Effect of Epidural Needle Injection on Catheter Placement Success During Painless Labour

December 26, 2025 updated by: Neveen Abd El Maksoad Kohaf, Al-Azhar University

Effect of Epidural Needle Injection on Catheter Placement Success During Painless Labour: A Prospective Randomized Study

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for painless labour, but successful catheter placement can be technically challenging due to anatomical and physiological changes in pregnancy. Injecting saline or local anesthetic through the epidural needle before catheter insertion has been proposed to facilitate catheter advancement by dilating the epidural space. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of epidural needle injection on the success rate and ease of catheter placement during labour analgesia.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

216

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Egypt
      • Cairo, Egypt, Egypt, 11865
        • Al-Azhar University
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hany Baumy, M.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients aged 18-40 years.
  • ASA physical status II or III.
  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • Gestational age ≥37 weeks.
  • Active labour with cervical dilatation ≥3 cm.
  • Cephalic presentation.
  • Requesting epidural analgesia for painless labour.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Refusal to participate or to sign informed consent.

    • Age <18 or >40 years.
    • ASA status ≥IV.
    • Allergy to local anesthetics or saline.
    • Coagulopathy or platelet count <100,000/mm³.
    • Local infection at the insertion site.
    • Severe spinal deformity (scoliosis, kyphosis).
    • Multiple pregnancy.
    • Non-cephalic presentation (breech, transverse).
    • Antepartum hemorrhage or placenta previa.
    • Severe preeclampsia or eclampsia.
    • Signs of fetal distress.
    • Previous lumbar spine surgery.
    • Difficult epidural anatomy (on ultrasound or palpation).
    • BMI >40 kg/m²

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Injection group
Patients will receive [10 ml of local anaesthetic] through an epidural needle before catheter advancement.
Patients will receive [10 ml of local anesthetic] through an epidural needle before catheter advancement.
Placebo Comparator: Control group
No injection before catheter insertion.
No injection before catheter insertion.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Success of epidural catheterization on the first attempt.
Time Frame: Assessed immediately during the procedure at the time of epidural catheter placement.
The incidence of success of epidural catheterization on the first attempt will be determined. This measures whether the epidural catheter is successfully inserted on the first attempt after loss of resistance, without the need for repositioning or reattempt. Success is defined by obtaining adequate analgesia with proper catheter function (confirmed by clinical effect).
Assessed immediately during the procedure at the time of epidural catheter placement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of catheterization attempts
Time Frame: Assessed during the procedure until successful catheterization is achieved.
Counts the total number of insertion attempts required to achieve correct epidural catheter placement, reflecting technical ease and procedural efficiency.
Assessed during the procedure until successful catheterization is achieved.
Procedure duration
Time Frame: Assessed intraoperatively, recorded from the beginning of the puncture until catheter fixation.
Measures the time elapsed between needle insertion and successful catheter placement, expressed in minutes. Shorter duration indicates greater ease of insertion.
Assessed intraoperatively, recorded from the beginning of the puncture until catheter fixation.
Incidence of numbness
Time Frame: Assessed post-catheter insertion, within the first 30 minutes after drug administration.
Records any occurrence of unexpected or abnormal sensory numbness following the epidural test dose or analgesic administration, which may indicate uneven drug spread or misplaced catheter.
Assessed post-catheter insertion, within the first 30 minutes after drug administration.
Incidence of unintended dural puncture
Time Frame: Assessed immediately at the time of needle insertion or catheter placement.
Identifies accidental dural puncture events occurring during epidural space entry or catheter advancement.
Assessed immediately at the time of needle insertion or catheter placement.
Maternal satisfaction
Time Frame: Assessed post-delivery, usually within 24 hours after labour.
Evaluates the mother's satisfaction regarding the analgesia quality, comfort during the procedure, and overall experience. Typically rated using a structured satisfaction scale. Maternal satisfaction can be measured on a 0-5 scale using a simple 5-point Likert-type item: 0 = completely dissatisfied, 1 = dissatisfied, 2 = neutral, 3 = satisfied, and 4 = very satisfied.
Assessed post-delivery, usually within 24 hours after labour.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

June 28, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 30, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 15, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 26, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

First Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 26, 2025

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • RC.11.9.2025

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Data can be shared upon reasonable request from the corresponding author

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Labour Analgesia

Clinical Trials on Injection Group

Subscribe