Sparking Potential, Revealing Infant Neurocognitive Traits (SPRINT)

February 4, 2026 updated by: University of Wisconsin, Madison

SPRINT: Sparking Potential, Revealing Infant Neurocognitive Traits

This research focuses on the long-term cognitive development of children, including healthy infants and those who had a perinatal brain injury. As part of this research study, children complete virtual game and assessments. Parents will be asked to fill out questionnaires about their child's behavior and stress in the home. All study visits will take place online via Zoom.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Wisconsin
      • Madison, Wisconsin, United States, 53726
        • Recruiting
        • University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Medicine and Public Health
        • Contact:
          • Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD
          • Phone Number: 608-577-2415

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Infants ages 6-24 months located across the United States and internationally.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Child-parent dyads will be recruited to the study.
  • Children 3-24 months with and without a history of a perinatal brain injury (PBI) will be included in this study.
  • Children with PBIs will include:

    • Children diagnosed during the neonatal period with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy,
    • Children born at a premature gestational age (born at less than 32 weeks gestational age).
    • Children diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Healthy control participants meeting inclusion criteria will include:

    • healthy infants with no prior neurological (brain disorder) history
  • For all parents: the only research inclusion criteria is to be the parent or legal guardian of a newborn with perinatal brain injury or healthy control participant.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy infants to be included in the control group will not have:

    • a prior history of brain injury
    • a diagnosis of cerebral palsy
    • a history of a neurological disorder
    • prior admission to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU)
  • Children with chromosomal abnormalities, genetic syndromes and major congenital malformations will be excluded from both the patient groups and the control group.
  • Parents will have no exclusionary criteria.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Children with perinatal brain injuries
Children ages 6 months (may be enrolled prior to 6 months) - 24 months who are diagnosed with 1) hypoxic- ischemic encephalopathy, 2) cerebral palsy, and/or 3) were born premature at less than 28 weeks gestational age.
Healthy Children
Children ages 6 months (may be enrolled prior to 6 months) - 24 months of age with no prior history of a brain and/or cardiac illness early in life.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Infant Attention Task (IAT)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 12,18, and 24-month time points
A behavioral measure used with infants to assess attentional control and processing. Infants are presented with visual puppet stimuli four distinct "looks", and researchers record looking time, shifts in attention, or habituation patterns. More sustained attention in the early looks followed by habituation to the stimuli in the later looks often indicates better early attentional capacity. Total accumulated looking time to a stimulus in visual preference-type tasks commonly ranges from roughly 15-30+ seconds per trial, depending on the infant's age and the stimulus.
Assessed at the 12,18, and 24-month time points
Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAPUTE)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6 and 12-month time points
An assessment for infants and young children that evaluates cognitive and language development. It combines two scales: CAT (Cognitive Adaptive Test) for problem-solving and adaptive skills, and CLAMS (Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale) for language and auditory milestones. Scores provide age-equivalent estimates of cognitive and language abilities. The CAPUTE scores are reported as developmental quotients ranging roughly from 40 to 160, with scores ≥85 considered within normal limits, 70-84 indicating borderline development, and <70 suggesting developmental delay.
Assessed at the 6 and 12-month time points

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Confusion, Hubbub and Order Scale (CHAOS)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,12, and 24-month time point
Parents and/or Caregivers rate items describing household noise, crowding, and routine; responses are summed to create a total CHAOS score. The CHAOS total score ranges from 15 to 60, with higher scores indicating a more chaotic, noisy, and disorganized home environment; scores below 25 typically reflect lower chaos, whereas scores above 35 suggest high household chaos.
Assessed at the 6, 9,12, and 24-month time point
Parental Stress Scale
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time points
A questionnaire which measures stress and satisfaction associated with parenting; items are summed to create a total parental stress score. On the Parental Stress Scale, total scores range from 18 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater levels of parental stress and lower scores reflecting lower stress and more satisfaction in the parenting role.
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time points
Parenting Daily Hassle (PDH) Scales: Frequency Score
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
A parent-report measure assessing the frequency and intensity of everyday parenting stressors (e.g., child demands, disruptions to routines); item ratings are summed or averaged to yield frequency and intensity scores. On the PDH Scale, frequency scores range from 0 to 80 with higher totals indicating more frequent and/or more stressful everyday parenting hassles.
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
Parenting Daily Hassle (PDH) Scales: Intensity Score
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
A parent-report measure assessing the frequency and intensity of everyday parenting stressors (e.g., child demands, disruptions to routines); item ratings are summed or averaged to yield frequency and intensity scores. On the PDH Scale, intensity scores range from 0 to 100 with higher totals indicating more frequent and/or more stressful everyday parenting hassles.
Assessed at the 6,12,18, and 24-month time point
Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (Peds-QL)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
The PedsQL is an inventory of statements scored by reverse-scoring responses to a 5-point Likert scale and then transforming them to a 0-100 scale. A higher score indicates a better quality of life.
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
Early Executive Function Questionnaire (EEFQ)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time points
A questionnaire is given to parents that assesses what executive functions children are exhibiting. More functions exhibited means further along in executive function development. The (EEFQ uses parent ratings on a 7-point scale for 31 items, with subscale and composite scores averaging between 1 and 7 - higher scores indicate stronger emerging executive function behaviors in infants and toddlers.
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time points
Reilly Role Overload Questionnaire
Time Frame: Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
In the Reilly Role Overload questionnaire, parents of child participants rate the frequency of feeling overwhelmed by role demands; item responses are summed to create a total role overload score. Total scores range from 13 to 65, with higher scores indicating greater perceived role overload due to excessive demands relative to time and energy.
Assessed at the 6, 9,18, and 24-month time point
Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function-Preschool (BRIEF-P)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 24-month time point
Behavior is reported in the BRIEF-P. Behaviors reported by parents can be used to predict later executive function exhibited by children. List of statements provided about child's behavior, parent will answer whether this is never a problem (N), sometimes a problem (S), and often a problem (O). Responses reported as participant counts, answering N more often is considered a better score. On the BRIEF-P, T-scores around 50 are average, 60-64 are slightly at risk, and 65 or higher indicate significant executive function difficulties.
Assessed at the 24-month time point
Parent Report of Children's Abilities-Revised (PARCA-R)
Time Frame: Assessed at the 24-month time point
The PARCA-R is a parent-completed questionnaire used to assess early cognitive and language development in young children (around 2 years old). It asks parents about their child's vocabulary, sentence use, and nonverbal skills. Parents' responses are summed to generate language, nonverbal, and total cognitive scores. Scores have a mean of 100, with scores around 100 indicating typical cognitive and language development at approx. 2 years, lower scores suggesting possible delay, and higher scores reflecting stronger development
Assessed at the 24-month time point

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Melisa Carrasco McCaul, MD, PhD, University of Wisconsin, Madison

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 28, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 28, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 9, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 4, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2024-0452
  • UWMSN | SMPH | NRL Neurology (Other Identifier: UW Madison)
  • Protocol Version 5/3/2024 (Other Identifier: UW Madison)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy Participants

Subscribe