disease, renal/urologic disease, digestive system disease, congenital or acquired severe immunodeficiency
  10. Known active infection (excluding fungal infections of nail beds or caries dentium) within 4 weeks prior to baseline
  11. Evidence of chronic active hepatitis B or C
  12. History of drug or alcohol abuse within 1 year prior to baseline
  13. History of diverticulitis that, in the Investigator's opinion, may lead to increased risk of complications such as lower gastrointestinal perforation
  14. Evidence of active tuberculosis (TB; excluding patients receiving chemoprophylaxis for latent TB infection)
  15. Evidence of active interstitial lung disease
  16. Receipt of any live or live attenuated vaccine within 6 weeks prior to baseline
  17. History of malignancy within the last 5 years, including solid tumors, hematologic malignancies and in situ carcinoma (except basal cell and squamous cell carcinomas of the skin, or in situ carcinoma of the cervix uteri that have been completely excised and cured)
  18. History of severe allergic reaction to a biologic agent (e.g. shock, anaphylactic reactions)
  19. Active suicidal ideation within 6 months prior to screening, or history of suicide attempt within 3 years prior to screening
  20. Following laboratory abnormalities at screening*.

    1. White blood cells (WBC) <3.0 x10^3/microliter (μL)
    2. Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <2.0 x10^3/μL
    3. Absolute lymphocyte count <0.5 x10^3/μL
    4. Platelet count <10 x 10^4/μL
    5. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) or alanine aminotranferase (ALT) >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) * If retest is conducted, the last value of retest before randomization must meet study criteria.

For adolescents who may be enrolled after the end of the double-blind period, the annotation in the exclusion criterion 20 is as follows (other criteria are same): * If retest is conducted, the last value of retest before baseline must meet study criteria

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Satralizumab + Baseline Treatment
Participants randomized to this arm for the double-blind period will receive satralizumab in addition to baseline treatment. The double-blind period ends when either the participant has a treated relapse or the total number of protocol-defined relapses confirmed by the Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) reaches 26. In the open-label extension period, the participant will receive (with or without baseline treatment) an SC injection of satralizumab at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and Q4W thereafter, with the last study drug administration on or before 31 December 2021.
Satralizumab will be administered subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and thereafter once every 4 weeks (Q4W).
Other Names:
  • SA237
  • RG6168
  • RO5333787
As specified in the protocol, one of the following drugs at a stable dose is required as monotherapy for baseline treatment during the double-blind period: azathioprine (AZA); mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); or oral corticosteroids (CS). For participants aged 12 to 17 years at the time of informed consent, baseline treatment with AZA or MMF in combination with oral CS is also permitted. Change or termination of baseline treatment is only permitted during the open-label extension period.
Placebo Comparator: Placebo + Baseline Treatment
Participants randomized to this arm for the double-blind period will receive placebo in addition to baseline treatment.The double-blind period ends when either the participant has a treated relapse or the total number of protocol-defined relapses confirmed by the Clinical Endpoint Committee (CEC) reaches 26. In the open-label extension period, the participant will receive (with or without baseline treatment) an SC injection of satralizumab at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and Q4W thereafter, with the last study drug administration on or before 31 December 2021.
Placebo will be administered subcutaneously (SC) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, and thereafter once every 4 weeks (Q4W).
As specified in the protocol, one of the following drugs at a stable dose is required as monotherapy for baseline treatment during the double-blind period: azathioprine (AZA); mycophenolate mofetil (MMF); or oral corticosteroids (CS). For participants aged 12 to 17 years at the time of informed consent, baseline treatment with AZA or MMF in combination with oral CS is also permitted. Change or termination of baseline treatment is only permitted during the open-label extension period.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to First Protocol-Defined Relapse (TFR) in the Double-Blind Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 224
TFR was defined as time from randomization to first occurrence of relapse in the DB period. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) as adjudicated by an independent clinical endpoint committee (CEC). Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onset days that were 30 days of one another, they were counted only as 1 relapse), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
Up to Week 224

