Comparative Evaluation of Post Obturation Pain After Root Canal Treatment Using Tricalcium Silicate vs Resin-Based Sealers

January 30, 2026 updated by: Pooja Kumari, Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry, Pakistan

A Comparative Evaluation of Post Obturation Pain After Root Canal Treatment Using Tricalcium Silicate Versus Resin-based Sealers in Cases With Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis

This is a randomized controlled trial comparing the mean and standard deviation of postobturation pain using two different sealers: a tricalcium silicate-based sealer (CeraSeal) and a resin-based sealer (Endoplus) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis undergoing root canal treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

• The study will be conducted after approval from the Institutional Ethics Review Committee of the Armed Forces Institute of Dentistry. Informed written consent will be obtained from all patients, and demographic details (name, age, gender, and contact information) will be collected. This is a randomized clinical trial, and the sample size will be divided into two groups using computer-generated randomization. Group 1 will receive Endoplus (resin-based sealer), and Group 2 will receive CeraSeal (bioceramic sealer).

All root canal procedures will be performed by the principal investigator. At the first visit, local anesthesia (2% lignocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine) and rubber dam isolation will be used. Working length will be determined using an apex locator and confirmed with a periapical radiograph. Chemo-mechanical preparation will be performed using 2.5% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Cleaning and shaping will be done up to F2 ProTaper using hand files and nickel-titanium (NiTi) rotary files, with recapitulation between each file to maintain canal patency. Non-setting calcium hydroxide will be placed as an intracanal medicament, followed by a temporary restoration with Cavit. Patients will be recalled after one week for obturation and will proceed only if asymptomatic.

At the second visit, obturation will be carried out according to group allocation. Group 1 will receive Endoplus resin-based sealer using a single-cone gutta-percha technique with a heated plugger (System B). Group 2 will receive CeraSeal bioceramic sealer with matched bioceramic cones using the same System B technique. Accessory cones will be used for wide or irregular canals. A permanent composite restoration (Coltene) will be placed, and occlusion will be adjusted.

Postoperative pain will be recorded using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at 24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days. Ibuprofen will be prescribed only if the pain becomes unbearable, and patients will document the dose and frequency taken. Two independent blinded endodontists will evaluate radiographs for technical errors or sealer extrusion. The primary measure of success will be the level of postoperative pain at follow-up, comparing outcomes between Endoplus resin-based sealer and CeraSeal bioceramic sealer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

118

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab Province
      • Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan, 46000
        • Armed Force Institute of Dentistry
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Patients of age group 18 to 60 years

    • Healthy patients with ASA class 1 and 2
    • Patients of both genders
    • Teeth diagnosed as symptomatic irreversible pulpitis
    • Single as well as multirooted teeth

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with calcified or previously treated canals
  • Immunocompromised or mentally handicapped patients
  • Pregnant or lactating mothers
  • Teeth with periodontal probing depths of 5 mm or more
  • Cracked or un restorable teeth
  • Teeth where root canal instrumentation could not reach within 2 mm of the radiographic apex

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Tricalcium silicate based sealer (Bio ceramic)
CeraSeal bioceramic sealer will be used for obturation with matched bioceramic cones and a heated plugger (System B).
Ceraseal (bioceramic sealer) - assigned to Group 2
Other Names:
  • CeraSeal sealer, bioceramic sealer, calcium silicate sealer
Experimental: Resin based sealer
Endoplus resin-based sealer will be used for obturation with single-cone gutta-percha and a heated plugger (System B)
Endoplus (resin-based sealer) - assigned to Group 1
Other Names:
  • Endoplus sealer, resin sealer, gutta-percha sealer

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Postoperative pain after root canal treatment assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Time Frame: 24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days
Postoperative pain will be recorded using a 10-centimeter Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). On this scale, 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst pain imaginable. Higher scores correspond to greater pain intensity, meaning more pain. Patients will self-report their pain level at each time point (24 hours, 72 hours, and 7 days). This measure will be used to compare postoperative pain between patients treated with Endoplus resin-based sealer and CeraSeal bioceramic sealer.
24 hours, 72 hours and 7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

February 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

August 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

Individual Participant Data (IPD) will not be shared with other researchers because this trial involves a small patient sample, and the data contains identifiable clinical information that cannot be fully anonymized without compromising patient confidentiality. The dataset is intended solely for analysis within the approved research protocol, as permitted by the Institutional Ethics Review Committee. Therefore, IPD sharing is not planned.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pain

Clinical Trials on Tricalcium silicate sealar

Subscribe