Comparison Between Intrathecal Magnesium Sulphate & Dexmedetomidine in DHS

December 24, 2025 updated by: Shehab Fathy Ahmed Osman, Assiut University

Comparative Evaluation of Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Magnesium Sulphate as Adjuvants to 0.5% Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia in Patients Undergoing Dynamic Hip Screw (DHS) Fixation: A Randomized Clinical Study

To compare the efficacy and safety of intrathecal dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in patients undergoing elective DHS fixation, focusing on onset and duration of sensory and motor block, hemodynamic stability, and quality of postoperative analgesia.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Spinal anesthesia is a preferred technique for lower limb orthopedic surgeries due to its rapid onset, reliable sensory and motor blockade, and minimal systemic side effects. Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% is commonly used; however, its duration may be insufficient for prolonged procedures or postoperative analgesia. To enhance and prolong anesthesia and analgesia, various intrathecal adjuvants have been investigated.

Dexmedetomidine, a selective α2-adrenergic agonist, has shown promise in improving the quality and duration of spinal anesthesia by providing prolonged sensory and motor blockade, stable hemodynamics, and enhanced postoperative analgesia. Similarly, magnesium sulphate, an NMDA receptor antagonist, exerts antinociceptive effects by modulating calcium influx in nerve cells, potentially prolonging analgesia without significant motor blockade.

Dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation is a common surgical intervention for intertrochanteric femur fractures, particularly in elderly patients. These procedures demand reliable intraoperative anesthesia and effective postoperative pain control to facilitate early mobilization and reduce complications.

Despite individual studies evaluating these agents, direct comparisons between intrathecal dexmedetomidine and magnesium sulphate as adjuvants to bupivacaine in DHS fixation remain limited. This study aims to compare their efficacy and safety in enhancing spinal anesthesia, thereby optimizing perioperative care in patients undergoing elective DHS fixation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

92

Phase

  • Phase 3

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 18-65 year
  • ASA Physical Status I or II
  • Scheduled for elective DHS fixation under spinal anesthesia
  • Written informed consent provided
  • Patients of both sex are included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Allergy to study drugs
  • Local infection at injection site
  • Neurological or psychiatric illness
  • Coagulopathy
  • Chronic opioid or sedative use

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Group D (Dexmedetomidine)
2.5 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 5 µg dexmedetomidine (0.5 mL), total volume 3 mL
Active Comparator: Group M (Magnesium Sulphate)
2.5 mL 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine + 50 mg magnesium sulphate (0.5 mL), total volume 3 mL

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Highest Dermatome Level of Sensory Block
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
Sensory block level assessed using a pinprick test and recorded as the highest dermatome level with loss of sensation.
24 hours after intervention
Duration of postoperative analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
The outcome is Measured by Vas Score to assess pain intensity. It consists of a numeric version of the visual analogue scale. It is a horizontal line with an eleven point numeric range. It is labeled from zero to ten, with zero being an example of someone with no pain and ten being the worst pain possible. This scale can be administered verbally. Vas score for 24 h will be assessed at 0., 1, 12 and 24 h postoperatively and will be recorded.
24 hours after intervention
Degree of Motor Block
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
Motor block assessed using the Modified Bromage Scale (0-3), where higher scores indicate greater motor block.
24 hours after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Heart Rate
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
Heart rate measured in beats per minute (bpm)
24 hours after intervention
Incidence of Adverse Effects
Time Frame: 24 hours after Intervention
Bradycardia Hypotension Nausea Vomiting Sedation (Assessed By Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS) ) Shivering Respiratory depression Delayed motor block Flushing Warm sensation Headache Pruritus Urinary retention Neurological complications (e.g., transient paresthesia)
24 hours after Intervention
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
Mean arterial pressure measured in mmHg
24 hours after intervention
Oxygen Saturation
Time Frame: 24 hours after intervention
Peripheral oxygen saturation measured by pulse oximetry by percentage
24 hours after intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 19, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Effects of Dexmedetomidine & Magnesium Sulphate on Patients Undergoing DHS

Clinical Trials on Dexmedetomidine

Subscribe