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relapse-Free Rate During the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 216
Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological neuromyelitis optica (NMO) or neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (i.e., if 2 relapses had onsets within 30 days of one another, they were counted as 1), and onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
Up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 General Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Mental Health Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Emotional Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Role-Physical Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Social Role Functioning Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Vitality Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Physical Component Summary Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The component scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher score indicates better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The mRS is a 7-point disability scale that assesses the degree of disability in participants with neurological impairment. Possible scores range from 0 (no symptoms at all) up to 6 (death). Higher scores reflect increased disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The EDSS is an ordinal scale with values from 0 points (normal neurological examination) to 10 points (death) increasing in half-point increments once an EDSS of 1.0 has been reached. Higher scores represent increased disability. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in Visual Acuity (Snellen Chart) at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
Visual acuity was measured using Snellen 20-foot wall chart and then converted to logMAR visual acuity scoring. Lower values indicate better visual acuity. Data are reported for right eye (OD) and left eye (OS). A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) During the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 216
The ARR is calculated as the total number of participants with relapses experienced divided by the patient-years at risk. Protocol-defined relapse was occurrence of new or worsening neurological symptoms attributable to neurological NMO or NMOSD. Symptoms had to persist for >24 hours and not be attributable to confounding clinical factors (e.g., fever, infection, injury, change in mood, adverse reactions to medications). New or worsening neurological symptoms that occurred < 31 days following onset of a protocol-defined relapse were considered part of same relapse (2 relapses with onset days in 30 days of one another was counted as 1 relapse), onset date used in analysis was the date of first relapse.
Up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 168
The ZBI is the measurement to assess caregiver burden. The 22 items ask for the strain caregivers perceive. Responses range from 0 (never) to 4 (nearly always). The overall ZBI score ranges from 0 to 88. The higher the total score, the heavier the perceived burden. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 168
Change From Baseline in Short Form Generic Health Survey (SF-36) Mental Component Summary Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The component scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher score indicates better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in SF-36 Bodily Pain Domain Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The SF-36v2 is a multi-purpose, short form health survey with 36 questions. It has 8 domains (vitality, physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, role-physical, role emotional, social role functioning and mental health) of functional health and well-being scores as well as psychometrically based physical and mental health component summary measures and a preference-based health utility index. The domain scores were transformed to a 0-100 scale, where higher scores indicate better quality of life. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Change From Baseline in EuroQoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Index Scores at 24 Week Intervals During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline up to Week 216
The EQ-5D is a participant-answered questionnaire measuring 5 dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression with 3 possible response categories: 1) no problems; 2) some problems; 3) severe problems. The scores from 5 dimensions are used as input to generate EQ-5D index score using scoring algorithm. The EQ-5D index score is scored on a scale of -0.2 to 1. A higher score reflects a better health state. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement.
Baseline up to Week 216
Serum Satralizumab Concentration During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Serum Soluble IL-6 Receptor (sIL-6R) Concentration During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Serum High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) Concentration During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Serum Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Concentration During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, and every 4 weeks thereafter up to Week 224
Number of Participants With at Least One Adverse Event in the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 224
An adverse event is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with the treatment. An adverse event can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding, for example), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a pharmaceutical product, whether or not considered related to the pharmaceutical product. Pre-existing conditions which worsen during a study are also considered as adverse events.
Up to Week 224
Number of Participants With at Least One Serious Adverse Event in the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 224
A serious adverse event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that, at any dose, results in death, is life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or is medically significant or requires intervention to prevent one or other of the outcomes listed above.
Up to Week 224
Number of Participants With Non-Serious Adverse Events of Special Interest in the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 224
Non-serious adverse events of special interest for this study included: 1) cases of an elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or aspartate aminotransferase (AST) in combination with either an elevated bilirubin or clinical jaundice, 2) suspected transmission of an infectious agent by the study treatment.
Up to Week 224
Number of Participants With Selected Adverse Events in the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to Week 224
Selected adverse events for this study included: 1) non-serious infections that required treatments with intravenous (IV) antibiotic, antifungal, antiviral, 2) opportunistic infections that required treatments with oral antibiotics, antifungals, or antivirals, 3) injection-related reactions (IRRs; an AE which occured within 24 hours after study treatment injection except where the event was not considered an allergic reaction), and 4) anaphylaxis (an acute allergic/hypersensitivity reaction).
Up to Week 224
Number of Participants With Suicidal Behaviors and Ideations Collected by Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale in the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline and Post-Baseline (up to Week 224)
The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) is an assessment tool to evaluate suicidal ideation and behavior. Categories have binary responses (yes/no) and include: Wish to be Dead; Non-specific Active Suicidal Thoughts; Active Suicidal Ideation with Any Methods (Not Plan) without Intent to Act; Active Suicidal Ideation with Some Intent to Act, without Specific Plan; Active Suicidal Ideation with Specific Plan and Intent, Preparatory Acts and Behavior; Aborted Attempt; Interrupted Attempt; Actual Attempt (non-fatal); Completed Suicide. Suicidal ideation or behavior is indicated by a "yes" answer to any of the listed categories. A score of 0 is assigned if no suicide risk is present. A score of 1 or higher indicates suicidal ideation or behavior.
Baseline and Post-Baseline (up to Week 224)
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies to Satralizumab in the DB Period
Time Frame: Up to approximately Week 224
Reported here is the percentage of participants with at least one positive anti-drug antibody measurement during the DB period.
Up to approximately Week 224
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Score for Pain During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The VAS is a subjective measure of pain consisting of a 100 mm line with two endpoints representing 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "pain as bad as it could be". Participants rated their pain by placing a mark on the line corresponding to their current level of pain. The distance along the line from the "no pain" marker was measured with a ruler giving a pain score out of 100. A higher score indicated more pain and lower scores reflected a better health state. A negative change from baseline indicates an improvement. ANCOVA was used for analysis to report the adjusted mean and standard error (SE).
Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline at Week 24 in the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT) Fatigue Score During the DB Period
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
The FACIT Fatigue scale is a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function over the past 7 days. As each of the 13 items of the scale ranges from 0-4, the range of possible scores was computed using FACIT scoring algorithm as 0-52, where 0 is the worst possible score and 52 the best which indicated less fatigue. A positive change from baseline indicates an improvement. ANCOVA was used for analysis to report the adjusted mean and SE.
Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies to Satralizumab Overall S237 Period
Time Frame: Up to approximately Week 368
Reported here is the percentage of participants with at least one positive anti-drug antibody measurement during Overall S237 period.
Up to approximately Week 368

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 20, 2014

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 6, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

December 23, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 6, 2014

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 6, 2014

First Posted (Estimate)

January 7, 2014

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 23, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO)

Clinical Trials on Satralizumab

3
Subscribe