Short-term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain

January 21, 2022 updated by: Eren Timurtas, Marmara University

Short-term Effects of Kinesio Taping in Patients With Mechanical Low Back Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

The aim of this study is to estimate the effect of Kinesio tape (KT) combined with supervised exercise programs compared to exercise alone on pain, lumbar range of motion, and self-reported disability of adults with mechanical low back pain (LBP).

Methods: This was a randomized, controlled clinical trial carried out on 60 individuals with mechanical LBP. Participants were randomly assigned to the control group (n=30) that received McKenzie exercises for 7 days or experimental group (n=30) that received KT application in addition to McKenzie exercises for 7 days. Pain measured by visual analogue scale, lumbar range of motion, and the disability measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were used as outcome measures. Pre and Post measurements were taken at baseline and after 7 days.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • İstanbul, Turkey, 34000
        • Marmara University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 35 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals diagnosed with mechanical LBP by a physician

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals with any structural or pathological changes (spondylitis, spondylolisthesis, cauda equina syndrome, lumbar canal stenosis) in lumbar spine on X-ray or MRI
  • Individuals with or without neurological signs in the lower extremity suggestive upper motor or lower motor neuron involvement,
  • Individuals with a history of trauma or any surgery in the region of back,
  • Individuals with recent aggravation of symptoms,
  • Individuals on a waiting list for spinal surgery or had a spinal surgery in the past 6 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Control Group
The control group will receive only McKenzie exercises for 7 days.

McKenzie exercises: The McKenzie set consists of 5 exercises.

  1. Prone-lying
  2. Prone-extension
  3. Prone press ups
  4. Progressive extension with pillows
  5. Standing extension
Kinesio Tape (KT) application: Participants in the experimental group received additional taping using KT by an experience therapist with prior training in KT application. The tape was applied using the method proposed for the sacrospinalis muscle (Kase, 1996). Y-shaped tape was applied as shown in Figure 1. While the participant was in standing position, the origin of the Y-shaped tape was attached over the centre of the sacrum without stretching the tape and afterward subjects gradually bent forward. A 5-degree angle was maintained within the valley of the Y tape. The tape was changed on the fourth day
Experimental: Experimental Group
The experimental group will receive Kinesio tape application in addition to McKenzie exercises for 7 days.
Kinesio Tape (KT) application: Participants in the experimental group received additional taping using KT by an experience therapist with prior training in KT application. The tape was applied using the method proposed for the sacrospinalis muscle (Kase, 1996). Y-shaped tape was applied as shown in Figure 1. While the participant was in standing position, the origin of the Y-shaped tape was attached over the centre of the sacrum without stretching the tape and afterward subjects gradually bent forward. A 5-degree angle was maintained within the valley of the Y tape. The tape was changed on the fourth day

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: The pain was measured at baseline
Pain was measured using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants placed a mark on the line that best represented their perception of pain at that instant. The VAS score was measured in cm from the left hand end of the line to the mark.
The pain was measured at baseline
Visual analogue scale (VAS)
Time Frame: The pain was measured at the end of intervention (7th day).
Pain was measured using a 10 cm visual analogue scale (VAS). The participants placed a mark on the line that best represented their perception of pain at that instant. The VAS score was measured in cm from the left hand end of the line to the mark.
The pain was measured at the end of intervention (7th day).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: The ODI was measured at study entry 2 minutes after the pain assesment.
The ODI was used to assess the disability. The ODI is a valid and reliable tool that measures functional disability. The scale consists of 10 sections, each section the total possible score is ranging from 0 to 5. After that, the entire score is multiplied by two to get a percentage.
The ODI was measured at study entry 2 minutes after the pain assesment.
The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)
Time Frame: The ODI was measured at the end of intervention (7th day) 2 minutes after the pain assesment.
The ODI was used to assess the disability. The ODI is a valid and reliable tool that measures functional disability. The scale consists of 10 sections, each section the total possible score is ranging from 0 to 5. After that, the entire score is multiplied by two to get a percentage.
The ODI was measured at the end of intervention (7th day) 2 minutes after the pain assesment.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 8, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 10, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 25, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 21, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 24, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 21, 2022

Last Verified

January 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021-1039

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Low Back Pain

Clinical Trials on McKenzie Exercises

3
Subscribe