A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of BCD-281 in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (MUSCAT)

December 26, 2025 updated by: Biocad

A Double-blind, Randomized Clinical Study of the Efficacy and Safety of BCD-281 in Patients With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy, safety profile, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of BCD-281 and the reference drug in subjects with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The study includes the following periods:

  • Screening (not more than 28 days from the date of signing the ICF).
  • Double-blind period - Week 0-72.
  • Open-label period - Weeks 72-96.
  • Follow-up period - Weeks 96-100. The screening examination is aimed at confirming the eligibility of the subjects for the study. After confirming the eligibility, the subject will be randomized with equal probability into one of two groups (BCD-281 and the reference drug).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

292

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Nizhny Novgorod, Russia
        • Recruiting
        • LLC "Medis"
        • Contact:
          • Sokolova

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Provided written ICF to participate in the study.
  • Male and female subjects aged 18 to 55 years inclusive at the time of signing the ICF.
  • Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis, established in accordance with the McDonald criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (2017 revision).
  • Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.
  • The total EDSS score 0-5.5 inclusive.
  • Documentary evidence of the following at the time of signing the ICF:

    1. at least one relapse within the last12 months, and/or
    2. 2 relapses within the last 24 months, and/or
    3. at least 1 T1 Gd+ lesion detected on brain MRI and 1 relapse within 24 months prior to signing the ICF.
  • Presence of IgG antibodies to the Varicella-Zoster virus.
  • Neurological stability for 30 days prior to signing the ICF.
  • Subject's willingness to discontinue previously prescribed DMTs from the day of the first administration of the IP and throughout the study.
  • The ability of the subject to follow the Protocol procedures, according to the Investigator.
  • Willingness of subjects of both sexes and their sexual partners of childbearing potential to use reliable methods of contraception from the time of signing ICF, throughout the study and for 5 months after the last dose of the drug in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Primary progressive or secondary progressive MS.
  • MS duration of more than 10 years with EDSS score of ≤2.0 at screening.
  • Malignant form of MS.
  • Other medical conditions that can affect the assessment of clinical picture of the MS.
  • Inability to obtain high-quality MRI images and/or the presence of contraindications to MRI and the administration of gadolinium-containing contrast agents.
  • Any comorbidities requiring treatment with systemic glucocorticoids and/or immunosuppressive drugs for the duration of the study, with the exception of MS.
  • History of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy.
  • Any acute or exacerbated chronic infections detected during screening that may have a negative impact on subject's safety during the study therapy.
  • Concomitant diseases and/or conditions that may affect the assessment of the clinical picture of the underlying disease and/or significantly increase the risk of AEs during the study.
  • Known alcohol or drug addiction, or current signs of alcohol/drug addiction.
  • History of severe depression and/or a Beck Depression Inventory score of ≥16 at screening examination.
  • History of a malignant disease within 5 years prior to screening.
  • A diagnosis of HIV infection, hepatitis B or C .
  • Inability to provide the subject with venous access.
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding, pregnancy planning and oocyte donation throughout the study and for 5 months after the last dose of ocrelizumab.
  • A history of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions to humanized and/or murine monoclonal antibodies.
  • A history of using any prohibited medications or treatments defined in the study protocol.
  • Abnormal laboratory blood values, as specified in the study protocol.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BCD-281
Subjects will receive 300 mg (for the first two infusions) and 600 mg via subsequent infusions.
anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody
Active Comparator: Ocrelizumab
Subjects will receive 300 mg (for the first two infusions) and 600 mg via subsequent infusions.
anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of T1 gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions up to Week 24.
Time Frame: up to Week 24
The total number of T1 Gd+ lesions for all participants in the treatment group was calculated as the sum of the individual number of lesions at Weeks 12, 16, 20 and 24.
up to Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized relapse rate (ARR).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
ARR was protocol-defined and calculated as the total number of relapses for all participants in the treatment group divided by the total participant-years of exposure to that treatment.
up to Week 100
Time to first relapse.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects without confirmed relapses.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Total number of T1 Gd+ lesions at Weeks 48, 72, 100.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Total number of new or enlarged T2 lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects without contrast-enhancing lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects without new or enlarged T2 lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Total number of new hypointense T1 lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Change in the volume of hypointense T1 lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Change in the volume of T2 lesions.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Combined unique active (CUA).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
The total number of new T1 Gd+ lesions and new or enlarging T2 lesions, without double counting
up to Week 100
Changes over time in the neurologic deficit according to the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Changes in the neurologic deficit according to EEDSS to measure disability and disease progression (from 0 to 10). An increase in the EDSS score signifies worsening disability.
up to Week 100
Changes over time in Timed 25-Foot (7.62 meters) Walk Test performance.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Changes over time in 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) performance.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Changes over time in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) performance.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Change in quality of life using SF-36 questionnaire (36-Item Short Form Health Survey)
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Change in the quality of life parameters using a SF-36 questionnaire. SF-36 (Short Form-36) questionnaire includes a total of 36 questions. Higher scores (0-100) mean better health.
up to Week 100
Change in quality of life using EQ-5D questionnaire (EuroQol Five Dimensions)
Time Frame: up to Week 100

A positive change in the Index score or a higher score generally means improvement in health.

A negative change in the Index or a lower score means deterioration.

up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects with confirmed disability progression (CDP).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects with confirmed disability worsening (CDW).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
The proportion of subjects with confirmed overall disability worsening.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of patients with adverse reactions
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of patients with serious adverse reactions
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
AUC 168-336.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Area under the drug concentration-time curve for the time interval from the measurable concentration on Day 169 to the measurable concentration on Day 337 (before the fourth administration of the investigational products).
up to Week 100
Cmax.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Maximum observed drug concentration.
up to Week 100
Tmax.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Time to maximum plasma concentration.
up to Week 100
T1/2.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Terminal Elimination Half-life (T1/2) of IP.
up to Week 100
Kel.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
The elimination rate constant.
up to Week 100
Ceoi.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Ctrough.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of IP.
up to Week 100
Pharmacodynamic endpoints.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
PD will be evaluated based on the determination of CD19+ B-cell levels in subjects' blood.
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects with binding antibodies (BAbs).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Proportion of subjects with neutralizing antibodies (NAbs).
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100
Time to BAb/NAb positivity.
Time Frame: up to Week 100
up to Week 100

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 17, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsing-remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)

Clinical Trials on BCD-281

Subscribe