To Evaluate Early (2-Week) vs. Standard (4-Week) Metal Stent Removal Following Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided WON Drainage (STEP1)

January 27, 2026 updated by: Mohan Ramchandani, Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India

A Randomized Controlled Trial To Evaluate Early (2-Week) vs. Standard (4-Week) Metal Stent Removal Following Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided WON Drainage.

In adults with walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) undergoing endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal necrosectomy, does early removal of the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) (at 2 weeks or immediately after the last necrosectomy) with placement of a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPT), compared to delayed LAMS removal at 4 weeks without a DPT, result in a lower rate of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC) recurrence or need for reintervention over 12 months.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Management of walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) following acute pancreatitis has been transformed by the use of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided transluminal drainage with a lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS). The LAMS provides a large-caliber conduit for drainage and allows for direct endoscopic necrosectomy, leading to faster resolution of collections and reduced need for surgical intervention. However, the optimal timing for LAMS removal remains uncertain.

Prolonged retention of LAMS has been associated with several adverse events, including delayed bleeding due to vascular erosion, buried-stent syndrome, stent migration, and tissue hyperplasia at the tract site. Conversely, premature removal of the stent may lead to incomplete drainage, persistent or recurrent pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs), and the need for repeat interventions. Therefore, determining the ideal balance between minimizing stent-related complications and preventing recurrence is a key clinical challenge.

Early removal of the LAMS-either 2 weeks after insertion or immediately after the last necrosectomy session-may reduce the risk of delayed bleeding and other metal stent-related complications. However, to maintain tract patency and allow residual drainage, placement of a prophylactic double-pigtail plastic stent (DPT) at the time of LAMS removal has been proposed. The DPT provides a smaller but stable drainage channel that may prevent premature tract closure and recurrence of fluid collections.

This randomized controlled trial aims to rigorously test whether early LAMS removal combined with DPT placement offers better long-term outcomes compared to standard 4-week LAMS removal without DPT. The results are expected to provide evidence-based guidance on optimizing stent management in patients with WON undergoing endoscopic necrosectomy, balancing efficacy with safety.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

408

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Deepak L JHA, DrNB( medical gastroenterology
  • Phone Number: 91-9967807858
  • Email: drd55pakjha@gmail.com

Study Contact Backup

  • Name: Nitin G Jagtap, DNB (Medical Gastroenterology)
  • Phone Number: +91-82859523
  • Email: docnits13@gmail.com

Study Locations

    • Telangana
      • Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 500082
        • Recruiting
        • Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
          • Nitin G Jagtap, Medical Gastroenterology)
          • Phone Number: +91 82859523
          • Email: docnits13@gmail.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Patients with walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON) undergoing endoscopic ultrasound-guided drainage with lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS)
  • Radiological resolution of the pancreatic fluid collection ≥70% at 2 weeks after index endoscopic drainage, assessed on cross-sectional imaging (CT or MRI)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of chronic pancreatitis
  • Pancreatic malignancy (suspected or confirmed)
  • Incomplete endoscopic necrosectomy or persistent large necrotic debris on imaging at 2 weeks after drainage
  • Occurrence of major procedure-related adverse events within the first 2 weeks, including:
  • Clinically significant bleeding
  • Infection requiring additional intervention
  • Stent migration
  • Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Early Stent Replacement Arm (2-Week LAMS Removal + DPT Placement)
Participants in this arm will undergo early removal of the lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) at 2 weeks after initial endoscopic drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Following LAMS removal, a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPT) will be placed across the transmural tract to maintain drainage and reduce the risk of recurrent pancreatic fluid collection (PFC). Patients will undergo follow-up imaging at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess recurrence, complications, and need for reintervention.
In the early stent removal arm, LAMS will be removed at 2 weeks followed by placement of a double-pigtail plastic stent (DPT).
Other Names:
  • EARLY
Active Comparator: Standard Stent Replacement Arm (4-Week LAMS Removal without DPT)
Participants in this arm will undergo standard removal of the LAMS at 4 weeks after initial endoscopic drainage for walled-off pancreatic necrosis (WON). Patients will be followed at 3, 6, and 12 months to assess recurrence of pancreatic fluid collection (PFC), complications, and reintervention rates.
In the standard arm, LAMS will be removed at 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)
Time Frame: 12 months after initial drainage procedure
Recurrence is defined as the redevelopment of a symptomatic pancreatic fluid collection confirmed on imaging (CT or MRI) after initial resolution following endoscopic drainage and lumen-apposing metal stent (LAMS) removal. The recurrence rate will be compared between the early LAMS removal + double-pigtail plastic stent (DPT) group and the standard 4-week LAMS removal group.
12 months after initial drainage procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recurrence of Pancreatic Fluid Collection at 3 and 6 Months
Time Frame: 3 months and 6 months after the initial drainage procedure
Incidence of PFC recurrence confirmed by imaging (CT/MRI) or symptomatic relapse within 3 and 6 months of the index drainage procedure. Comparison will be made between the early LAMS removal + DPT group and the standard 4-week LAMS removal group.
3 months and 6 months after the initial drainage procedure
Stent-Related Adverse Events
Time Frame: Up to 12 months post-procedure
Incidence of complications directly related to LAMS or DPT placement, including migration, occlusion, infection, or buried stent syndrome.
Up to 12 months post-procedure
Need for Reinterventions
Time Frame: Within 12 months after stent removal
Proportion of patients requiring additional interventions for pancreatic collection management, such as repeat endoscopic drainage, necrosectomy, percutaneous drainage or surgical necrosectomy.
Within 12 months after stent removal

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Deepak L Jha, (Medical Gastroenterology), Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 25, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 13, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2025

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 28, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 27, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • STEP1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because data sharing is not planned for this study.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Walled Off Necrosis

Clinical Trials on Standard LAMS Removal with Double-Pigtail Plastic Stent

Subscribe