Effect of Kinesio Tape Versus Systemic Dexamethasone on Postsurgical Sequels Following Extraction of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars

January 18, 2026 updated by: Ashraf elanzy

The surgical removal of lower wisdom teeth is a common procedure that can cause pain, facial swelling, and difficulty in opening the mouth after surgery. These symptoms are usually managed with medications such as dexamethasone, which helps reduce inflammation but may have unwanted side effects in some patients.

This study compares the use of dexamethasone with Kinesio Tape, a non-drug treatment applied to the skin, to evaluate their effectiveness in reducing pain, swelling, and limited mouth opening after wisdom tooth removal. The findings of this study may help determine whether Kinesio Tape can be a safe and effective alternative to medication for improving recovery after surgery.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The extraction of impacted mandibular third molars is one of the most common procedures performed in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Despite being a routine intervention, it is frequently associated with significant postoperative complications, including pain, edema, and trismus, all of which negatively impact patient recovery and quality of life. These sequelae result from the inflammatory response induced by surgical trauma, leading to increased vascular permeability, extracellular fluid accumulation, and the release of inflammatory mediators. Given these concerns, optimizing postoperative management strategies is critical to improving patient outcomes and enhancing recovery. Traditional pharmacological interventions, particularly dexamethasone, have been widely employed due to their potent anti-inflammatory effects. However, concerns regarding systemic side effects, contraindications, and long-term implications have led to increasing interest in non-pharmacological alternatives such as Kinesio Tape (KT).

The physiological response following third molar extraction is driven by a complex interplay of cellular and molecular mechanisms aimed at tissue healing and immune regulation. Surgical trauma triggers the activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor-alpha, interleukin-1 beta, and interleukin-6, which contribute to increased vascular permeability, edema formation, and nociceptor sensitization. This inflammatory cascade ultimately results in pain, swelling, and limited mouth opening due to spasm and fibrosis of the masticatory muscles, particularly the masseter and pterygoid muscles. The peak of these complications typically occurs within 48 hours postoperatively and, if not adequately managed, may lead to prolonged recovery, reduced oral function, and impaired patient satisfaction.

Dexamethasone is a long-acting glucocorticoid that exerts its effects by inhibiting the transcription of pro-inflammatory genes, thereby reducing cytokine release, stabilizing cell membranes, and preventing fluid extravasation into surrounding tissues. Evidence has shown that a single preoperative dose of dexamethasone administered via submucosal or intramuscular injection can effectively reduce postoperative swelling, trismus, and pain intensity, making it a widely adopted intervention in oral surgery. Nevertheless, despite its efficacy, systemic corticosteroids are associated with potential risks, including immunosuppression, delayed wound healing, alterations in glucose metabolism, and adrenal suppression with prolonged use. These concerns have necessitated the exploration of alternative strategies capable of achieving comparable anti-inflammatory effects without systemic exposure.

Kinesio Tape has gained increasing attention in rehabilitation medicine and sports therapy, with growing interest in its role in postoperative recovery. Designed to lift the skin, decompress underlying tissues, and enhance lymphatic drainage, KT has been proposed as an effective method for reducing edema, improving blood circulation, and modulating neuromuscular function. Unlike corticosteroids, which act at the molecular level to suppress inflammation, KT exerts its effects mechanically by redistributing interstitial pressure, facilitating fluid dynamics, and promoting natural healing mechanisms.

Clinical investigations have assessed the efficacy of KT in reducing postoperative complications following third molar extraction. Application of KT has been associated with reductions in swelling, pain intensity, and trismus during the early postoperative period, suggesting a sustained benefit in controlling tissue inflammation. Moreover, KT does not induce systemic effects, making it an attractive option for patients with contraindications to corticosteroid therapy.

Comparative evaluations between dexamethasone and KT in managing postoperative sequelae suggest that while dexamethasone provides a more immediate reduction in inflammation, KT offers a gradual and sustained improvement in edema resolution. KT application has also been associated with improved patient-reported comfort, potentially due to its continuous therapeutic effect throughout the postoperative period, in contrast to the transient pharmacological action of corticosteroids.

Despite promising findings regarding KT as an alternative or adjunct to dexamethasone, gaps remain in understanding its optimal clinical application, efficacy across diverse patient populations, and potential synergistic effects when combined with pharmacological interventions. This study aims to address these gaps by conducting a comprehensive comparative analysis of Kinesio Tape versus dexamethasone in mitigating postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus following mandibular third molar extraction. Through this investigation, the study seeks to contribute meaningful insights into the development of multimodal, minimally invasive postoperative management strategies in oral surgery.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Mansura
      • Al Mansurah, Mansura, Egypt, 14323
        • Mansura Universtiy

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion criteria:

  1. Patients (male and female) with age 20-40 years old.
  2. Co-operative patients.
  3. An impacted lower wisdom tooth diagnosed with a moderate to severe difficulty index according to Pell and Gregory or Pederson scale classification.104
  4. Medically Free from any systemic conditions.

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Uncooperative patients.
  2. Smoker patients.
  3. Pregnant or lactating women.
  4. Women taking oral contraceptives.
  5. Patient with systemic diseases.
  6. Patients misunderstanding the clinical procedures of the study.
  7. Individuals allergic or intolerant to Dexamethasone used in the study.
  8. Patients on oral anticoagulants.
  9. Uncontrolled diabetic patients.
  10. Individuals with periodontal disease or active infection at the site of impacted tooth.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control
left to heal without use of Dexamethasone nor Kinesio Tape after horizontal impacted mandibular third molar extraction
Active Comparator: Dexamethasone
8 M.g Intramuscular Injection of Dexamethasone** after horizontal impacted mandibular third molar extraction
Experimental: Kinesio Tape
Kinesio Tape application after horizontal impacted mandibular third molar extraction

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Facial swelling (edema) measured in millimeters at three facial points after mandibular third molar extraction
Time Frame: Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively

Edema will be assessed using a flexible ruler at three standardized points:

  1. Lateral corner of the eye to angle of the mandible
  2. Tragus to corner of the mouth
  3. Inferior point of the angle of the mandible to lateral point of the lip commissure Measurements will be performed immediately after extraction, at 3 days, and at 7 days postoperatively.
Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively
Maximum interincisal distance (mm) to assess mouth opening after mandibular third molar extraction
Time Frame: Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively
Mouth opening will be measured as the maximum interincisal distance using a caliper. Measurements will be taken immediately after extraction, at 3 days, and at 7 days postoperatively.
Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively
Pain intensity score after mandibular third molar extraction measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 1-10)
Time Frame: Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively
Pain intensity will be self-reported by each participant using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) ranging from 1 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Pain will be assessed immediately post-extraction, at 3 days, and at 7 days postoperatively.
Immediately after extraction, Day 3, and Day 7 postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohamed Abdelmonem Tawfik, Prof, Mansoura University
  • Principal Investigator: Fakhreldin Hassan Abdelrahman, PHD, Mansoura University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 24, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 20, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The study will not share individual participant data (IPD) outside the primary research group due to the small sample size and to protect participant confidentiality.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Impacted Mandibular Third Molar Extraction

Clinical Trials on Kinesio Tape application

Subscribe