Impact of Emotional Disorders on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Liver Cancer

December 24, 2025 updated by: Wan-Guang Zhang, Tongji Hospital

Impact of Emotional Disorders on Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy in Liver Cancer: A Multicenter, Prospective, Multi-Cohort Study

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.

To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries a poor prognosis, with limited efficacy from current therapies including immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Concurrently, emotional distress (ED) is highly prevalent in cancer patients and is implicated in tumor progression via neuroendocrine-immune axis dysregulation (e.g., HPA axis activation, immunosuppressive TME). Emerging evidence, particularly from lung cancer, suggests ED may adversely impact ICI efficacy. However, its specific role and clinical significance in HCC, especially regarding ICI response, remain poorly understood.

To address this gap, we propose a large-scale, prospective, multicenter, multi-cohort study to systematically evaluate the impact of ED on treatment outcomes in HCC patients receiving immunotherapy.

This multi-cohort study comprises three independent cohorts:

Cohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243).

In the recently published LEAP-012 study, the median progression-free survival (PFS) for advanced HCC receiving first-line transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with immunotherapy and targeted therapy was 14.6 months. Based on an observed median PFS of 14.6 months for the overall population, a hazard ratio (HR) for tumor progression of approximately 1.7 for the ED group, and an estimated ED prevalence of 48.89%, we assumed exponential survival distributions for both groups. The overall survival function was constructed as:

S(t) = 0.4889 × exp(-1.7λ₀t) + 0.5111 × exp(-λ₀t) where λ₀ is the hazard rate for the non-ED group. Solving the key equation S(14.6)=0.5 numerically yields λ₀ ≈ 0.0357 per month. Consequently: Median PFS for the non-ED group = ln(2)/λ₀ ≈ 19.4 months Median PFS for the ED group = 19.4 / 1.7 ≈ 11.2 months With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power (1-β) of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 18 months, analysis using PASS 15 software indicated a required sample size of 194 subjects. Accounting for an estimated 20% dropout rate, a total of 243 participants will be enrolled.

Cohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175).

In the TOPAZ-1 study, the median PFS for advanced biliary tract cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy combined with durvalumab was 12.9 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median PFS is approximately 9.8 months for the ED group and 17.0 months for the non-ED group. Considering the lower incidence of ICC, a longer accrual period is required. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 24 months, and a maximum follow-up of 30 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 140 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 175 participants will be enrolled.

Cohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233).

In early-stage resectable HCC, patients with high-risk recurrence factors often experience early recurrence, with a reported median disease-free survival (DFS) of approximately 21.4 months. Using the same calculation method as for Cohort 1, the estimated median DFS is approximately 16.2 months for the ED group and 28.1 months for the non-ED group. With a two-sided alpha of 0.05, power of 0.8, an accrual period of 12 months, and a maximum follow-up of 24 months, PASS 15 analysis indicated a required sample size of 186 subjects. Accounting for a 20% dropout rate, a total of 233 participants will be enrolled.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

651

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hubei
      • Wuhan, Hubei, China, 430000
        • Recruiting
        • Division of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

This study will enroll adult patients with newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve, unresectable HCC or ICC who are scheduled to receive guideline-recommended first-line immunotherapy-based regimens. Eligible participants must have at least one radiologically measurable lesion per RECIST 1.1 criteria, preserved liver function, and a good performance status. This population is designed to evaluate the impact of baseline emotional distress on immunotherapy outcomes in a representative cohort of patients with primary liver cancer initiating standard-of-care treatment.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 75 years, inclusive, regardless of gender.
  • Presence of at least one radiologically measurable lesion according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 (defined as a lesion with a longest diameter of ≥10 mm on CT scan).
  • Newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
  • Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7.
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1.
  • Absence of severe organic diseases affecting the heart, lungs, brain, or other major organs.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of other malignancies.
  • Recurrent HCC.
  • Prior systemic therapy for HCC.
  • Hepatic decompensation.
  • History of severe psychiatric disorders.
  • Current use of antidepressant or anxiolytic medication.
  • Inability to comprehend or complete the assessment questionnaires.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Advanced unresectable HCC cohort
Cohort 1: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable HCC (n=243)
  • The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to screen for depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients;

    • The PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality index of cancer patients; ③ The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety status of patient caregivers; ④ The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.
Advanced unresectable ICC cohort
Cohort 2: Impact of ED on first-line therapy for advanced, unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) (n=175)
  • The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to screen for depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients;

    • The PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality index of cancer patients; ③ The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety status of patient caregivers; ④ The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.
Resectable high-risk HCC cohort
Cohort 3: Impact of ED on postoperative recurrence in resectable high-risk HCC (n=233)
  • The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to screen for depression and anxiety symptoms in cancer patients;

    • The PSQI was used to assess the sleep quality index of cancer patients; ③ The PHQ-9 rating scale and GAD-7 rating scale were used to evaluate the depression and anxiety status of patient caregivers; ④ The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used to assess the quality of life of cancer patients.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-free survival(PFS)
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until the date of first progress or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.
In the three cohorts, PFS following immunotherapy was compared between primary liver cancer patients with and without emotional disorders.
From date of enrollment until the date of first progress or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 60 months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall survival(OS)
Time Frame: From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.
In the three cohorts, OS following immunotherapy was compared between primary liver cancer patients with and without emotional disorders.
From date of enrollment until the date of death from any cause, assessed up to 96 months.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Emotional Disorder

Clinical Trials on Scale score

Subscribe