Video Tutorial and Oral Explanation Vs Oral Explanation Alone in Colonoscopy Preparation (PREPACOTUTO)

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Trial Comparing Oral Explanation Alone and With Video Tutorial for Bowel Preparation Quality and Adenoma Detection

Colonoscopy which is the standard examination for the exploration of the colon and rectum is performed very frequently.

Colon preparation before the examination is an essential step and pescription of the colonic preparation is carried out by the gastroenterologist.

However, despite a standardized explanation of the colon preparation, there is heterogeneity in understanding the colonic preparation, which in some cases compromises the quality of the colonoscopy examination. This clinical study aims to investigate whether an explanation of colonic preparation by tutorial films would increase the quality of colon preparation and would reach the recommendations of the Société française d'endoscopie digestive (SFED) in 2019.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The quality of the colonic preparation is essential for the quality of the colonic examination: in one hand, a good preparation will allow the feasibility of the colonoscopy and will allow a complete examination. On the other hand, the presence of stercoral residues due to a bad colonic preparation reduces the sensitivity of the examination by hiding small lesions or with a very discreet relief. A poorer quality will also increase the length of the examination, which increase the risk of complications. However, in the literature, 20 to 30% of poor colonic preparation is found and 5% of colonoscopies are incomplete, including 42% due to poor preparation. The Pacôme survey, reveals that 6% of patients did not have prior consultation with the gastroenterologist. In addition, if 81% of patients were informed of the importance of the preparation, only 64% were aware of its practical modalities. Only 57% of patients were aware of the risks of inadequate preparation, despite the fact that doctors feel they have well informed their patients. It is also reported in "2 days of endoscopy 2008", that 8% of the information is given by someone other than the gastroenterologist himself. These data demonstrate that there is a heterogeneity in the explanatory content of the consultation prior to the colonoscopy examination. This can then explain the rate of poor quality colonic preparation and consequently the colonoscopy examination. The consultation must be a real therapeutic education and must be sufficiently informative to result in a colonic preparation of quality. We then hypothesize that an informative explanation in the form of a tutorial film would ensure homogeneous and standardized information between practitioners. In addition, the tutorial film will be available to be viewed at home several times by the patient, which may reduce the risk of misunderstanding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

574

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lyon, France, 69007
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique De L'infirmerie Protestante 3 Chem. du Penthod 69300 Caluire-et-Cuire
        • Contact:
          • David TAVAN
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique du Val d'ouest 39 chemin de la Vernique 69130 Ecully
        • Contact:
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Clinique Médico-Chirurgicale Charcot 51 rue Commandant Charcot 69110 Sainte-Foy-lès-lyon
        • Contact:
          • Maxime DELVINCOURT
      • Lyon, France
        • Recruiting
        • Les portes du sud 2 avenue du 11 novembre 1918 69200 Vénissieux
        • Contact:
          • Gildas PHELIP

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Consecutive patients undergoing their first colonoscopy for gastrointestinal symptoms, family history of CRC or suspected CRC.
  • Ability to use the internet and a link to a video.
  • Life expectancy over three months.
  • Patient ≥ 18 years old, requiring a colonoscopy procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with any psychiatric or psychological disorder that does not allow them a properd understanding and follow-up of the study.
  • Patient without internet access.
  • Patient requiring a colonoscopy procedure in emergency

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: face to face + Tutorial
one arm F+T "face to face + Tutorial" will have, in addition to all the items received by Group F, an email containing a link to a video tutorial explaining how to perform colonic preparation.
The explanation of the colonic preparation will be done at home by film tutorial, before the colonic procedure or as usual, by the physician during a specific consultation before the colonic procedure but the quality of preparation will be evaluated by the boston score as usual.
Active Comparator: face to face
The other arm F : "face to face" of patients will have the explanation of the colonic preparation and the administrative and legal documents of the centre's current practice by the gastro-enterologist.
The explanation of the colonic preparation will be done at home by film tutorial, before the colonic procedure or as usual, by the physician during a specific consultation before the colonic procedure but the quality of preparation will be evaluated by the boston score as usual.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of the quality of the colonic preparation by the boston score for each groupe
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure

To date, the evaluation of the quality of the colonic preparation recognized by the SFED is the establishment of the Boston score. For each group, calculate the percentage of patients obtaining a Boston score ≥ 7.

A Boston score ≥ 7 for a high-quality preparation is the score to be obtained according to the 2019 SFED recommendations for at least 90% of patients, excluding colonoscopies performed for emergencies.

During the colonoscopy procedure

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Detection rate of adenomas in each arm will be compared
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure
Number of patients with the detection rate of adenomas in each group will be compared in order to determine if there is a difference of sensibility between the two types of colonic explanation
During the colonoscopy procedure
The rate of complete colonoscopy in each group
Time Frame: During the colonoscopy procedure
Number of patients with complete colonoscopy in each group will be compared in order to determine if there is a difference of faisability between the two types of colonic explanation.
During the colonoscopy procedure
Incidence of procedure- adverse events as assessed by complications reports
Time Frame: From the colonoscopy procedure to one day after
Number of patients with procedure-related adverse events will be reported to the pharmacovigilance department.
From the colonoscopy procedure to one day after

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc O'BRIEN, Hôpital Saint Joseph Saint Luc

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 21, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 13, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Clinical Trials on Colonoscopy

Subscribe