- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07390136
Sparking Potential, Revealing Infant Neurocognitive Traits (SPRINT)
February 4, 2026 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison
SPRINT: Sparking Potential, Revealing Infant Neurocognitive Traits
This research focuses on the long-term cognitive development of children, including healthy infants and those who had a perinatal brain injury.
As part of this research study, children complete virtual game and assessments.
Parents will be asked to fill out questionnaires about their child's behavior and stress in the home.
All study visits will take place online via Zoom.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
200
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 608-577-2415
- Email: carrascomccaul@neurology.wisc.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Wisconsin
-
Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53726
- Recruiting
- University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
-
Contact:
- Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD
- Phone Number: 608-577-2415
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
Infants ages 6-24 months located across the United States and internationally.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Child-parent dyads will be recruited to the study.
- Children 3-24 months with and without a history of a perinatal brain injury (PBI) will be included in this study.
Children with PBIs will include:
- Children diagnosed during the neonatal period with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy,
- Children born at a premature gestational age (born at less than 32 weeks gestational age).
- Children diagnosed with cerebral palsy
Healthy control participants meeting inclusion criteria will include:
- healthy infants with no prior neurological (brain disorder) history
- For all parents: the only research inclusion criteria is to be the parent or legal guardian of a newborn with perinatal brain injury or healthy control participant.
Exclusion Criteria:
Healthy infants to be included in the control group will not have:
- a prior history of brain injury
- a diagnosis of cerebral palsy
- a history of a neurological disorder
- prior admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
- Children with chromosomal abnormalities, genetic syndromes and major congenital malformations will be excluded from both the patient groups and the control group.
- Parents will have no exclusionary criteria.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
|---|
|
Children with perinatal brain injuries
Children ages 6 months (may be enrolled prior to 6 months) - 24 months who are diagnosed with 1) hypoxic- ischemic encephalopathy, 2) cerebral palsy, and/or 3) were born premature at less than 28 weeks gestational age.
|
|
Healthy Children
Children ages 6 months (may be enrolled prior to 6 months) - 24 months of age with no prior history of a brain and/or cardiac illness early in life.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Infant Attention Task (IAT)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 12,18, and 24-month time points
|
A behavioral measure used with infants to assess attentional control and processing.
Infants are presented with visual puppet stimuli four distinct "looks", and researchers record looking time, shifts in attention, or habituation patterns.
More sustained attention in the early looks followed by habituation to the stimuli in the later looks often indicates better early attentional capacity.
Total accumulated looking time to a stimulus in visual preference-type tasks commonly ranges from roughly 15-30+ seconds per trial, depending on the infant's age and the stimulus.
|
Assessed at the 12,18, and 24-month time points
|
|
Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAPUTE)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6 and 12-month time points
|
An assessment for infants and young children that evaluates cognitive and language development.
It combines two scales: CAT (Cognitive Adaptive Test) for problem-solving and adaptive skills, and CLAMS (Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale) for language and auditory milestones.
Scores provide age-equivalent estimates of cognitive and language abilities.
The CAPUTE scores are reported as developmental quotients ranging roughly from 40 to 160, with scores ≥85 considered within normal limits, 70-84 indicating borderline development, and <70 suggesting developmental delay.
|
Assessed at the 6 and 12-month time points
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Confusion, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,12, and 24-month time point
|
Parents and/or Caregivers rate items describing household noise, crowding, and routine; responses are summed to create a total CHAOS score.
The CHAOS total score ranges from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating a more chaotic, noisy, and disorganized home environment; scores below 25 typically reflect lower chaos, whereas scores above 35 suggest high household chaos.
|
Assessed at the 6, 9,12, and 24-month time point
|
|
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time points
|
A questionnaire which measures stress and satisfaction associated with parenting; items are summed to create a total parental stress score.
