Clinical Aspects, Management and Surveillance of Febrile Illnesses in DRC (FI-CARE)

January 9, 2026 updated by: Institute of Tropical Medicine, Belgium

Aspects Cliniques, Prise en Charge et Surveillance Des Maladies fébriles en RDC

The epidemiology and outcome of febrile illnesses in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) is poorly documented. The FIKI² study, a prospective observational study of community-acquired febrile illnesses coordinated by ITM and INRB and conducted at 2 clinical sites from 2021 to 2023, has deepened the knowledge of clinical presentation, etiology, outcome and profile of inflammatory/infectious biomarkers (white blood cells and C-reactive protein, or CRP).

The management of febrile illnesses remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies, including FIKI². A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The FIKI² study highlighted the potential role of CRP in rationalizing antibiotic use. In parallel, the 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.

Based on the results of the FIKI² study, the main aim of the FI-CARE study is to investigate the impact of these new tools (CRP biomarker, AWARE antibiotic book, and electronic decision support systems) on first-line antibiotic use. Secondly, the study will consolidate previous results from FIKI² sites in terms of monitoring the etiologies of community-acquired febrile illnesses (particularly arboviruses); and reinforce this monitoring at new sites (depending on opportunities). This complementary study will also pursue FIKI²'s strategic objectives of strengthening clinical research capacity and consolidating biobanks in the DRC.

FI-CARE is a prospective, observational, multicenter cohort study of adults and children presenting to the emergency department or outpatient clinic with community-acquired febrile illness. A laboratory component with sample storage in a biobank is added in a modular fashion according to laboratory and research capacities, epidemiological interest and available funds.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

The management of febrile illnesses in low resource settings remains fraught with clinical challenges. Overuse of antibiotics in primary care remains a reality in the field, and has been observed in several studies. A number of initiatives are underway to address this problem, such as the use of biomarkers, the development of treatment guidelines and electronic decision support systems. The 'AWARE antibiotic book' was published at the end of 2022 by the WHO, providing recommendations on the choice (or otherwise) of antibiotic therapy for over 30 common clinical infections, in both primary care and hospital settings.

As in most sub-Saharan African countries, very little data is available in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) on the epidemiology, clinical presentation, causes and outcome of febrile illnesses, and research capacity is generally very weak.

FIKI² was a bi-centric observational study of febrile illnesses conducted between March 29, 2021 and October 9, 2023 at two newly established research sites in the DRC: (i) the pediatric emergency department of the Hôpital Général de Référence de Kinshasa (HGRK) - now the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance (CHUR) - , and (ii) the emergency and outpatient department of the Hôpital Général de Référence (HGR) of the Institut Médical Evangélique (IME) in Kimpese.

The study prospectively recruited patients presenting with fever and collected data on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period. The study included the routine performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as the performance of an RDT for dengue and the measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures.

The study was also integrated for part of its duration into a blood culture surveillance project (protocol approved in Belgium and DRC). Blood samples were also collected for long-term storage and secondary research during the second phase of the study for consenting patients.

The conduct of the study was integrated with research and clinical capacity building, focusing on clinical assessment and CRP evaluation in the management process, in order to reduce antibiotic overuse.

The study provided important insights into the clinical presentation of febrile illnesses, and confirmed the significant impact of malaria on CRP levels, as well as its discriminating value in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection. It highlighted a relatively high frequency of fever-associated bacteremia in ambulatory patients (of unclear clinical significance). The study confirmed high rates of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. While FIKI² was not an interventional study, it was observed that the implementation of CRP was progressively associated with a marked reduction in antibiotic use (especially in cases of undifferentiated fever and non-malarial respiratory tract infection with normal CRP levels), once this test was integrated into the reasoning of the investigating clinicians.

FI-CARE study is a new study that extends the FIKI² study in terms of consolidating epidemiological and etiological research, but has as new objectives to measure the impact of CRP and the AWaRe guide on clinical management (reduction in antibiotic prescribing) AND to integrate effective surveillance of febrile illnesses with epidemic potential into primary care. Similar data collection tools as the FIKI² study will allow comparative analyses between the 2 studies.

In the first instance, the study takes place at the known site of the pediatric emergency department of the 'Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Renaissance de Kinshasa' (CHUR, formerly HGRK). Other sites may be added in the future, depending on epidemiological interest, research capacity and available funding (compatible with the principle of FA5 funds as seed money that can be used to attract further funding). The study is conceptualized as a modular one, with different levels of research depending on the research capacity and level of funding available at the sites involved:

  1. Descriptive clinical characterization, focusing on systematic evaluation of tools to improve management (syndromic approach with CRP, AWaRe antibiotic book, or new electronic support systems), and surveillance (relevance of clinical case definitions).
  2. Analysis of inflammatory biomarkers: C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cells and their differentiation using different types of point-of-care (POC) equipment: portable analyzers and RDTs.
  3. Etiological investigation of specific febrile illnesses

    1. Blood culture surveillance: as part of a project to improve antibiotic resistance surveillance and clinical management (protocol approved in DRC and Belgium).
    2. Evaluation of arboviral pathogens using multiplex diagnostic tools: complementary to surveillance objectives. These analyses will be carried out on stored samples.
  4. Storage of well-documented samples with clinical data, enabling subsequent development and evaluation of diagnostic and surveillance platforms, and other secondary post-hoc research. Future analyses may include transcriptional profiling of peripheral blood to search for early biomarkers to distinguish bacterial from viral infections.

