Application of Topical Oxygen Therapy Around Customized Healing Collar

January 25, 2026 updated by: Mulhem Ahmad, Cairo University

Evaluation of Linear and Volumetric Soft Tissue Changes Following the Application of Topical Oxygen Therapy Around Customized Healing Collars: Case Series

The preservation and enhancement of peri-implant soft tissues are essential for the long-term success and esthetic integration of dental implants. Customized healing abutments have been introduced to support individualized soft tissue shaping; however, optimizing soft tissue healing around implants remains a clinical challenge. Oxygen plays a critical role in wound healing by promoting angiogenesis, fibroblast proliferation, and collagen synthesis. Topical oxygen therapy has shown promise in accelerating tissue regeneration, yet its application in oral implantology, particularly in conjunction with customized healing abutments, has not been adequately studied. This study aims to provide clinical evidence regarding the effectiveness of topical oxygen therapy in improving linear and volumetric soft tissue changes around dental implants. The findings may guide clinicians in refining soft tissue management protocols and contribute to establishing evidence-based practices in implant dentistry.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Interventions

Preoperative Measures Prior to the second-stage surgical procedure, all participants will undergo a standardized preoperative assessment to ensure their suitability for implant exposure and subsequent healing abutment placement.

The following components will be systematically conducted:

  1. Medical and Dental History Evaluation A comprehensive evaluation of each patient's medical and dental history will be performed to identify any systemic conditions or pharmacological agents that may compromise wound healing or elevate the risk of postoperative complications.
  2. Clinical and Radiographic Assessment A detailed clinical examination will be undertaken to evaluate the thickness of the soft tissue, the width of keratinized mucosa, and the condition of the mucosa overlying the implant site. Radiographic assessment using periapical radiographs or cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), where indicated, will be conducted to confirm successful osseointegration of the dental implant and to exclude any evidence of peri-implant pathology.
  3. Oral Hygiene Evaluation and Instruction Oral hygiene status will be assessed using the Plaque Index. Patients will receive personalized oral hygiene instructions to ensure optimal plaque control before the surgical intervention. In cases where oral hygiene is deemed suboptimal, professional mechanical plaque removal (PMPR) will be provided, followed by re-evaluation prior to proceeding with the second-stage surgery.

Surgical Protocol

During the second-stage procedure, local anesthesia will be administered via infiltration using 2% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine. A mid-crestal or slightly palatal crestal incision will then be made to access the implant site.

Once osseointegration is clinically confirmed, the cover screw will be removed. Subsequently, a customized healing abutment(PEEK), appropriate to the implant diameter, will be placed and securely hand-tightened.

Application of Blue®M Gel:

Immediately following the placement of the healing abutment, Blue®M oral gel (Blue®M Europe BV, theNetherlands) will be applied circumferentially around the healing collar using a sterile microbrush. The gel will be gently massaged into the peri-implant mucosa and left in situ.

Postoperative instructions will include:

  • Patients will be advised to refrain from rinsing or brushing the treated area for the first 12 hours.
  • Blue®M gel application will be continued by the patient twice daily for 7 days postoperatively, in conjunction with standard oral hygiene measures.

Postoperative Instructions and Follow-Up Patients will receive standard postoperative instructions and will be prescribed 0.12% chlorhexidine mouthwash to be used twice daily for one week. Analgesics (e.g., ibuprofen 400 mg) will be administered as needed. If sutures are used, they will be removed after 7-10 days.

Patients will be clinically evaluated at baseline (day of second-stage surgery), day 7, and day 21 for the following:

Horizontal and linear Soft tissue change ,Patient-reported outcomes (pain, discomfort),Digital photographs .

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

6

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Recruiting
        • Cairo University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 21 years and above.

    • Indicated for customized healing collar placement after second-stage surgery.
    • Good general health.
    • Able and willing to provide written informed consent.
    • Committed to follow-up visits.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals below 21 years old.
  • Systemic diseases affecting healing.
  • Smokers/tobacco users.
  • Pregnant/lactating women.
  • Medications affecting soft tissue healing.
  • Chemotherapy/radiotherapy patients.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Topical Oxygen therapy

Participants will undergo a standardized preoperative assessment prior to second-stage implant surgery, including medical and dental history review, clinical and radiographic evaluation to confirm implant osseointegration, and oral hygiene assessment with reinforcement as needed.

During the second-stage procedure, local anesthesia will be administered, followed by a crestal incision to access the implant site. After removal of the cover screw, a customized PEEK healing abutment will be placed.

Immediately after abutment placement, Blue®M oral gel (Blue®M Europe BV, The Netherlands) will be applied around the healing collar and gently massaged into the peri-implant mucosa. Participants will continue topical application twice daily for 7 days.

Standard postoperative care will be provided. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline, 7 days, and 21 days to assess soft tissue changes, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical photographs.

Participants will undergo a standardized preoperative assessment prior to second-stage implant surgery, including medical and dental history review, clinical and radiographic evaluation to confirm implant osseointegration, and oral hygiene assessment with reinforcement as needed. During the second-stage procedure, local anesthesia will be administered, followed by a crestal incision to access the implant site. After removal of the cover screw, a customized PEEK healing abutment will be placed. Immediately after abutment placement, Blue®M oral gel (Blue®M Europe BV, The Netherlands) will be applied around the healing collar and gently massaged into the peri-implant mucosa. Participants will continue topical application twice daily for 7 days. Standard postoperative care will be provided. Clinical evaluations will be performed at baseline, 7 days, and 21 days to assess soft tissue changes, patient-reported outcomes, and clinical photographs.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft tissue dimensional changes
Time Frame: baseline: preoperative and after 3 months and after 6 months

Horizontal Tissue Linear Alterations were measured in millimeters by superimposing baseline and follow-up 3D digital models and calculating the Mean Buccal Change (MBC) and Mean Total Change (MTC) using software such as ImageJ, Geomagic, or MeshLab at standardized buccal reference points.

Vertical Linear Tissue Alterations were quantified in millimeters by evaluating changes in Mesial Papillae Height Variation (mPHv), Distal Papillae Height Variation (dPHv), Papillae Height Variation (PHv), and Midfacial Height Variation (MFHv) through calibrated digital photography or intraoral scanning relative to fixed anatomical landmarks.

baseline: preoperative and after 3 months and after 6 months
Pink Esthetic Score (PES)
Time Frame: baseline: preoperative and after 3 months and after 6 months
determined by scoring seven soft tissue parameters (papillae, mucosal contour, level, color, and texture) from 0 to 2, based on clinical photographs compared with adjacent teeth, yielding a total score ranging from 0 to 14.
baseline: preoperative and after 3 months and after 6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative Pain
Time Frame: baseline: at day 1 , day 3 , day 10
assesse using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), where patients rated their pain intensity from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain), either verbally or through a visual analog form.
baseline: at day 1 , day 3 , day 10
Wound Healing
Time Frame: Baseline : day 1 , day 3 ,day 10
evaluated using the Modified Healing Index (MHI) as proposed by clinically scoring tissue color, swelling, exudate, necrosis, granulation, and epithelialization, with each parameter assigned a value and summed to reflect overall healing quality.
Baseline : day 1 , day 3 ,day 10

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mulhem ahmed, Cairo University
  • Study Chair: maie ismael, Cairo University
  • Study Director: Mona Darhous, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

September 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 25, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 3, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • per3312026

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Soft Tissue

Clinical Trials on topical oxygen therapy

Subscribe