On the Parental Stress Scale, total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater levels of parental stress and lower scores reflecting lower stress and more satisfaction in the parenting role.
|
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time points
|
|
Parenting Daily Hassle (PDH) Scales: Frequency Score
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
|
A parent-report measure assessing the frequency and intensity of everyday parenting stressors (e.g., child demands, disruptions to routines); item ratings are summed or averaged to yield frequency and intensity scores.
On the PDH Scale, frequency scores range from 0 to 80 with higher totals indicating more frequent and/or more stressful everyday parenting hassles.
|
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
|
|
Parenting Daily Hassle (PDH) Scales: Intensity Score
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
|
A parent-report measure assessing the frequency and intensity of everyday parenting stressors (e.g., child demands, disruptions to routines); item ratings are summed or averaged to yield frequency and intensity scores.
On the PDH Scale, intensity scores range from 0 to 100 with higher totals indicating more frequent and/or more stressful everyday parenting hassles.
|
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
|
|
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds-QL)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
|
The PedsQL is an inventory of statements scored by reverse-scoring responses to a 5-point Likert scale and then transforming them to a 0-100 scale.
A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
|
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
|
|
Early Executive Function Questionnaire (EEFQ)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time points
|
A questionnaire is given to parents that assesses what executive functions children are exhibiting.
More functions exhibited means further along in executive function development.
The (EEFQ uses parent ratings on a 7-point scale for 31 items, with subscale and composite scores averaging between 1 and 7 - higher scores indicate stronger emerging executive function behaviors in infants and toddlers.
|
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time points
|
|
Reilly Role Overload Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
|
In the Reilly Role Overload questionnaire, parents of child participants rate the frequency of feeling overwhelmed by role demands; item responses are summed to create a total role overload score.
Total scores range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating greater perceived role overload due to excessive demands relative to time and energy.
|
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
|
|
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool (BRIEF-P)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 24-month time point
|
Behavior is reported in the BRIEF-P.
Behaviors reported by parents can be used to predict later executive function exhibited by children.
List of statements provided about child's behavior, parent will answer whether this is never a problem (N), sometimes a problem (S), and often a problem (O).
Responses reported as participant counts, answering N more often is considered a better score.
On the BRIEF-P, T-scores around 50 are average, 60-64 are slightly at risk, and 65 or higher indicate significant executive function difficulties.
|
Assessed at the 24-month time point
|
|
Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 24-month time point
|
The PARCA-R is a parent-completed questionnaire used to assess early cognitive and language development in young children (around 2 years old).
It asks parents about their child's vocabulary, sentence use, and nonverbal skills.
Parents' responses are summed to generate language, nonverbal, and total cognitive scores.
Scores have a mean of 100, with scores around 100 indicating typical cognitive and language development at approx. 2 years, lower scores suggesting possible delay, and higher scores reflecting stronger development
|
Assessed at the 24-month time point
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 30, 2024
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2030
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 1, 2030
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 28, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 28, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
February 5, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 9, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 4, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2024-0452
- UWMSN | SMPH | NRL Neurology (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
- Protocol Version 5/3/2024 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants
-
University of Wisconsin, MadisonNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Not yet recruitingHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult ParticipantsUnited States
-
University of PalermoCompletedHealthy Participants | Healthy Adult Participants | Healthy Young AdultsItaly
-
Touro University, CaliforniaNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)RecruitingHealthy Participants | Obese But Otherwise Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Beijing Tide Pharmaceutical Co., LtdRecruitingHealthy | Healthy ParticipantsChina
-
Aston UniversityCooperVision, Inc.Enrolling by invitationHealthy | Healthy ParticipantsUnited Kingdom
-
Universidad San SebastiánAgencia Nacional de Investigación y DesarrolloNot yet recruitingHealthy | Healthy Adult ParticipantsChile
-
Standard Process Inc.Recruiting
-
PfizerCompletedHealthy Subjects | Healthy ParticipantsUnited States
-
Simcere Pharmaceutical Co., LtdNot yet recruiting
-
Fresenius KabiOxford Brookes UniversityNot yet recruiting