Assessment of Craniofacial and Postural Changes Induced by LM-Activator Therapy in Growing Children

January 25, 2026 updated by: Haner Direskeneli, Marmara University
This prospective study will compare the effects of LM-Activator™ and Twin Block appliances in 26 children (aged 8-13 years) with Class II malocclusion. Skeletal, dentoalveolar, and cervical posture parameters will be assessed using lateral cephalometric radiographs and digital dental models.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

26

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye), 34854
        • Marmara Üniversitesi Recep Tayyip Erdoğan Külliyesi Sağlık Yerleşkesi, Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi, Başıbüyük Yolu 9/3 34854 Başıbüyük / Maltepe / İSTANBUL

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy children aged 8-13 years
  • Cooperative behavior rated as "positive" or "definitely positive" according to the Frankl Behavior Rating Scale
  • Presence of Class II malocclusion
  • Patient-reported complaint of protruding anterior teeth
  • Provision of written informed consent by both the child and their parent/legal guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to continue treatment in the dental chair due to lack of cooperation
  • Failure to attend scheduled follow-up appointments or withdrawal of consent during the study
  • Occurrence of treatment-related complications preventing continuation of therapy (e.g., inability to maintain cooperation between patient and clinician)
  • Inability to attend regular follow-up sessions or repeated absence from scheduled visits

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: LM-Activator™ Therapy Group
Children aged 8-13 years with Class II malocclusion received LM-Activator™ treatment. Skeletal, dentoalveolar, and cervical posture changes were evaluated prospectively.
The LM-Activator™ is a prefabricated myofunctional orthodontic appliance designed for early treatment of Class II malocclusion in growing children. In this study, children aged 8-13 years received LM-Activator™ therapy, and changes in skeletal, dentoalveolar, and cervical posture parameters were evaluated using cephalometric analysis and digital dental models.
Active Comparator: Twin Block Appliance Group
Children aged 8-13 years with Class II malocclusion treated with Twin Block appliances (archived records). Outcomes were analyzed for comparison with the experimental group.
Twin Block is a removable functional appliance commonly used in the management of Class II malocclusion in children.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Overjet (mm) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Overjet defined as the horizontal distance (in millimeters) between the incisal edge of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors, measured on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs. The outcome is calculated as the change from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in ANB Angle (degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
ANB angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to evaluate the sagittal skeletal relationship between the maxilla and mandible. The outcome is calculated as the change from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Overbite (mm) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Overbite defined as the vertical overlap (in millimeters) between the maxillary and mandibular central incisors, measured on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in SNA Angle (degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
SNA (Sella-Nasion-A point) angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to evaluate sagittal position of the maxilla relative to the cranial base. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in SNB Angle (degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
SNB (Sella-Nasion-B point) angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to evaluate sagittal position of the mandible relative to the cranial base. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Upper Incisor Inclination (U1-SN, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
U1-SN angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess maxillary incisor inclination relative to the SN plane. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Lower Incisor Inclination (IMPA, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
IMPA (Incisor Mandibular Plane Angle) measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess mandibular incisor inclination relative to the mandibular plane. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Mandibular Plane Angle (Go-Me to SN, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Mandibular plane angle measured in degrees as the angle between the Go-Me line and the SN plane on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs (vertical skeletal pattern). Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Frankfort-Mandibular Plane Angle (FMA, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
FMA measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess vertical skeletal pattern. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Jarabak Ratio (%) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Jarabak ratio calculated as a percentage from standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess vertical facial proportions. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Cranio-Cervical Angle (NSL-CVT, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
NSL-CVT angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess head and cervical posture (cranial base to cervical vertebra tangent). Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Cranio-Cervical Angle (NSL-OPT, degrees) Assessed by Cephalometric Analysis
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
NSL-OPT angle measured in degrees on standardized lateral cephalometric radiographs to assess head posture relative to the odontoid process tangent. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months
Change in Inner Angle (degrees) Measured on Digital Dental Models
Time Frame: Up to 12 months
Inner angle measured in degrees on digital dental models as defined in the study protocol. Change calculated from baseline to post-treatment.
Up to 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 2, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

De-identified individual participant data (including intraoral photographs and clinical evaluation scores) may be shared in scientific publications or presentations. Data will be limited to information relevant for scientific analysis and will not include any personal identifiers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Orthodontic Appliance

Clinical Trials on LM-Activator™

Subscribe