Study procedures are as follows:

  • prospective recruitment of patients presenting with fever
  • data collection on clinical and laboratory characteristics at the time of consultation and during a three-week follow-up period
  • blood sampling at inclusion for routine analyses, performance of a thick smear and/or RDT for malaria, in line with routine care, as well as measurement of CRP, hemoglobin, white blood cell count and differentiation as study laboratory procedures; and for sample storage
  • biobanking of relevant samples (plasma and full blood treated with DNA/RNA shield) for arboviral multiplex PCR and secondary analyses

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD
  • Phone Number: +3232476450
  • Email: ebottieau@itg.be

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with febrile illness presenting at the study site

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ongoing fever objectified at presentation, or documented at home or other health center within 24 hours prior to presentation, defined as: axillary or tympanic temperature > 37.5°C, or oral or rectal temperature > 38°C.
  • Opportunity for contact between patient (or designated relative) and study team on days 7, 14 and 21.
  • Informed consent to participate signed by the patient (adult) or a legally acceptable representative (child or patients whose condition does not allow them to sign informed consent), with the assent of children aged 12 and over, wherever possible.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Child less than two months old.
  • Hospitalization of > 48h in the last 14 days.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
patients with febrile illness
Patients with febrile illness matching inclusion/exclusion criteria presenting at emergency department or outpatient clinic. At this moment one site has been selected. Other sites might be added in the future given rise to other cohorts of febrile patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Time Frame: at enrollment

Describe and compare the use of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints:

Frequency of antibiotics and class of antibiotics used with different types of support

at enrollment
Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support
Time Frame: at enrollment

Describe the appropriateness of antibiotics for patients with community-acquired febrile illness with different types of support that can be used throughout the study to guide patient management (e.g. algorithm combining presenting syndrome with CRP results; etiological approach based on the WHO clinical guide (AWARE antibiotic book) or other; or any new electronic decision-making support). Endpoints:

- Appropriateness of antibiotic use (according to local clinical guidelines if available or WHO)

at enrollment
Describe and compare adherence to different types of support used
Time Frame: at enrollment

Describe and compare adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints:

- frequency of adherence to recommendations

at enrollment
Describe reasons for non-adherence to different types of support used
Time Frame: at enrollment

Describe reasons for non-adherence to the tools used to guide patient management (syndromic algorithm; AWARE antibiotic book or other etiological guide; or an electronic decision support). Endpoints:

- frequency of reasons for non-adherence

at enrollment
Describe clinical presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Frequency of specific symptoms

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe laboratory presentation of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Frequency of laboratory deviations

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe severity of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- frequency of presence of severity criteria

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe etiology of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Frequency of specific and syndromic diagnoses

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the frequency of hospital admissions for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Proportion of patients with a primary or secondary hospital admission

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the frequency of secondary visits for febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Proportion of patients with secondary visits

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe outcome of febrile illnesses in the DRC.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

endpoints:

- Proportion of participants resolved, unresolved and dead by day 21

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe the biomarker profile (CRP, white blood cell count with differentiation) at inclusion of patients with febrile illnesses, and its correlation with specific and syndromic diagnoses and outcome.
Time Frame: at inclusion
endpoint: White blood cell and CRP levels at baseline overall and for different patient categories (specific diagnosis and outcomes)
at inclusion
Evaluate the field accuracy of clinical case definitions currently used for national surveillance of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Endpoint:

proportion of cases meeting one of the case definitions for diseases under surveillance correlated with final diagnosis

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Evaluate the timeliness of reporting for diseases under national surveillance, of the epidemic-prone subgroup.
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Endpoint:

proportion of diseases under national surveillance, of the epidemic-prone subgroup reported to health authorities in time.

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Describe the frequency and etiology of community-acquired bacteremias detected in patients with febrile illness
Time Frame: at inclusion

Endpoint:

frequency of bacteremia and identified germs.

at inclusion
Describe the antibiotic resistance profiles of community-acquired bacteremias detected in patients with febrile illness
Time Frame: at inclusion

Endpoint:

frequency of antibiotic resistance profiles of identified germs causing bacteremia.

at inclusion
Describe the frequency of arboviral diseases detected by a specific PCR panel (initially Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika, Yellow Fever)
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Endpoint:

- frequency of confirmed arbovirus pathogens

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period
Describe clinical and biological presentation of arboviral diseases detected by a specific PCR panel (initially Dengue, Chikungunya, Zika, Yellow Fever)
Time Frame: from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Endpoint:

- frequency of specific clinical and laboratory predictors.

from enrollment to the end of the 3 week follow-up period

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Emmanuel Bottieau, PhD, ITM

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 9, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 9, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Anonymized study data will be supplemented by metadata and documentation, such as the study protocol, annotated CRFs and other information such as codes, which together constitute a dataset, but will not include any direct identifiers.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Study data relating to participants will be available for sharing within a reasonable time after the study and in accordance with ITM's research data sharing principles for a duration of 2O years.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Researchers will be able to request access to anonymized data for well-defined research or secondary analysis via a controlled access procedure.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Biomarkers

Subscribe