Remote Alert Pathway To Optimize CaRe of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices: The RAPTOR-CIED Study (Main Phase) (RAPTOR - MAIN)

February 4, 2026 updated by: Daniel B. Kramer, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

he Remote Alert Pathway to Optimize Care of Cardiac Implantable Electrical Devices (RAPTOR-CIED) Study is a pragmatic, multi-center, randomized trial with 1:1 patient-level randomization comparing the safety and effectiveness of alert-driven care versus guideline-based care for patients with wireless cardiac implantable electrical devices (CIEDs).

The study will be conducted in 2 phases: a Feasibility Phase and a Main Phase. This registration outlines the goals and design features of the Main Phase of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

3000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Adult aged > 18 years
  2. Clinically stable by investigator assessment
  3. Has a newly implanted or existing wireless CIED: single, dual-chamber, biventricular, subcutaneous/extravascular, and leadless systems are all eligible, including pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs)
  4. CIED is from one of the 4 major CIED manufacturers in the US market (99% of implants in the US): Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Abbott, Biotronik
  5. Currently enrolled in remote monitoring as part of standard of care
  6. Primary clinical electrophysiology follow-up at the enrolling center
  7. Understands spoken and written English, Spanish, or Portuguese
  8. Has sufficient cognitive function to answer standardized questions about study rationale and procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of insertable cardiac monitor, either in isolation or in combination with any other CIED
  2. Listed for cardiac transplantation prior to enrollment (N.B. if a patient becomes listed for transplantation during the study, they may continue study participation)
  3. Participation in another study related to novel CIED technology or remote monitoring.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Guideline-based Care
Remote monitoring programming scheduled for alert transmissions, patient-initiated transmissions, and routine transmissions (scheduled to occur every 90 days from the date of enrollment in the study); in-office interrogations on at least an annual basis
Remote monitoring programming scheduled for alert transmissions, patient-initiated transmissions, and routine transmissions (scheduled to occur every 90 days from the date of enrollment in the study); in-office interrogations on at least an annual basis
Active Comparator: Alert-based care
Alert-based care is an alternative strategy for longitudinal management of patients with wireless pacemakers and implantable defibrillators
Alert-based care is an alternative strategy for longitudinal management of patients with wireless pacemakers and implantable defibrillators

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiac events
Time Frame: 2 years
Incidence of MACE (i.e., death, stroke or systemic embolism, and unplanned cardiac device procedure)
2 years
Effectiveness
Time Frame: 2 Years
Proportion of total device related encounters that are actionable (e.g., changes in programming or treatment)
2 Years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

December 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 31, 2031

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 12, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 12, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 6, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2025P001064

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pacemaker

Clinical Trials on Guideline-based Care

Subscribe