Single Versus Multiple Vessels Endovascular Tibial Arteries Revascularization for Critical Limb Ischemia

January 28, 2026 updated by: Mohammed Zakria Mohammed El Amir, Aswan University
This study aims to Compare the outcomes of angioplasty for single tibial vessel occlusion versus multiple tibial vessel occlusions in patients with critical limb ischemia. Assess the effectiveness and safety of angioplasty in treating different extents of tibial vessel occlusions. Evaluate the impact of angioplasty on limb salvage rates, healing of ischemic wounds, and overall clinical improvement in patients with CLI.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study demonstrates that in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), revascularization resulting in the patency of multiple tibial vessels is associated with significantly superior clinical outcomes compared to single-vessel patency. While both strategies were equally safe and technically feasible, the multiple-tibial-vessel (MTV) group achieved perfect limb salvage, higher primary patency, lower restenosis rates, and significantly better wound healing at six months. These findings underscore the importance of robust tibial runoff, supporting the "angiogenic reserve" concept where multiple patent vessels provide redundant perfusion pathways that enhance the durability of revascularization and promote tissue repair. Consequently, when anatomically feasible, treatment strategies should prioritize the establishment or preservation of multi-vessel tibial outflow to optimize limb salvage and functional recovery in this high-risk population.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Aswan Governorate
      • Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt, 81511
        • Aswan university hospitals

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with:

Rutherford Class 5 and 6 Single or multiple occlusive infrapopliteal vessel lesions In-flow vessel (superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery) free from flow-limiting lesion or in-flow lesion correction with bypass or endovascular intervention during index procedure.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with:

Prior vascular intervention in target limb Technical/hemodynamic failure inflow occlusive disease. Patient with allergy to the contrast

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Single tibial artery Endovascular Revascularization
Who undergo single tibial artery Endovascular Revascularization
One would undergo single tibial artery Endovascular Revascularization
Other Names:
  • Endovascular
Other would undergo multiple tibialis vessels Endovascular Revascularization
Sham Comparator: Multiple tibialis vessels Endovascular Revascularization
Who undergo more than one tibial artery Revascularization
One would undergo single tibial artery Endovascular Revascularization
Other Names:
  • Endovascular
Other would undergo multiple tibialis vessels Endovascular Revascularization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Salvageable of limb(( patients don't need for major amputation )) sabe limb from major amputation
Time Frame: 2years
Salvageable of limb
2years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Ali Mahmoud Galal, MD of vascular surgery, Aswan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2025

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

December 9, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Limb Ischemia

Clinical Trials on Endovascular Revascularization

Subscribe