THE EFFECT OF STANDARD PATIENT AND WEB-BASED SIMULATION ON FALL KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES AMONG NURSING STUDENTS

February 2, 2026 updated by: ESRA ERTUĞRUL

THE EFFECT OF STANDARD PATIENT AND WEB-BASED SIMULATION APPLICATIONS ON NURSING STUDENTS' KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS FALLS

The most fundamental principle of any healthcare service is "First, do no harm." No one should be harmed in healthcare services. Falls are the most frequently reported and preventable incident among all safety incidents in the hospital environment. However, falls are the most frequently reported incident among all safety incidents. Patient falls are the most common adverse events in hospitals. Patient falls in hospitals cause physiological and psychological harm to patients, affect the timeliness, effectiveness, and efficiency of care, and lead to increases in hospital costs and length of stay. Therefore, preventing falls, which have serious consequences, is of vital importance in terms of patient safety and healthcare quality. Nurses are a group that can sensitively identify and manage issues related to patient safety. Therefore, it is important to identify and reduce the underlying risk factors for falls in patients and to provide appropriate nursing interventions to prevent secondary injuries in patients who have fallen.

Simulation is an important part of nursing education because it improves patient care and ensures patient safety. Simulation-based learning provides students with realistic clinical situations, allowing them to practice clinical skills in a safe environment. This enables students to develop their clinical skills, communication, decision-making, and self-efficacy in a risk-free, safe, and structured environment, representing a contemporary teaching approach.

Teaching safe patient care during nursing students' education is one of the most fundamental elements of nursing education. Inadequate nursing knowledge and attitudes increase the risk of falls among patients receiving care. Students with insufficient clinical experience are at high risk of making undesirable errors in patient care. It is important to increase nursing students' knowledge and attitudes regarding falls during their education.

The standard patient and web-based simulation application offers the closest experience to real clinical situations, providing students with significant potential to become aware of falls they may encounter in practice and prevent potential errors. The increasing importance given to patient safety due to the rising number of fall cases supports the necessity of this research. The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of standard patient and web-based simulation methods on nursing students' knowledge and attitudes regarding falls.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

81

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:Students were included in the study if they were:

  • A senior nursing student at Aydın Adnan Menderes University Faculty of Nursing
  • Volunteering to participate in the study
  • Not absent at any time during the study period
  • Working/not working as a nurse

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Graduated from a health vocational high school
  • Admitted through the Foreign Student Exam (YÖS)
  • Graduated from a health-related associate's degree program and then enrolled in the nursing department through the Vertical Transfer Exam (DGS)
  • Students who did not wish to participate in the study were excluded from the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Group 1 Group trained with a standard patient in the simulation lab
The group receiving training with standard patients in a simulation laboratory environment.
Experimental: Group 2 The group is receiving web-based simulation training in a laboratory setting.
Group receiving training through web-based simulation in a laboratory environment.
No Intervention: Group 3 Classical classroom education group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Planned Mean Change in Total Knowledge Score on the Fall Prevention Knowledge Test (0-28)
Time Frame: From enrollment to the 8th week of the intervention
Planned Mean Change in Total Knowledge Score on the Fall Prevention Knowledge Test (0-28) Total knowledge score will be measured using the Fall Prevention Knowledge Test among nursing students. Change from baseline will be assessed.
From enrollment to the 8th week of the intervention
Planned Mean Change in Attitude Score on the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Fall Prevention Scale
Time Frame: From enrollment to 8 weeks after intervention
Planned Mean Change in Attitude Score on the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Fall Prevention Scale Mean attitude score will be measured using the Nurses' Attitudes Toward Fall Prevention Scale among nursing students. Change from baseline will be assessed.
From enrollment to 8 weeks after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Planned Mean Change in Total Knowledge Score on the Patient Fall Prevention Knowledge Test
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The change in the total knowledge scores of nursing students will be measured using the Patient Fall Prevention Knowledge Test. Change from baseline will be assessed.
Immediately after the intervention
Planned Mean Change in Average Attitude Score on the Nurses' Attitudes Towards Fall Prevention Scale
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The change in the average attitude scores of nursing students will be measured using the Nurses' Attitudes Towards Fall Prevention Scale. Change from baseline will be assessed.
Immediately after the intervention
Planned Mean Change in Student Satisfaction Score Regarding the Simulation Experience
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The change in the average satisfaction score of nursing students in the experimental group will be measured using the Student Satisfaction Scale. Change from baseline will be assessed.
Immediately after the intervention
Planned Mean Change in Learning Self-Confidence Score Regarding the Simulation Experience
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
The average learning self-confidence score of nursing students in the experimental group will be measured using the Learning Confidence Scale. Change from baseline will be assessed.
Immediately after the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

January 5, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 22, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 31, 2025

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 5, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 2, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

This study does not plan to share raw data at the individual level. However, to promote transparency of research findings, summary data (demographic characteristics, pretest and posttest scores, group comparisons, and analysis results) that do not include participant identification will be shared with researchers upon request. No personal identifying information (name, contact information, institutional information, etc.) will be shared.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

August 2026-December 2026

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Access to data will be available only after a written request from the researcher and a review by the research team for scientific relevance. Access will only be provided by securely transmitting designated datasets via email; no sharing will be made via any open-access repository or online platform.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • SAP
  • ICF
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Fall

Clinical Trials on Standardized patient

Subscribe